The 787 again
Jun 15, 2019, 10:42 am
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK.
Programs: SQ LPPS, A3 *G, BA Silver aiming for Bronze
Posts: 1,506
The 787 again
I'm not sure how serious this report is but it seems a UK 787 pilot has commented on the story about engine fire extinguishers on the plane. The FAA are not grounding the plane - just like they didn't with the 7M8 until public opinion and regulators outside the US took over.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...7-safety-fears
https://www.theguardian.com/business...7-safety-fears
Jun 15, 2019, 11:02 am
#3
Join Date: Nov 2016
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 457
There is no such thing as risk-free flying, just like there's no risk-free driving or risk-free walking down the street. All the industry can do is try to minimise risks to what is deemed to be an acceptable level by the regulators. Should airlines not take off and land at night because it's a bit more risky than flying in the day time? Where would you draw the line? You will find open technical issues like this with almost all aircraft types out there at one time or another, but it rarely warrants grounding.
Jun 15, 2019, 11:13 am
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,246
Fire extinguisher reliability sounds pretty serious to me, did Airbus have similar technical issues with any of its aircraft?
Jun 15, 2019, 11:19 am
#5
Join Date: Nov 2016
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 457
There is one active for the A350 at the moment concerning potential corrosion of the bolts that secure the tail fin to the fuselage: Airbus SAS Airplanes
Jun 15, 2019, 11:24 am
#6
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 5 miles from EMA
Programs: BD, BAEC Pleb, VS Pleb, Accor Pleb, HHonors Gold, Big White Season Pass
Posts: 5,904
There is one active for the A350 at the moment concerning potential corrosion of the bolts that secure the tail fin to the fuselage: Airbus SAS Airplanes
Jun 15, 2019, 12:57 pm
#8
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
Most engine fires occur on startup or take off, with the occasional warning on shutdown. The fire services are well able to deal with problems if the fire suppressant fails. I have never heard of an engine fire in normal cruise.
On the other hand, cargo fire in cruise is a more significant risk. The cargo fire switches are different.
On the other hand, cargo fire in cruise is a more significant risk. The cargo fire switches are different.
Jun 15, 2019, 3:29 pm
#9
Join Date: May 2017
Programs: BA - Gold, EK - Gold
Posts: 107
But surely they should be required to do a recall and fix it??
If your fire extinguisher in your office was missing or faulty it would be illegal and you would have to replace it!
You would have thought that since I am in the air it would be even more serious??
If your fire extinguisher in your office was missing or faulty it would be illegal and you would have to replace it!
You would have thought that since I am in the air it would be even more serious??
Jun 16, 2019, 1:35 am
#11
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NT Australia
Programs: QF WP
Posts: 4,160
in this case the extinguishers are present but the switch to activate them seems to have developed a tendency to stick in the off position if the system is not used regularly (which evidently it is not). So the regulator has mandated it’s inspected every 30 days instead of whatever presumably longer interval it was being checked at before
Jun 16, 2019, 6:46 am
#13
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 182
Most engine fires occur on startup or take off, with the occasional warning on shutdown. The fire services are well able to deal with problems if the fire suppressant fails. I have never heard of an engine fire in normal cruise.
On the other hand, cargo fire in cruise is a more significant risk. The cargo fire switches are different.
On the other hand, cargo fire in cruise is a more significant risk. The cargo fire switches are different.