FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   British Airways | Executive Club (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/british-airways-executive-club-446/)
-   -   Buy on board: Implemented on BA short haul - opinions on the concept (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/british-airways-executive-club/1793630-buy-board-implemented-ba-short-haul-opinions-concept.html)

orbitmic Sep 29, 2016 1:06 pm


Originally Posted by 'andad (Post 27280285)
I heard this. When asked if BA is now a LCC, he replied that there are "millions, millions of differences between BA & the airline you mentioned" (that was a ref to EasyJet from the questioner).

Not entirely wrong:

- Low cost airlines are much cheaper than BA;
- Low cost airlines are far more punctual than BA;
- On the whole, to my surprise, several low cost airlines such as U2 have much better standard customer service than BA (it's a bit different for those of us with access to the GGL line). Bizarrely, even a recent experience with FR was much better too.

0415Z again... Sep 29, 2016 1:07 pm


Originally Posted by BAMuc (Post 27280824)
As disappointing as this is - and I do value my in-flight G&T very much (just not at 6GBP...) - surely this just shows how BA has given up on SH and now focuses exclusive on LH - with ET/CE's only raison d'etre being to "feed" the hub? It's not dissimilar to the whole Eurowings strategy; maybe Vueling steps in soon for intra-European flights?

LH still feeds both FRA and MUC with 'proper' LH flights from GOT (Regional in the case of MUC, probably the first to go to Eurowings here if you ask me, DUS is already Eurowings). I'm not sure it's a conscious strategy by Lufty, or it's German conservatism at work.

Fruitcake Sep 29, 2016 1:08 pm

Well, I find this very disappointing.

It's not so much charging for a wider / better food offering but the loss of a 'free' drink. That's part of BA's brand appeal, and part of its fly to serve mantra. Hard to distinguish now.

orbitmic Sep 29, 2016 1:10 pm


Originally Posted by BAMuc (Post 27280824)
surely this just shows how BA has given up on SH and now focuses exclusive on LH - with ET/CE's only raison d'etre being to "feed" the hub? It's not dissimilar to the whole Eurowings strategy

I disagree on both counts: It is completely different from 2U: first LH has kept full service on network flights and only moved part low cost on non-hub, while BA is moving low cost for everything, and second, 2U only is low cost on cheapest fares, BA on all of them including European connections from Y and W and domestic connections from J and F. In that sense, it suggests that BA is not focusing on long haul as the changes will impact long haul connecting customers even more than short haul p2p ones (when you fly as part of a long trip you are far more dehydrated, and with BA's recent changes hungry too).

BAMuc Sep 29, 2016 1:11 pm


Originally Posted by 0415Z again... (Post 27280847)
I'm not sure it's a conscious strategy by Lufty, or it's German conservatism at work.

Apparently conscious; also has to do with crew contracts etc. - I highly doubt LH is making any money whatsoever on the hub feeder flights if connections are taken out of the equation.

BA6501 Sep 29, 2016 1:12 pm


Originally Posted by orbitmic (Post 27280840)
On the whole, to my surprise, several low cost airlines such as U2 have much better standard customer service than BA (it's a bit different for those of us with access to the GGL line). Bizarrely, even a recent experience with FR was much better too.

Even Air Europa answered the phone on a non-premium number within 10 seconds of me dialling... on at least 10 occasions!

kaizenflying Sep 29, 2016 1:12 pm

I echo the disappointment about the BoB announcement but this has been a strategic Cruz step all along and it won't stop at catering. Food offering on short haul has seriously reduced in recent months to push us towards the "I'd like to buy on board, please" and has nothing to do with what customers have said.

The lounges are marked next and one muted Cruz option is to strategically decrease space to claim they are at capacity = deny entry for Health and Safety reasons.

And don't think all economy paid-for check-in bags is far, either. And then there's EuroTraveller Plus as the next marketing plan. Pay us extra and you'll get back your free crisps or biscuits.

We're not happy but I will say the M and S choices look good. Let's not start seeing Ryanair as the best thing. It's not. Easyjet is good but I hate LGW which cannot cope with the pressure of so many LCCs operating.

Time to move on from short haul BoB and to put pressure on BA to actually understand the word 'enhancements' in favour of its premium cabins. BA seems to understand enhancements as the positive spin on cuts. It should truly mean an improvement and they are failing to deliver on that in Club World and Premium Economy.

gpb_croppers63 Sep 29, 2016 1:13 pm


Originally Posted by 0415Z again... (Post 27280847)
LH still feeds both FRA and MUC with 'proper' LH flights from GOT (Regional in the case of MUC, probably the first to go to Eurowings here if you ask me, DUS is already Eurowings). I'm not sure it's a conscious strategy by Lufty, or it's German conservatism at work.

It is a conscious strategy from LH to keep EW away from the hubs. That said, EW is supposedly coming to MUC very soon so watch this space. For the moment, I'll certainly be sticking to LCCs and Star Alliance until airlines there follow suit. At least BA short haul remains in OneWorld (until it becomes Vueling) unlike EW with LH so that's one small mercy.

BAMuc Sep 29, 2016 1:14 pm


Originally Posted by orbitmic (Post 27280860)
I disagree on both counts: It is completely different from 2U: first LH has kept full service on network flights and only moved part low cost on non-hub, while BA is moving low cost for everything, and second, 2U only is low cost on cheapest fares, BA on all of them including European connections from Y and W and domestic connections from J and F. In that sense, it suggests that BA is not focusing on long haul as the changes will impact long haul connecting customers even more than short haul p2p ones (when you fly as part of a long trip you are far more dehydrated, and with BA's recent changes hungry too).

True; but BA might think that not many long-haul customers actually care about food/drink on their feeder flights to switch airlines altogether ... and the relevant margins are sitting in an "enhanced" CE cabin anyway.

ianwall Sep 29, 2016 1:21 pm

Do we have enough old threads on here to build catering timeline? BA can get away with saying "people wanted better food", compared the individually wrapped crisp we know and love.

It doesn't seem that long ago though, we were getting a hot evening meal on Domestics and reasonably descent sandwiches for free. January's cold, paid-for carb fest, cannot be marketed as an upgrade from that.

Why would O&D passengers, with a choice of London airports, choose BA / LHR anymore? I used to pay the premium and spend hours on the Piccadilly line getting there because I liked GF more than than the PP lounges elsewhere. The drink / snack onboard was nice. Not anymore.

Hello FR :)

A P Yu Sep 29, 2016 1:27 pm

Will there be Euro prices too or will all our European cousins also have to pay an overseas transaction fee?

Far Siren Sep 29, 2016 1:28 pm

The loss of food and alcoholic beverages is disappointing though I can do without them. God knows we all eat & drink more than necessary in the lounges anyway.

But charging for water & coffee - that, in my book, is unacceptable.

simons1 Sep 29, 2016 1:31 pm


Originally Posted by irishguy28 (Post 27280480)
I guess we have to concede the sobriquet of "flag carrier" to Beardy now that he runs the only British full-service airline?

He must be loving it all. Laughing himself senseless.

hugolover Sep 29, 2016 1:31 pm

Time for another LH status match ☺️

Padmeister Sep 29, 2016 1:35 pm


Originally Posted by Far Siren (Post 27280960)
The loss of food and alcoholic beverages is disappointing though I can do without them. God knows we all eat & drink more than necessary in the lounges anyway.

But charging for water & coffee - that, in my book, is unacceptable.

Correct!

The average short haul flight is 2 hours so I am sure we will all survive it's not the end of the world. But like you say charging for water/tea/coffee is out of order.

allturnleft Sep 29, 2016 1:38 pm

Hiw many FTers actually fly BA Y SH
 
I must say I rarely fly BA SH Y as the offering has been poor for some time
I wobbled with CE when they changed the seats but continue to use if the price is good

For leisure SH I would always consider an LCC alternative if they offer a premium choice like extra leg room or pre order meals

I have recently flown flybe and i think their brand and offering now works ; love their 2 :2 seating

The question for me is what will they do with CE!

If that was downgraded BA would have made the complete LCC transition

MarcD Sep 29, 2016 1:38 pm

BOB food I can live with, but the loss of the free bar will be a big miss, as one of the many who are fans of a G&T on the shuttle back to NCL.

To think, it was only 3 years since 'The Friendly Lemon' advert...

CKBA Sep 29, 2016 1:39 pm


Originally Posted by herro (Post 27278662)
This one I can answer that Alex Cruz Tuesday stated on the press event that it will be contactless to speed up payment and also the reason for not receiving cash.

Oh great, and what about all those US customers whose DC/CC don't have contactless.... .

CKBA Sep 29, 2016 1:41 pm

So, given that I usually have a G&T and a snack each way, that's about $20 overall. Will the price I pay for the flight drop by $20?

bafan Sep 29, 2016 1:42 pm


Originally Posted by Skatering (Post 27280019)
So, at the risk of invoking the slippery slope fallacy, how long is it going to be before the lounge access policy is enhanced so that you don't get access on short haul? Which would be broadly similar to how it works with status passengers on US carriers.

I can see this coming next, too...

ianwall Sep 29, 2016 1:46 pm

Hang on ... is booze being removed from LCY from January?


London City and London Stansted

If you're travelling on any flight operated by our subsidiary BA CityFlyer to and from London City or London Stansted, you can continue to enjoy our complimentary food and drink service but can look forward to the 'M&S on board' menu in summer 2017.

Depending on the time and duration of your flight, we will offer you a light snack or something more substantial, along with a soft drink of your choice from the bar. If you have a specific dietary requirement, you're also able to request a special meal.
http://www.britishairways.com/en-gb/...economy-dining

HMPS Sep 29, 2016 1:54 pm


Originally Posted by CKBA (Post 27281024)
So, given that I usually have a G&T and a snack each way, that's about $20 overall. Will the price I pay for the flight drop by $20?

NO !
The money saved on cutting out freebies falls to the bottom line, the profit from you $ 20 will go to the bottom line.

Prices will not drop, share prices and bonuses will go up.

psollitt Sep 29, 2016 1:54 pm


Originally Posted by MarcD (Post 27281008)
BOB food I can live with, but the loss of the free bar will be a big miss, as one of the many who are fans of a G&T on the shuttle back to NCL.

To think, it was only 3 years since 'The Friendly Lemon' advert...


please everyone quote on the youtube ... :(

ZZ100 Sep 29, 2016 1:56 pm

What is the impact on Comair, does anyone know?

Calum Sep 29, 2016 2:00 pm

Can't wait to see Alex again... The easyJet pilot between LGW S & N:D

flyer200 Sep 29, 2016 2:02 pm

Like every other BA cut back, people come on FT, complain and don't change their flying patterns.

BA profits continue to rise.

GaxxyFlyer Sep 29, 2016 2:07 pm


Originally Posted by irishguy28 (Post 27279828)
I like that naming suggestion.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we will shortly be commencing our in-flight service. Customers in our some-form-of-business cabin will be offered a complimentary snack and bar service. Customers in our Hungry Traveller cabin will be able to select from our extensive buy-on-board menu, unless of course you don't have a contactless payment card or any Avios with you, in which case, you will stay hungry until we land in Istanbul in 3.5 hours/Athens in 3 hours, in which case you will resolve to travel with Turkish Airlines/Aegean Airlines next time

I'm sat in a restaurant in cluj not being particularly social as I work through this thread. This made me actually laugh out loud and I got some strange looks from my colleagues!

In seriousness, I've not got a single revenue ticket left with BA. I have some redemptions, some cityjet flights out of London city (still a complimentary drinks service) and some longhaul Qatar flights. We knew this was coming but I refuse to pay for a British airways flight because even in J you just don't know if you'll get the advertised service that you originally paid for.

I'll pay for BA flights when they make sense but after I hit silver again next year through Qatar I'll not chase it again. I see a PP on the horizon...

DFB_london Sep 29, 2016 2:10 pm


Originally Posted by orbitmic (Post 27280840)
Not entirely wrong:

- Low cost airlines are much cheaper than BA;
- Low cost airlines are far more punctual than BA;
- On the whole, to my surprise, several low cost airlines such as U2 have much better standard customer service than BA (it's a bit different for those of us with access to the GGL line). Bizarrely, even a recent experience with FR was much better too.

Yep Ryanair carries millions more people than BA

When I Travel The World Sep 29, 2016 2:14 pm

I guess the problem for me is that where i'm based in Bristol, Heathrow and BA are really my best options.

Luton & Stansted is a nightmare for me to reach. (3-5 hours) And luton is a mess right now.
Gatwick is all leisure flights mainly and does not have much use to me. and that's almost 4 hours away from me.

Bristol airport is useless and is all leisure flights.

So for me, even though I will miss the free food, BA still makes more sense for me and I really don't have much other choice to continue to fly them.

It only takes me under 2 hours to reach heathrow and a lot of the flight times work for me.

Guess I have to just suck it up.

rockflyertalk Sep 29, 2016 2:16 pm


Originally Posted by af101 (Post 27278559)
Sigh. Does nobody at BA actually care about the medium term?

This will save money in the short term.

But when your business is an airline, your primary product is getting people from A to B. Your differentiators are convenience and service. Why reduce the service?

The days of management teams thinking medium- long term with customers interests at heart are, very sadly, long gone amongst the multinationals.

We live in a business economy that require multi/corps to fulfil short term gains for stakeholders and high level managers to achieve bonuses, ROI and shareholder returns etc.

If Cruz signed a, say a 3 year CEO contract (hypothetically) then I imagine this is the start of how he can turn BA into a cash cow. Regardless of what longterm brand impact this has.

Clearly a tough market to operate in and I don't profess to know much about the market but from an overarching business strategy, in todays world this is all text book stuff.

The big impact has nothing to do with food. Regardless of how well the airline sells this change, with marketing like "upgrade" "improvement" "british brand alignment."

The "cash cow" in this case is the charging of drinks. This will drive potentially significant margins in revenue/profit. As any hospitality expert will tell you, alcohol has great margins for very little operational or if any man power costs (as crew are present for safety regardless of serving F&B or not). Food however has a very different financial model.

Alas, Cruz will revel in his pay packet and sign off bonus as margins improve for the short period during his tenancy.

Sad times for SH BA.

Calchas Sep 29, 2016 2:18 pm


Originally Posted by Banana4321 (Post 27280773)
I just submitted a Golden Ticket to Alex Cruz. Fine job that he needs recognition for from his manager :)

:D :D :D :D ^ ^

Eskimoboy Sep 29, 2016 2:20 pm


Originally Posted by flyer200 (Post 27281125)
Like every other BA cut back, people come on FT, complain and don't change their flying patterns.

BA profits continue to rise.


I am going to change my flying patterns, however I am a very very very small cog so I'm well aware it will make no difference to BA.

Might make me feel slightly better though ;-)

psollitt Sep 29, 2016 2:21 pm


Originally Posted by flyer200 (Post 27281125)
Like every other BA cut back, people come on FT, complain and don't change their flying patterns.

BA profits continue to rise.

mine have ... next two flights are back with KLM ! ...

stifle Sep 29, 2016 2:24 pm


Originally Posted by Flexible preferences (Post 27280067)
No, youre wrong. The requirement in the licence is for customers only. A good thing too with what pubs have been through in the last decade or so.

From Money Saving Expert: According to the Licensing Act 2003 (Mandatory Licensing Conditions) Order 2010, which came into force in April 2010 and was updated in 2014, all restaurants in England and Wales that serve alcohol are legally required to give customers free tap water (the legislation for Scotland is the same, but it's a different act). Those that don't are under no obligation to do so.

Anyway to be clear BA are providing free tap water.

Looking at the order itself rather than the MSE summary, it does not state that this is limited to paying customers.

Nimrod1965 Sep 29, 2016 2:25 pm


Originally Posted by ba_cityflyer (Post 27278311)
£1.80 for a water?

Bye bye, BA. No more short-haul revenue from me.

I think this is what easyJet charge for the same.

NWIFlyer Sep 29, 2016 2:27 pm


Originally Posted by rockflyertalk (Post 27281199)
The "cash cow" in this case is the charging of drinks. This will drive potentially significant margins in revenue/profit. As any hospitality expert will tell you, alcohol has great margins for very little operational or if any man power costs (as crew are present for safety regardless of serving F&B or not). Food however has a very different financial model.

Interesting - in the pub game, my understanding is that it's just the opposite, in that food brings by far the greater gross margin.

Nonetheless, the overall point is well made - ancillary sales are a very important part of the business models for LCCs, where BA is clearly hurtling headlong towards under Cruz, and a very significant revenue stream. I wonder how long it'll be until we get the BA scratchcard?

capin Sep 29, 2016 2:28 pm


Originally Posted by flyer200 (Post 27281125)
Like every other BA cut back, people come on FT, complain and don't change their flying patterns.

BA profits continue to rise.

Mine have changed, I now do my J/F flying on QR/CX for OW and EK/EY. These airlines are in a different class to BA. I really look forward to my next flight on these airlines.

ba bob Sep 29, 2016 2:30 pm

If anyone here thinks they can do a better job of this, BA are now looking to hire a new Head of Catering. Laughable really timing wise. Unless of course the current occupant had handed in their notice due to this change being forced upon them.

DFB_london Sep 29, 2016 2:33 pm

for anyone with any status is nt it just a matter of taking the canned drinks, water, and food from the lounge in future?

Quarky Quark Sep 29, 2016 2:39 pm

1 Attachment(s)
I can't vouch for the accuracy of the comment, but this twitter response did make me chuckle.
I've had a bit of a read through and BA are copping an absolute pasting online.
I feel a little for the Twitterers (is that even a word?) because it can't be an enjoyable role, although I wonder if they have a dice they roll that they use to choose the reply. All of them are canned responses.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:25 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.