Community
Wiki Posts
Search

what's the point of gold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2014, 5:04 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: BA GCH
Posts: 3
what's the point of gold

As a gold card holder i pre booked extra legroom seats for myself and my pregnant sister on a recent flight to Antigua (as she was pregnant the choice of additional legroom as very limited!). On boarding plane there was a family sitting in our seats. When queried the onboard manager was trying to be helpful but effectively wasnt. Unless I was prepared to make a woman have her small child on her lap the whole flight. So we were moved to new seats where the back seat screen fell into my lap everytime the guy in front sat back in his seat (often, he was flirting with a group of ladies!).
This was a disappointing experience. I should not have been able to book those seats if they should be for families. I should have got better service as a gold card otherwise what is the point in all this loyalty.
I wrote to the exec team (ref 12494227) and had a curt reply saying yes that must have been annoying but hey ho. No fix suggested. Disappointed with the response (that took over a month to come to me). Am I being unreasonable?!
emsred is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 5:13 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: in a cabin
Posts: 6,526
Hello and welcome to Flyertalk and the BAEC forum.

Sorry that your dbut came from a poor experience. However, many of us started out that way and then realised there is much to learn from FT and have stayed. We hope you stick around.

Just to clarify, did you hold Boarding Passes with your original seats when entering the plane, or had your seats been changed at check-in or at some stage before the flight?

Either way it sounds like a poor show by BA judging by their response. Unfortunately the front rows in WT/WT+ cabins there is the risk of getting booted by those traveling with infants so this one you'll just have to suck up and move on.
Petrus is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 5:41 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MAN/BHX
Programs: ABBA
Posts: 6,027
You're not being unreasonable (but this isn't mumsnet). I was booted from an exit row to a middle seat further back last year on a Singapore to London flight. The Qantas gold-card-equivelent guy sat next to me was also booted out. I suspect it was a checkin person at Sydney putting their family in the good seats.

Complaining to BA netted 25,000 worthless avios, but at least it was something.

However that happened at checkin. If someone was sat in your seat, and you had a boarding pass for that seat, the on board crew should have intervened. BA isn't ryanair, it's not a first-come-first-served flight.

This statement:
Unless I was prepared to make a woman have her small child on her lap the whole flight.
Well tough. If they didn't spend the money on a seat, why should you suffer?

Very poor handling on board, very poor response from BA. Escalate again.

Your treatment has literally made my blood boil.

However on a lighter term, it sounds from your post you were flying back in economy. Stick around here and economy will only be a tale you can tell your nephew/neice at Halloween
paulwuk is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 5:47 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: East Anglia, England
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 2,056
Welcome!

I don't think you are being unreasonable. However, there may be very good reasons for seat changes, though in this instance I am on the fence whether it was (I rather dislike people using their children as a sword [and a shield for that matter]). I would chase BA again and note the specific circumstances of the people flying with you and all the other relevant details (again if already mentioned previously).

H
Hoch is online now  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 6:00 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,824
Originally Posted by paulwuk
Complaining to BA netted 25,000 worthless avios, but at least it was something.
Should you wish to be unencumbered of these worthless trinkets, I would gladly take them off your hands
irishguy28 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 6:26 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: BA Silver, several other less interesting cards...
Posts: 3,719
I don't think you're being unreasonable either. I'm assuming that the person chose to have the infant on their lap so I'm at a loss as to why you have to move

Write back to BA saying that as well as the first complaint being unsatisfactory, the reply is as well.
srbrenna is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 6:29 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,122
Originally Posted by irishguy28
Should you wish to be unencumbered of these worthless trinkets, I would gladly take them off your hands
And as a GGL can now be transferred for free too ^
lorcancoyle is online now  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 6:45 am
  #8  
nux
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: BA Gold, QF WP
Posts: 12,551
Originally Posted by lorcancoyle
And as a GGL can now be transferred for free too
Gold can also transfer for free.
nux is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 6:52 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold & GGL & CCR, HH Diam, Bonvoy Titanium, IHG Spire, Tastecard
Posts: 7,549
what's the point of gold

Welcome.

Over and above others' comments, would just add that the Gold card isn't overly relevant here. If you had reserved those seats, this shouldn't have happened even if you didn't have Gold.

A Gold card will not shield you from things going wrong (rightly or wrongly) and I would suggest that there is a lot of "point" to a Gold card over and above reserving seats.
chris1979 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 6:56 am
  #10  
Ambassador: World of Hyatt
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK - the nearest airport is named after a motorway !
Posts: 4,242
Originally Posted by paulwuk
Your treatment has literally made my blood boil.
Oh Paul. Don't give up. Us pedants must stand strong, a noble dyke against the tide of drivel. I'm sure that the future where we have given up the fight is just a little less sunny.

Originally Posted by some old bloke, with a way for words
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Stewie Mac is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 7:00 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL, BA Amex Prem, Amex Plat, Hilton Diamond, Sir Crazy8534 de l'ordres des aides de Pucci
Posts: 4,546
Sorry to disagree but if you are talking about a bassinet seat then these should be available for passengers with infants first, and then to other status passengers if not being used. If you have the ability to preassign such a seat then there is a risk that you will be booted out by a passenger + infant. There are limited numbers of these seats in each cabin. Expecting a mother to sit with her child on her lap for the whole transatlantic flight because the only available bassinet was reserved by a single traveller is unreasonable. Of note, passengers with infants have the ability to assign seats from the time of booking, in a similar way to GCH.

If you want to argue that BA should not have allowed you to assign yourself to that seat in the first place then I would agree with that, or if you are unhappy because you were allowed to board with a BP that showed a seat in which you wouldn't be able to sit then I understand that too.
crazy8534 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 7:05 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by Stewie Mac
Oh Paul. Don't give up. Us pedants must stand strong, a noble dyke against the tide of drivel. I'm sure that the future where we have given up the fight is just a little less sunny.
[Off topic: Today's anti-pedant xkcd is even better http://xkcd.com/1429/ ]
Calchas is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 7:05 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Programs: BA LTGold; LH Senator; HHGold; Bonvoy Plat
Posts: 1,370
Aside from the fact that the seat you ended up with had a defective screen that fell out of its housing (I assume thats what you mean - it did work?) - the seats you were moved to were never going to be as good as the extra legroom ones you originally requested.

You suggest it was your good grace to move, not wanting to force the mother to have the child on their lap for the whole flight. And clearly that was the only option available to the crew - one of you was going to have to suffer. What else could they have done?

Consequently, I don't think you can then complain that it is somehow BAs fault. You did a good deed, but I'm not sure what you are hoping too seek because of that good deed.There is little point being a good Samaritan if you spend the rest of the flight fuming and mentally drafting a big complaint letter to write when you get home.

I sympathise a bit, as I have been in similar situations, either a request to move or finding someone in my seat on boarding. It can make you feel awkward, not wanting to make a fuss etc. My first response is to find out what the alternatives are - and if roughly the same I'll just move. In a situation like this though I wouldn't never have done it, particularly with your pregnant partner. That family chose to book on 'on lap' ticket for their infant, not a separate seat which means they would have known there was a high probability of sitting with infant in lap through the flight.

I only think you'd have grounds for complaint if the crew forced your hand, and refused your request once you'd asserted your right to the seats you've booked.
ukgooner is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 7:05 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: East Anglia, England
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 2,056
Originally Posted by crazy8534
Sorry to disagree but if you are talking about a bassinet seat then these should be available for passengers with infants first, and then to other status passengers if not being used. If you have the ability to preassign such a seat then there is a risk that you will be booted out by a passenger + infant. There are limited numbers of these seats in each cabin. Expecting a mother to sit with her child on her lap for the whole transatlantic flight because the only available bassinet was reserved by a single traveller is unreasonable. Of note, passengers with infants have the ability to assign seats from the time of booking, in a similar way to GCH.
Without knowing whether this was an issue of the bassinet seat, I disagree with you in part. In part because the reasonable or correct thing to do would have been to ask the OP if they would not mind changing seats rather than just taking them. In any event, it should have been to the CC to try to resolve the matter.

I would also point out that not taking a bassinet seat when able to do so runs the risk of having a lap child for a long flight. It works both ways.

H
Hoch is online now  
Old Oct 3, 2014, 7:10 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
Originally Posted by Stewie Mac
Oh Paul. Don't give up. Us pedants must stand strong, a noble dyke against the tide of drivel. I'm sure that the future where we have given up the fight is just a little less sunny.
Don't mock the dead, which will certainly be the case if the poor chaps blood literally had boiled. God that must smell something awful.
Worcester is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.