Community
Wiki Posts
Search

I Think I may Have Had It With BA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2018, 2:01 am
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 26,871
BA has lost every arbitration / MCOL claim I am aware of on downgrades, albeit with the person involved having to sign a confidentiality agreement.

It gets pricey too since, as arbitration cannot award Avios, the passenger gets the number of Avios due x BAs inflated 1.6p selling price.

You could ask why they continue to behave like this when their success rate in court is nil ......
Dambus and Silver Fox like this.
Raffles is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 2:02 am
  #32  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,830
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
I would have thought that a claim for a 75% reimbursement would have little chance of failure if a claim was lodged via MCOL Has BA actually won cases that the downgrade is not entitled to the reimbursement?
I'm not aware of a case where it has gone all the way to a hearing (as opposed to arbitration) on that one, and I think it's unlikely they would do so.

However the quote that you give from downgrading is probably not the strongest line of argument (though certainly valid as a supporting line) since what BA does in these situation is cancel the ticket and then issues a new ticket in the lower class and refunds the delta (or offers a full refund). You are then ticketed as J class and at that point your booking doesn't point to a downgrade in terms of what the "purchased" ticket is stating, and you will be familiar with the ensuing argument. So the "comparable" conditions on Article 8, rather than Article 10, would be the better approach in my view.

I'd be surprised if more than a dozen people are negatively affected by this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 2:11 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: England
Programs: Mucci des Epices Exotiques, BAEC Gold,EK Gold,SPG,Marriott,Club Carlson
Posts: 918
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
But EC261 does not make that distinction. In court cases that I've seen BA have attempted to portray the alternative arrangement as "comparable", even if it is a different class of travel (after all there are no shortage of people in this forum who do the same when it comes to Qatar!). But clearly it isn't difficult for passengers to argue the case that F = F.
This could indeed be tacit confirmation by BA that QR J = BA F
To Eat.To Drink is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 2:18 am
  #34  
Community Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,478
Originally Posted by To Eat.To Drink


This could indeed be tacit confirmation by BA that QR J = BA F
In my case they claimed that VS J = BA F simply because (a) they called it "Upper Class" and (b) it was the highest class VS offered, just as F was with BA.

With that sort of logic floating around the BA legal department, I imagine the marketing people might sometimes like to get their hands on them ...
To Eat.To Drink likes this.
NWIFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 2:20 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 540
Originally Posted by Worcester
I do so love a Happy Ending...
except for the Death in Pardise bit. Father Dougal can't act for toffee in the new series.
Silver Fox likes this.
Dubh is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 2:21 am
  #36  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,607
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
I'm not aware of a case where it has gone all the way to a hearing (as opposed to arbitration) on that one, and I think it's unlikely they would do so.

However the quote that you give from downgrading is probably not the strongest line of argument (though certainly valid as a supporting line) since what BA does in these situation is cancel the ticket and then issues a new ticket in the lower class and refunds the delta (or offers a full refund). You are then ticketed as J class and at that point your booking doesn't point to a downgrade in terms of what the "purchased" ticket is stating, and you will be familiar with the ensuing argument. So the "comparable" conditions on Article 8, rather than Article 10, would be the better approach in my view.

I'd be surprised if more than a dozen people are negatively affected by this.
What was purchased by the passenger was a 1st class ticket regardless of what BA unilaterally chooses to do. It doesn't say "in a lower cabin than ticketed" but lower than purchased. I would be extremely surprised if BA could come close to winning it

It doesn't matter how many are affected with a systemic issue - there shouldn't be a policy to try screwing passengers over
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 2:41 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,500
Yeah, there's no defence BA can muster other than a trolling exercise in an attempt to rip off people who don't know their rights. Pretty terrible, especially when you consider there'll be less than 100 people affected.
710 77345 is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 3:04 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver. London Cycling Campaign. TfL Oyster
Posts: 716
I do hope the srbrennas continue to fly in the comfort they deserve, regardless of carrier
NoTiersForMe is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 3:11 am
  #39  
Fontaine d'honneur du Flyertalk
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Morbihan, France
Programs: Reine des Muccis de Pucci; Foreign Elitist (according to others)
Posts: 19,180
Originally Posted by Worcester
I do so love a Happy Ending...
Watching Death in Paradise is no happy ending to me, I'd rather watch paint dry.I don't doubt that German TV will buy it and ogle it, as Inspector Barnaby shows no sign of running out of steam. Maybe with all the money that he is going to receive from BA, he can go and get a recording device or subscribe to Catch Up. My lifeline for Engrenages and Peaky Blinders (amongst many according to Lord Candy Crush aka HI).

Frankly, had I had some of this nonsense, I would have gone a long time ago. I sometimes have a hankering to see whether the grass is any greener elsewhere. Then I remember some of the wonderful service I have "enjoyed" elsewhere. I really do not care to make stops unless it saves me £££ - ex Dub comes to mind. In the past year I sampled the delights of AA International. No thanks. Lufthansa I will never fly again at my own expense. Alitalia I would not cross the road to fly. Ultimately, I wind up back at BA's door as they seem to suit me.

Ultimately, it's your money, and if it is not appreciated then why stay? If I were to buy a car, a TV - anythiing that caused me grief and hours on the phone - I would not repeat the mistake I made in the first place. I have long wondered why there was so much animosity, fair or otherwise. I think that BD enters the mix here, as I cannot believe why so many people seem to want to fly to or LBA. BA used to years ago, but domestic flights have never made money for them. Nevertheless a lot of this is a Flyertalk phenomenon as 95% of the travelling public have never set foot in F let alone had a broken seat.
PUCCI GALORE is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 3:46 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,076
Originally Posted by haroon145

in this case unfortunately the latest guidelines which were published was rebooking in lowest business class booking class available with a refund in the difference of avios
Under EC 261, shouldn't the rebooking or refund be the passenger's choice?
mec72 is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 3:58 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,399
Originally Posted by PUCCI GALORE

.................................................

..............................


Nevertheless a lot of this is a Flyertalk phenomenon as 95% of the travelling public have never set foot in F let alone had a broken seat.
I really don’t know whether your speculative percentage here is right or wrong. But I guess it can’t be too far off the mark, so let’s go with it. That said, I do feel that your reference to some sort of ‘Flyertalk phenomenon’ is something of a distraction, when essentially it’s all about good customer service - a matter that has, rightly, occupied the attention and interest of consumers long before the days of FT.


The very fact that maybe only 5% of those travelling will do so in First Class cabins is what places such a serious obligation on the supplier : anyone sitting in that section of an aircraft (especially those doing so with their own money) has every right to expect high standards of service - and a professional response to grievances when things go wrong. Ideally, without the need to resort to legal channels.


It’s perhaps a naïve thought, I know .... but I often find myself wondering just what sort of airline BA could become, if their approach to cases such as this (and indeed many others), were shaped by better principles.


I’m thinking of principles where the start point is how can we resolve a legitimate claim/grievance promptly and pro-actively, and thus meet our obligations, to the customer’s satisfaction ; as distinct from let’s obfuscate and prevaricate as much as possible, in the hope that he/she may give up in frustration and/or despair, and simply goes away.

The current policy may be effective in keeping a little more money in the BA coffers ; a more ethical corporate mindset would, I firmly believe, yield far greater rewards over the longer term.

Stez and hugolover like this.
subject2load is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 4:09 am
  #42  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,830
Originally Posted by mec72
Under EC 261, shouldn't the rebooking or refund be the passenger's choice?
The refund referred to in the quote is the difference between J and F. But BA is OK with the general principle of offering a refund or rebooking, the only time I've encountered problems there is when they prematurely stop flying altogether to a location with no sensible oneworld alternative: that announcement comes quickly, negotiating an arrangement with alternative airlines often takes weeks. For J redemptions on DOH they were rebooked into J on QR, so no issue there. The worst affected in this area, in my personal view, were not F customer - it was those passengers who booked into BA WTP, since QR doesn't offer such a product. They were downgraded to QR Economy and the refund - EC261 or otherwise - barely covers it.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 4:19 am
  #43  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: BA Gold, several other less interesting cards...
Posts: 3,712
Originally Posted by Dubh
except for the Death in Pardise bit. Father Dougal can't act for toffee in the new series.
Despite people always complaining about it and predicting its demise, it is still going strong and is very successful. But enough about BA.....
srbrenna is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 4:29 am
  #44  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: BA Gold, several other less interesting cards...
Posts: 3,712
Originally Posted by PUCCI GALORE
Watching Death in Paradise is no happy ending to me, I'd rather watch paint dry.I don't doubt that German TV will buy it and ogle it, as Inspector Barnaby shows no sign of running out of steam. Maybe with all the money that he is going to receive from BA, he can go and get a recording device or subscribe to Catch Up. My lifeline for Engrenages and Peaky Blinders (amongst many according to Lord Candy Crush aka HI).
I really must call your judgement into question for a second time (the first instance being a preference for Bombay and Slim over the superior Gordon's Export and Schweppes). Death in Paradise is a vastly superior program. The fact that this is not universally recognised is a national tragedy.

Originally Posted by PUCCI GALORE
Frankly, had I had some of this nonsense, I would have gone a long time ago. I sometimes have a hankering to see whether the grass is any greener elsewhere. Then I remember some of the wonderful service I have "enjoyed" elsewhere. I really do not care to make stops unless it saves me £££ - ex Dub comes to mind. In the past year I sampled the delights of AA International. No thanks. Lufthansa I will never fly again at my own expense. Alitalia I would not cross the road to fly. Ultimately, I wind up back at BA's door as they seem to suit me.
In my defence, Yout Magnificence, I did say this was a rant and I would continue to fly BA. I will, however, consider the options before loyally giving them my money. Not that they've had much of it this year...
srbrenna is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2018, 5:15 am
  #45  
Fontaine d'honneur du Flyertalk
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Morbihan, France
Programs: Reine des Muccis de Pucci; Foreign Elitist (according to others)
Posts: 19,180
Originally Posted by srbrenna
I really must call your judgement into question for a second time (the first instance being a preference for Bombay and Slim over the superior Gordon's Export and Schweppes). Death in Paradise is a vastly superior program. The fact that this is not universally recognised is a national tragedy.



In my defence, Yout Magnificence, I did say this was a rant and I would continue to fly BA. I will, however, consider the options before loyally giving them my money. Not that they've had much of it this year...
Dearest - I never thought of it as a Rant - although you clearly have lost your head if you really think that about Death in Paradise and Gordons. I have that effect on people. You are only human. Resistance is futile.
I have a confession to make - I used to set the Sky box to watch Jerry Springer about 10 or more years ago. I used to watch it when I got back off a trip and I had to cover my mouth with a cushion as my cackles could be heard at Heathrow. That has been my guilty secret for years. Promise that you won't tell!

No, Dear - considering that we are but into very early February I doubt that they have had much of your money. If Mrs Sbrenna is further inconvenienced by your listening to the interminable sound of the BA Hold music (I'd suggest that should be changed as well but if it is as tedious as the Safety Video then that might not be such a good idea).
PUCCI GALORE is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.