Noise cancelling headphones in CW and F
#17
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 10,159
From Trusted Reviews.com
"The same says it all. The Bose QuietComfort 15 are extremely comfortable and boast the best noise cancellation in the business. We've tried the rest and have had to conclude the Bose are the best. As a headphone for busy tube trains or airplanes, they're unparalleled. You do pay a lot for the clever tech inside, though, and if you don't care too much about cancellation you can get better sound at the same price."
However I like these ones which double up as an eye mask.
"The same says it all. The Bose QuietComfort 15 are extremely comfortable and boast the best noise cancellation in the business. We've tried the rest and have had to conclude the Bose are the best. As a headphone for busy tube trains or airplanes, they're unparalleled. You do pay a lot for the clever tech inside, though, and if you don't care too much about cancellation you can get better sound at the same price."
However I like these ones which double up as an eye mask.
#18
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,095
#19
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London
Programs: Le Creuset 26cm square grillit club, laithwaites red club
Posts: 530
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A405 Safari/8536.25)
I feel left out, I have QC3s. How do these compare to 15s?
I feel left out, I have QC3s. How do these compare to 15s?
#21
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: BA - Blue > Bronze > Silver > Bronze > Blue
Posts: 6,812
Im not a sound whore by any means though and can quite easily sleep with Metallica playing 50 meters away!
#22
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern Med
Programs: BAEC Silver, Flying Blue Gold, Gulf Air Silver, Aegean Gold, M&M FQTV, Air Malta Diamond
Posts: 1,741
I use QC15s.
The BA ones are symptomatic of BA, offer something that sounds good and then deliver it half heartedly.
The BA ones are symptomatic of BA, offer something that sounds good and then deliver it half heartedly.
#24
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: BA Gold, AA Lifetime Gold 1.8mm, IC Spire Ambassador, Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold et al
Posts: 4,350
I'm another Bose fan following an AA flight many years ago but I've switched to a good pair of in-ear 'phones simply because I find the Bose case takes up too much room in my bag when I'm trying to travel without checked luggage.
I can carry my current pair in my pocket.
I can carry my current pair in my pocket.
#25
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bicester, UK
Programs: MUCCI, BAEC Silver, A-Club Gold
Posts: 1,228
The 3's also feel a little more solid/denser. Maybe they are metal, the 15's are plastic.
The daft thing that I also like is the "power on" led is green on the 15's as opposed to red on the 3's. The green is more me!
#26
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Programs: Mucci, BAEC (Silver), FlyBe
Posts: 1,649
If the in-flight headphones were that good, few would make it back to base for a second flight...
I'd like to put in a vote for my Sony MDR-NC22s. In-ear, take up virtually no space in the bag, excellent noise cancellation, have been battered around the world and are a replaceable £50. I don't doubt that Bose offer better sound quality, but definitely worse value.
I'd like to put in a vote for my Sony MDR-NC22s. In-ear, take up virtually no space in the bag, excellent noise cancellation, have been battered around the world and are a replaceable £50. I don't doubt that Bose offer better sound quality, but definitely worse value.
#27
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern Med
Programs: BAEC Silver, Flying Blue Gold, Gulf Air Silver, Aegean Gold, M&M FQTV, Air Malta Diamond
Posts: 1,741
If the in-flight headphones were that good, few would make it back to base for a second flight...
I'd like to put in a vote for my Sony MDR-NC22s. In-ear, take up virtually no space in the bag, excellent noise cancellation, have been battered around the world and are a replaceable £50. I don't doubt that Bose offer better sound quality, but definitely worse value.
I'd like to put in a vote for my Sony MDR-NC22s. In-ear, take up virtually no space in the bag, excellent noise cancellation, have been battered around the world and are a replaceable £50. I don't doubt that Bose offer better sound quality, but definitely worse value.
As windonwontheaside says, they are only effective against repetitive noise, so people talking etc still comes through.
#28
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,513
Well, when you've tried a true pair of custom moulded ear plugs then you'll realise that the Bose headphones don't really make that much of a difference... but for completeness I like to wear my Bose QC-2s (old school) and the earplugs!
Sorry to be the predictable in-ear disciple!
#29
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK. BAEC AAdvantage
Programs: Mucci Des Oeufs Brouilles et des Canards
Posts: 3,671
I bought some Etymotics and had custom earpieces made for them. I have to say, having been a rabid QC15 fan, I'm now a total convert. Not cheap, but less than the QCs I guess. But much more compact in your hand luggage and the noise reduction is much greater than the QCs.
Sorry to be the predictable in-ear disciple!
Sorry to be the predictable in-ear disciple!
But, like mentioned above, there is the wax issue which I am a suffer of. I'm also worried about long term effects of having a speaker that close to your eardrum. Maybe there's nothing different, but given how often I see, nay, hear people with white in-ear headphones listening so loudly to them, I wish I had the cash to invest in a hearing aid company!! There's future potentional there!!
#30
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,513
I too suffer from the wax issue. When the moulds were taken the audiologist dealt with the wax first and then took the moulds. I had never had the wax cleared before and didn't realise how much it was affecting my hearing. From now on its an annual check up, which I will get done at Boots along with my eyes at the same time. The earphones should not be affected by any build up in between check ups I am assured.
I'm not qualified to speak to the issue of having something so close to your ear drum. However I take some comfort, potentially unwisely, that they were fitted by an expert audiologist. I assume they would not fit a product which had a high potential to damage your hearing. I am sure the standard warnings about not playing them at deafening levels still apply.
The process from booking an appointment at your audiologist (often Boots in the UK) and receiving the earbuds back is upto 4 weeks, although it was only about 2 weeks for me. The company that actually makes them is ACS as mentioned in the link above. If you buy Etymotics (not all models probably) you get a discount voucher for the earbuds.
I warn you, the process of having the moulds of your ears taken is like having a large wet fish inserted into your ears! Not necessarily unpleasant, but you'd have to be pretty kinky to enjoy it.
I'm not qualified to speak to the issue of having something so close to your ear drum. However I take some comfort, potentially unwisely, that they were fitted by an expert audiologist. I assume they would not fit a product which had a high potential to damage your hearing. I am sure the standard warnings about not playing them at deafening levels still apply.
The process from booking an appointment at your audiologist (often Boots in the UK) and receiving the earbuds back is upto 4 weeks, although it was only about 2 weeks for me. The company that actually makes them is ACS as mentioned in the link above. If you buy Etymotics (not all models probably) you get a discount voucher for the earbuds.
I warn you, the process of having the moulds of your ears taken is like having a large wet fish inserted into your ears! Not necessarily unpleasant, but you'd have to be pretty kinky to enjoy it.