Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BA = London Airways?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:22 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GLA
Programs: BAEC: Silver. Nothing else as TopCashBack trumps all hotel programs
Posts: 801
BA = London Airways?

Hi. I'm wondering, are there any other national carriers (in the developed world), that only fly internationally from one city? I can't find any. I don't understand why BA (Apparently the UK's national carrier) only fly through London. This isn't the case in other countries.
As a Glasgow based person, it's very frustrating that the only destination my national carrier fly's to is London. As I travel to the states a lot, I typically fly United, Delta or American. I mean of course, why would I voluntarily fly via London with a stop when I can fly direct? I'm just curious why BA is happy to loose my business? I would fly BA more if I could get the America from Glasgow, or Edinburgh, or Manchester etc etc and I am sure there are more like me. Most of the people I know in Glasgow who fly for business have status in an American carrier, not BA. Are BA aware that some people in the UK actually live in other places than London? It's a personal nuisance to me as my points are scattered across United, Delta and American. I hold status in each, but if BA were to fly other places than just London, I would be able to have top tier status. And (long haul) I actually quite like the BA product. Better than most American carriers anyway. (Although new the new Delta metal from Edinburgh is really nice).
Just curious as to why BA do this, and do any other national carriers do it the same way? Why make it difficult for me to use BA. Seems counter productive.
cupsandsaucers is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:25 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Programs: BAEC gold, Marriott gold, Hilton gold
Posts: 1,923
If Aer Lingus became part of OW I wouldn't mind flying via DUB and clearing US immigration there.
jahason is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:29 am
  #3  
dsf
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Godalming, Surrey, UK.
Programs: Nowt of note.
Posts: 1,628
Originally Posted by cupsandsaucers
Hi. I'm wondering, are there any other national carriers (in the developed world), that only fly internationally from one city? I can't find any.
CX?
dsf is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:31 am
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GLA
Programs: BAEC: Silver. Nothing else as TopCashBack trumps all hotel programs
Posts: 801
Originally Posted by dsf
CX?
trooper and pheonix254 like this.
cupsandsaucers is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:31 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,262
I wouldn't consider British Airways a national carrier. They are a privately owned airline with their Hub at London Heathrow, They'd most likely be bust if they were still a nationalised airline !
Calchas likes this.
mikeyfly is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:33 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,464
QR, OS, AY, TG? There are plenty more out there.
rossmacd is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:34 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,364
Originally Posted by cupsandsaucers
Hi. I'm wondering, are there any other national carriers (in the developed world), that only fly internationally from one city? I can't find any
In Europe, Finnair, Brussels Airlines, Aer Lingus, KLM, Iberia spring to mind. AF at some point tried to re-develop direct international flights from French provinces (the so called "bases de province" programme) but it has gone back on this. There are hap-hazard isolated odd routes still there but these are exceptions so I would add AF to the list.
You were born at the wrong time. You would need to go back to the pre-airliine liberalisation days where point-to-point flying ruled the day. Nowadays, hub-based network is the way for major carriers. Even in a decentralised country like Germany, LH found that it could no longer sustain international flights from multiple German airports took out of its network all flights other than those from its two hubs (FRA and MUC).
Calchas likes this.
NickB is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:46 am
  #8  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,821
Originally Posted by NickB
. Even ina decentralised country like Germany, LH found that it could no longer sustain international flights from multiple German airports took out of its network all flights other than those from its two hubs (FRA and MUC).
In a way Germany points to another problem here: in Germany the LCC have very little leverage compared to the rest of Europe, with less choice and higher fares as a result, not that German consumers seem too worried about that, judging by the response to airberlin's failure. The one advantage of BA's approach is that LCC can offer direct services in competition, and BA needs to keep on their toes with fares if they want to stay in the market. Sometimes fares from GLA/INV/NCL are below that of London prices if there is the perception of leakage to (e.g.) KLM-AF. If BA had a total stranglehold on the UK market then I doubt that would be in anyone's long term interest.
Porky Speedpig likes this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:46 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,200
The concept of a 'national carrier' is long dead. Based on passenger numbers Easy Jet is the UK national carrier!

It simply comes down to economics. BA finds it more economic (profitable) to funnel passengers through LHR and LGW (which geographically is in West Sussex not London) and can offer more services - by operating the hub and spoke model - than if it flew internationally from other UK Airports.


ISTBC but I think KLM only flies to the US from AMS though of course it is a much smaller country than the UK.
UKtravelbear is online now  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:49 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,188
Even Swiss is downsizing its GVA hub and centralizing into ZRH
JALlover is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:51 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Ambassador, Starbucks Gold,
Posts: 624
Originally Posted by cupsandsaucers
As a Glasgow based person, it's very frustrating that the only destination my national carrier fly's to is London. As I travel to the states a lot, I typically fly United, Delta or American. I mean of course, why would I voluntarily fly via London with a stop when I can fly direct? I'm just curious why BA is happy to loose my business? I would fly BA more if I could get the America from Glasgow, or Edinburgh, or Manchester etc etc and I am sure there are more like me. Most of the people I know in Glasgow who fly for business have status in an American carrier, not BA. Are BA aware that some people in the UK actually live in other places than London? It's a personal nuisance to me as my points are scattered across United, Delta and American. I hold status in each, but if BA were to fly other places than just London, I would be able to have top tier status. And (long haul) I actually quite like the BA product. Better than most American carriers anyway. (Although new the new Delta metal from Edinburgh is really nice).
Just curious as to why BA do this, and do any other national carriers do it the same way? Why make it difficult for me to use BA. Seems counter productive.
So many issues with this...
BA is not the national carrier - can we please stop referring to it as such?
BA dont care about making your life easier - they care about making a profit.
BA dont care about your business - they care about big bucks of which you are small fry (as we all are individually)
BA are aware that people live outside of London and they do fly to other places in the UK (INV, ABZ, GLA, EDI, NCL, MAN, BFS)

They are a hub and spoke outfit, with a massive hub at LHR, and smaller ones at LGW and LCY. It makes sense to feed into one as they increase their margins and viability of routes. You have the options to go elsewhere, and fly with other carriers, so do that if you want to.

But think about it on the flipside - in the states, there are many places that you have to fly into to connect onto an international flight to the UK, yet we have some relatively random routes from the UK to what are, for us, small places. Bet those people feel the same as you. You cannot have all routes to all places.

Bottom line is, with a country of population more than 5 times smaller than the USA, you cannot expect it to be able to support such a wide spread regional international market as in the States. That is the reason that BA have London as a hub - simply because there are more people there to sustain the flights. There are more people in greater London than the whole of Scotland!
MrMutton is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:54 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,925
Any time BA tries to expand its offering from Glasgow the take up is poor and the flights are quickly discontinued, as per the Salzburg flights a years or so ago, I believe some European cities other than London may be getting served from EDI and/or MAN, especially at the weekends over the summer but I could be wrong.
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 5:56 am
  #13  
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,968
Ba through BA cityflyer do seem to be flying more from regional airports (MAN, BRS, BHX, EDI) direct in to Europe, there is a thread here about them New CityFlyer routes from Manchester
KARFA is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 6:01 am
  #14  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Why do people still refer to BA as the "national carrier"? Not only is it not, but it has not been such for many, many years.

BA operates for the benefit of its shareholders.

If you give your custom to BA because you believe that the term "British" means that it is British, than your custom is misplaced.
Often1 is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 6:02 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OSL
Posts: 2,646
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear
ISTBC but I think KLM only flies to the US from AMS though of course it is a much smaller country than the UK.
?? KLM has a significant Asian network, flies to several African destinations and South America as well.
dodgeflyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.