Securing the cabin for take-off
#76
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Some of the comments on this thread are incredulous.
I really wouldn't dream of walking into your office on my first day, or depending on how high up in the organisation you are, ever, and tell you how I think you should do your job or dare to not comply with instructions from someone who I really should perceive to be more authorative than me on the subject. On my flights, if you don't comply or tut, or roll your eyes or not follow my crew's instructions then you will get a visit from me regardless of your status, socially or otherwise and then you'll get a visit from the Captain. This isn't about customer service, it's about making you comply with something that will possibly save your life and possibly those around you. The selfishness of some people is beyond belief.
Furthermore, the very last part of our evacuation training, before we leave the aircraft is to grab an emergency torch and possibly a smokehood and play the hero, i.e. go back into that smoke-filled cabin or crushed up wreck of a plane to make sure you've all left it successfully. Don't put my life in further danger by making me go back for someone who's not had their seat or hand baggage where it should be or failed to follow mine or my crew's instructions.
Unbelievable!
I really wouldn't dream of walking into your office on my first day, or depending on how high up in the organisation you are, ever, and tell you how I think you should do your job or dare to not comply with instructions from someone who I really should perceive to be more authorative than me on the subject. On my flights, if you don't comply or tut, or roll your eyes or not follow my crew's instructions then you will get a visit from me regardless of your status, socially or otherwise and then you'll get a visit from the Captain. This isn't about customer service, it's about making you comply with something that will possibly save your life and possibly those around you. The selfishness of some people is beyond belief.
Furthermore, the very last part of our evacuation training, before we leave the aircraft is to grab an emergency torch and possibly a smokehood and play the hero, i.e. go back into that smoke-filled cabin or crushed up wreck of a plane to make sure you've all left it successfully. Don't put my life in further danger by making me go back for someone who's not had their seat or hand baggage where it should be or failed to follow mine or my crew's instructions.
Unbelievable!
#77
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,500
Some of the comments on this thread are incredulous.
I really wouldn't dream of walking into your office on my first day, or depending on how high up in the organisation you are, ever, and tell you how I think you should do your job or dare to not comply with instructions from someone who I really should perceive to be more authorative than me on the subject.
I really wouldn't dream of walking into your office on my first day, or depending on how high up in the organisation you are, ever, and tell you how I think you should do your job or dare to not comply with instructions from someone who I really should perceive to be more authorative than me on the subject.
I would urge anyone to challenge me if I was doing something dangerous when working, no matter your 'standing' - intervening is something that isn't usually pleasant but it is preferable to being injured. ItsACrewLife - please reconsider being more open, even if it means listening politely whilst someone who isn't aware of all the rules challenges you when you're doing something that is quite correct - listening is a really important part of a successful safety culture and I (at least) find myself in dangerous situations inadvertently from time to time.
#78
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,286
Safety is everyone's business and I would expect to be challenged by any customer or fellow crewmember who was concerned, likewise I will challenge and enforce all safety related requirements.
#79
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Silver, Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles Platinum
Posts: 2,383
On my sole Vueling flight seat aisle, last row, I accidentally forgot to do my seatbelt. Very unlike me, and I didn't realise until landing.
No member of crew spotted this, which should have been instantly visible as belt was hanging in aisle.
Made me very uncomfortable to be flying them, and will not fly again!
No member of crew spotted this, which should have been instantly visible as belt was hanging in aisle.
Made me very uncomfortable to be flying them, and will not fly again!
#81
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,075
No one is perfect and everyone makes mistakes or omissions. No- one is above being challenged where safety is concerned.
However, it is not for passengers to try to start arguments about safety procedures when on an aircraft. The law is quite clear in this respect - the person responsible for safety, security and regularity of the flight is the captain, no-one else, and oddly that means that the captain's commands (delegated to the crew) become the law on the aircraft. If you want to start an argument regarding safety procedures onboard an aircraft you are risking being arrested and, at best, being significantly inconvenienced.
By all means question safety procedures to the company from the calm and quiet of your study, by letter or e-mail, but not ever onboard, it will not matter whether subsequent events prove that you have a valid point or not.
However, it is not for passengers to try to start arguments about safety procedures when on an aircraft. The law is quite clear in this respect - the person responsible for safety, security and regularity of the flight is the captain, no-one else, and oddly that means that the captain's commands (delegated to the crew) become the law on the aircraft. If you want to start an argument regarding safety procedures onboard an aircraft you are risking being arrested and, at best, being significantly inconvenienced.
By all means question safety procedures to the company from the calm and quiet of your study, by letter or e-mail, but not ever onboard, it will not matter whether subsequent events prove that you have a valid point or not.
#83
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: Mucci de la Cuisine Arienne du Rseau Courte Dure de British Airways
Posts: 4,704
If a passenger is worried about any safety related issue, I would encourage them to ask the crew, who will either explain, rectify or pass their concerns on to the Captain.
Last edited by Littlegirl; Jan 6, 2016 at 8:57 am
#84
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,075
It's just that there is no place to go if you, as a passenger, don't agree with the response you get. Onboard the aircraft it is not a democracy - the rule of law still applies, it's just that the arbiter of that law is the captain. So, like it or it, we must all obey their instructions onboard. The place for a debate about procedures etc is on the ground and it is held with the company, not the crew on the day
#85
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,286
Much clearer Waterhorse, make the crew aware of your concerns calmly and if they are in any doubt they will check with the Captain who has will decide if there is any cause for concern.
#86
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,500
I'm obviously not explaining what I mean very well. I totally agree with you, there is nothing wrong with a calm query - as I said we all make mistakes. But there is no place for a debate onboard, query things by all means.
It's just that there is no place to go if you, as a passenger, don't agree with the response you get.
It's just that there is no place to go if you, as a passenger, don't agree with the response you get.
I had a crew member tell me that I couldn't take a photograph of the meal served to me for security reasons. I told her I was fairly sure I could, and would appreciate if she could double check.
She came back to me later and repeated that I wasn't allowed to do it and must cease.
I escalated to the CSD who was great, and of course was aware of the correct rules. But if I'd accepted what I'd been told with no debate then it wouldn't have been properly resolved.
Another example was when a crew member went against the printed instructions on a cabin divider, putting it in to a different position to that stated for take-off.
She said it was fine, but I hope you don't think I was being unreasonable by extending the debate by checking this later with the CSM (who said the printed signs on the cabin dividers were just wrong, and they were indeed different to other sister aircraft in the fleet).
I would hope it's possible to politely challenge and escalate without causing an unacceptable scene, even if the passenger is totally in the wrong.
Last edited by 710 77345; Jan 6, 2016 at 10:24 am
#87
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,286
Commanders are authorised to stop any filming or photography, authorised or not, if it compromises: • Safety or security;
• The comfort and wellbeing of other passengers.
The circumstances of unauthorised filming which the Commander orders to be stopped should be reported in an ASR.
• The comfort and wellbeing of other passengers.
The circumstances of unauthorised filming which the Commander orders to be stopped should be reported in an ASR.
#88
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
But what if the answer you get is wrong?
I had a crew member tell me that I couldn't take a photograph of the meal served to me for security reasons. I told her I was fairly sure I could, and would appreciate if she could double check.
She came back to me later and repeated that I wasn't allowed to do it and must cease.
I escalated to the CSD who was great, and of course was aware of the correct rules. But if I'd accepted what I'd been told with no debate then it wouldn't have been properly resolved.
Another example was when a crew member went against the printed instructions on a cabin divider, putting it in to a different position to that stated for take-off.
She said it was fine, but I hope you don't think I was being unreasonable by extending the debate by checking this later with the CSM (who said the printed signs on the cabin dividers were just wrong, and they were indeed different to other sister aircraft in the fleet).
I had a crew member tell me that I couldn't take a photograph of the meal served to me for security reasons. I told her I was fairly sure I could, and would appreciate if she could double check.
She came back to me later and repeated that I wasn't allowed to do it and must cease.
I escalated to the CSD who was great, and of course was aware of the correct rules. But if I'd accepted what I'd been told with no debate then it wouldn't have been properly resolved.
Another example was when a crew member went against the printed instructions on a cabin divider, putting it in to a different position to that stated for take-off.
She said it was fine, but I hope you don't think I was being unreasonable by extending the debate by checking this later with the CSM (who said the printed signs on the cabin dividers were just wrong, and they were indeed different to other sister aircraft in the fleet).
#89
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold; FB Silver; SPG; IHG Gold
Posts: 3,015
But what if the answer you get is wrong?
I had a crew member tell me that I couldn't take a photograph of the meal served to me for security reasons. I told her I was fairly sure I could, and would appreciate if she could double check.
She came back to me later and repeated that I wasn't allowed to do it and must cease.
I escalated to the CSD who was great, and of course was aware of the correct rules. But if I'd accepted what I'd been told with no debate then it wouldn't have been properly resolved.
Another example was when a crew member went against the printed instructions on a cabin divider, putting it in to a different position to that stated for take-off.
She said it was fine, but I hope you don't think I was being unreasonable by extending the debate by checking this later with the CSM (who said the printed signs on the cabin dividers were just wrong, and they were indeed different to other sister aircraft in the fleet).
I would hope it's possible to politely challenge and escalate without causing an unacceptable scene, even if the passenger is totally in the wrong.
I had a crew member tell me that I couldn't take a photograph of the meal served to me for security reasons. I told her I was fairly sure I could, and would appreciate if she could double check.
She came back to me later and repeated that I wasn't allowed to do it and must cease.
I escalated to the CSD who was great, and of course was aware of the correct rules. But if I'd accepted what I'd been told with no debate then it wouldn't have been properly resolved.
Another example was when a crew member went against the printed instructions on a cabin divider, putting it in to a different position to that stated for take-off.
She said it was fine, but I hope you don't think I was being unreasonable by extending the debate by checking this later with the CSM (who said the printed signs on the cabin dividers were just wrong, and they were indeed different to other sister aircraft in the fleet).
I would hope it's possible to politely challenge and escalate without causing an unacceptable scene, even if the passenger is totally in the wrong.
An example would be if someone were to tell me not to take pictures of food for security reasons, as per the above poster. I must say that this sounds like a very odd request, and one that I would challenge too. I do not understand how CC could possibly consider this a security risk, albeit I may be missing some important context.
Last edited by South London Bon Viveur; Jan 11, 2016 at 5:07 pm
#90
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,500