Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Celebs not in the CCR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2011, 12:29 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,172
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
Both of them are full of it aren't they
Having beaten David M from BA217 in CW onto the People Eater, and then to IAD Immigration, and later tried to engage him in conversation at Customs, I couldn't comment.
He was clearly not interested in talking to a fellow Brit.

Perhaps he knew about Ed meeting the Bear?
T8191 is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2011, 2:23 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 2,422
Originally Posted by stewaran
a friend of mine works at northolt, and they have lots of private flights in and out of there, so much so that they are apparently the only RAF base that actually turns a profit.

so i guess the mega rich prefer that, i guess it works quite well for security too
Lots of private traffic out of LCY too. Not sure which one "celebs" would prefer to depart from.

Footnote: I've just noticed that LCY Jet Centre operates Northolt too http://www.londoncityairport.com/Pla...JetCentre.aspx
Steve_ZA is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2011, 2:30 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Programs: Mucci Petit Four de Pucci, RedVee's Navigator Badge, BA Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,124
Originally Posted by T8191
Having beaten David M from BA217 in CW onto the People Eater, and then to IAD Immigration, and later tried to engage him in conversation at Customs, I couldn't comment.
He was clearly not interested in talking to a fellow Brit.

Perhaps he knew about Ed meeting the Bear?
Maybe he did - liked the pic! Rather sweet.

Was your (unsatisfactory) meeting with Mr David M when he was foreign sec on an official jaunt? If so, did he get an official welcome party like G Osborne did when I travelled on the UD with him to IAD in April? (He still had to do US immigration in the normal way though).
Fruitcake is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2011, 3:46 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: Seniors Bus Pass
Posts: 5,531
Originally Posted by T8191
.... noted that my colon was a classic example of how it should be used. ....
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
Both of them are full of it aren't they
... Accumulating used material in the lower colon, I presume? I think I can spot a simile here.

This grammar stuff is far too hard/difficult for a simple soul like me
antichef is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2011, 8:32 pm
  #35  
Gaz
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold, UA Gold
Posts: 2,022
Originally Posted by LeisureFirst
Ah yes, that reminds me that two weeks ago I did try out a trick suggested on here. Boarding a 747 to JFK on a cloudy morning shortly before pushback, I put on a big pair of dark Prada sunglasses on the jetway. I did indeed get shown to my seat (2A). The previous hit rate on my five or six F trips on BA has definitely been below 50%. So not statisically significant on its own, but interesting and in accordance with the FT prediction (can't remember now who made it) that the dark glasses would create enough of an aura of mystery in that split-second when they decide if they can spare a cabin crew member to escort one to one's seat.
Definitely makes a difference. I'm often wearing my big designer shades on boarding, which is rather idiotic, but I spend far too much time in airports hungover / sleep deprived, and prefer to keep my tired eyes hidden from fellow passengers who haven't been awake for the last 24 hours.

Anyway, as well as an 100% success rate in BA F escorting, I've also found you're never, ever questioned when striding down the business class fast-track security lane or boarding lane.

BA (and LHR in general) aren't too discriminatory - they'll check your boarding card to see if you're in the right lane. But at lots of other airports around the world, if you're young looking, not dressed in a suit, and are flying around in J/F you'll hear the phrase "Flying business today sir?" rather more than you'd like. Throw on some shades and you'll virtually never hear it. Strange but true.
Gaz is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 2:01 am
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,172
Originally Posted by Fruitcake
Maybe he did - liked the pic! Rather sweet.

Was your (unsatisfactory) meeting with Mr David M when he was foreign sec on an official jaunt? If so, did he get an official welcome party like G Osborne did when I travelled on the UD with him to IAD in April? (He still had to do US immigration in the normal way though).
No, he was out of power and out of favour ... travelling solo and not greeted by onyone. Just another lonely traveller on those railway lines in the sky
T8191 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 9:48 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,066
Originally Posted by LeisureFirst
Languages do evolve but that doesn't turn every commonplace mistake into progress. Misuse of the language often amount to the bluntening of a sharp scalpel, making it harder to express
Bluntening??? Good to see English evolving in real time on this website.
muscat is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 3:28 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Programs: Mucci Petit Four de Pucci, RedVee's Navigator Badge, BA Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,124
Originally Posted by T8191
No, he was out of power and out of favour ... travelling solo and not greeted by onyone. Just another lonely traveller on those railway lines in the sky
A fetching tale - it was typically good of you to try to be kind to him T8191.
Fruitcake is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 5:58 pm
  #39  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by LeisureFirst
Ah yes, that reminds me that two weeks ago I did try out a trick suggested on here. Boarding a 747 to JFK on a cloudy morning shortly before pushback, I put on a big pair of dark Prada sunglasses on the jetway. I did indeed get shown to my seat (2A). The previous hit rate on my five or six F trips on BA has definitely been below 50%. So not statisically significant on its own, but interesting and in accordance with the FT prediction (can't remember now who made it) that the dark glasses would create enough of an aura of mystery in that split-second when they decide if they can spare a cabin crew member to escort one to one's seat.
I thought F pax were always escorted to their seat? Perhaps because I'm in my 20's, generally scruffy and wearing a leather jacket and jeans they assume I am important? Haha.
GetSetJetSet is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2011, 11:47 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,513
Originally Posted by LeisureFirst
making it harder to express precise ideas and distinctions.
I'm not sure that "10 items or less" is really all that susceptible to misunderstanding as a result of the very minor error in grammar. And I am sure we all knew what the OP was getting at when he/she said:
Originally Posted by lancefan
are we seeing less celebs in the CCR.
So in those circumstances is it necessary to belittle the OP, even though I am sure it was meant in jest? It does seem to be a regular theme on this board to pick holes in people's posts just for the hell of it, rather than debating the content and assertions. I'm not totally convinced this encourages a warm, friendly and open atmosphere.

Last edited by ColdWalker; Nov 10, 2011 at 11:51 pm Reason: To correct my errors in grammar!
ColdWalker is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2011, 1:31 am
  #41  
Suspended
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,959
Originally Posted by GetSetJetSet
I thought F pax were always escorted to their seat? Perhaps because I'm in my 20's, generally scruffy and wearing a leather jacket and jeans they assume I am important? Haha.
In my limited experience of flying F, I have a 100% hit-rate for being shown to my seat on ex. LHR flights and a 0% hit-rate on flights ex. Outstation.

To be honest I really appreciate being shown to my seat; the very personalised "Welcome on board" that you get from the CSD and then your F crew makes you feel very welcome and the helps the pre-flight service run much more smoothly.
FlyerTalker6245 is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2011, 1:52 am
  #42  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,085
Originally Posted by ColdWalker
I'm not sure that "10 items or less" is really all that susceptible to misunderstanding as a result of the very minor error in grammar.
You're right: getting upset about solecisms committed by a supermarket is absurd.
IAN-UK is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2011, 2:43 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salisbury Plain
Programs: BA: Silver,
Posts: 1,197
Originally Posted by Betteronacamel
Couldn't agree more. Tesco are still x items or less but Waitrose have progressed to x items or fewer ^

Latest bugbear - use of the word 'hard' as opposed to 'difficult'. Everything is so hard these days...
I couldn't like agree with you more!
onaswan is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2011, 2:54 am
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,172
Originally Posted by onaswan
I couldn't like agree with you more!
That statement is an invitation for further linguistic analysis, but in the interest of FT harmony I shall resist temptation
T8191 is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2011, 5:17 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London WC2/W1
Programs: BAEC Silver; Muccis du Monde des Peluches
Posts: 6,627
Originally Posted by muscat
Bluntening??? Good to see English evolving in real time on this website.
Thank you. "Blunting" isn't a word I heard often, but would be correct.
LeisureFirst is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.