BA 787 Dreamliner pre-delivery discussion thread
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,145
Interesting you should make a comparison with the Comet - another jet with oversized windows. Hope that's not a bad omen!
IIRC it was the windows on the Comet that were too big and the aircraft couldn't cope with the repeated pressurisation/depresserisation, although I'm sure this won't be a problem on the 787.
IIRC it was the windows on the Comet that were too big and the aircraft couldn't cope with the repeated pressurisation/depresserisation, although I'm sure this won't be a problem on the 787.
As to the 787, that will be for generations beyond mine to determine.
#18
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Balham - Gateway to The South
Programs: BA Bronze
Posts: 2,020
#19
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,668
#21
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,668
However, the certification process is just huge for these sort of products on civil aircraft and even more so for ETOPS flights so the amount of testing and result submissions and risk assessments already carried would have been massive.
I do believe the A380 uses them too but am not 100% sure...
#22
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Balham - Gateway to The South
Programs: BA Bronze
Posts: 2,020
Glad to hear it, always makes me think when one particular aircraft continually has problems....also glad to hear BA going to wait for 100 787 & 380's to roll off the line first. ^
#23
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,668
There have now been a number of electrical related faults and fuel leaks across a number of different aircraft now. Admittedly the sample size is still quite small but it would appear some resemblance of a pattern is emerging. I so hope not though
#24
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
I presume with the B787 it is necessary to start the APU inflight in the case of an engine or generator failure,which is not a requirement for the A380.If that is the case,and the APU battery has a fault that risks a fire on startup,that could prove very difficult for ETOPS approval.
It would be very unpleasant to have a battery fire mid pacific.
It would be very unpleasant to have a battery fire mid pacific.
#25
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,198
In flight, if three or more engine generators go offline, the APU automatically starts, regardless of APU selector position. When the automatic start condition is no longer valid, the APU can be shut down by positioning the selector to ON, then OFF. When the automatic start condition is valid, the APU can only be shut down by pulling the APU fire switch.
#26
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
In flight, if three or more engine generators go offline, the APU automatically starts, regardless of APU selector position. When the automatic start condition is no longer valid, the APU can be shut down by positioning the selector to ON, then OFF. When the automatic start condition is valid, the APU can only be shut down by pulling the APU fire switch.
#27
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Quite close to NQY
Programs: BAEC Silver,clubcard,clubcard plus, BA Amex................ And Mucci x3 ;)
Posts: 9,488
Im sorry I wasnt being 100% serious with my comments.
But if we do end up seeing further delays to the 787 deliveries I would expect BA to see some further compo from Boeing in respect of the delays, I wouldnt be surprised to see the 7 x 763s that are scheduled not to have the spruce up actually end up getting it and as such staying in the fleet for longer than we were expecting.
Just my thoughts being thrown out there
cs
#28
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Edinburgh UK
Programs: BA Silver, HHonours Gold, Mucci of Pucci, Oyster Card, Nectar Card, Father's Day Card
Posts: 9,372
#29
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges and Environmentally Friendly Travel
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 22,212