Community
Wiki Posts
Search

MFU then downgraded

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2011, 5:58 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: BA GGL; SPG Plat; HH Diamond
Posts: 439
MFU then downgraded

Hi everyone,

I MFU from Club to First and then there was an aircraft change (no First) and i was downgraded to Club.

How will this work? Will i be offered the same as a paying First passenger or will i just be offered miles back or nothing at all?

Has this happened to anyone in the past?
arir is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 7:00 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oxon, UK
Programs: Mucci des canapes, Skywards Gold, BAEC, IC Plat Amb, LH FTV
Posts: 1,957
You should get the miles you used to MFU back with no problem - if not then phone BAEC. They may not give you anything else as they may take the view that in the end you received what you had originally paid for.
pomkiwi is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 7:37 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,123
Don't believe the can get away with just refunding miles - supposed to be a percentage of what you paid, which should be your cash fare plus the miles used. Might not stop that approach being tried of course... (or you may prefer the 100% miles refund of course, so you could argue for that if you wanted).
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 7:52 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, EI Silver, HH Gold, BW Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,271
Unless your flight was entirely outside the EU (SIN-SYD, for example), you ought to be given back 50% or 75% of what you paid for the flight (the CW fare plus the miles, separately), depending on whether the flight was under or over 3,500km. I don't see why an MFU downgrade would be treated differently than any other invol downgrade.

I suspect BA's first offer will be to refund all the MFU miles, perhaps plus a little more; it'll be for you to decide whether that is acceptable or whether to make a counteroffer.
stifle is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 8:25 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MUCCI
Posts: 1,937
As others have said it is 50% or 75% of the fare depending on the length of the sector.

I suspect that they will try just to give you the miles back but you are entitled to the above.

FD.
Flying Doctor is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 8:54 am
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,287
Can it be classed as a downgrade in the usual sense of the word when no F cabin was operating I wonder? They could have just cancelled your ticket, given a refund then issued a new one in CW to get round that rule....if it applies. I expect you to be offered the difference in miles between F and CW.

Do let us know how you get on.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 9:06 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OSL
Programs: BAEC Bronze, M&M FTL, TK *G HHonors Gold
Posts: 878
Not that this applies to me, but i'm just curious if I've understood this correctly:

I I book, let's say a CW ticket between LHR and JFK, and MFU myself both ways. Let's say I pay 20.000 NOK for the ticket, and the CW-to-F milage (don't know, to be honest)

Would i then get back 50%/75% of the 20K NOK and all of the miles, or is it 50%/75% of both the money and the miles?

I would have been more than happy enough with getting my miles back, to be honest, and no money. I would still travel in CW, and thatwould have been what i had paid for.
martinfoss is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 9:18 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Programs: BA Blue, IC Spire Ambassador
Posts: 5,243
Originally Posted by martinfoss
Not that this applies to me, but i'm just curious if I've understood this correctly:

I I book, let's say a CW ticket between LHR and JFK, and MFU myself both ways. Let's say I pay 20.000 NOK for the ticket, and the CW-to-F milage (don't know, to be honest)

Would i then get back 50%/75% of the 20K NOK and all of the miles, or is it 50%/75% of both the money and the miles?

I would have been more than happy enough with getting my miles back, to be honest, and no money. I would still travel in CW, and thatwould have been what i had paid for.

See Art. 10 Reg. 261/2004 E.C.

A downgrade is a downgrade. Your ticket price comprises of your cash CW fare and your MFU. You should get the appropriate downgrade compensation, on a strict construction. Quite how BA is to pay your miles in accordance with Art. 7 (3), i dont know. IMHO it's very poorly drafted.

Last edited by IAMORGAN; Jul 26, 2011 at 9:24 am
IAMORGAN is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 9:39 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Programs: TfL Oyster Gold
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by HIDDY
They could have just cancelled your ticket, given a refund then issued a new one in CW to get round that rule....
A refund is at the passenger's choice, not the air carriers. The air carrier would be required to pay compensation AND provide alternative transportation "under comparable transport conditions"

Rgulation (EC) 261/2004

"Article 5
Cancellation
1. In case of cancellation of a flight, the passengers
concerned shall:
(a) be offered assistance by the operating air carrier in accordance
with Article 8; and
(b) be offered assistance by the operating air carrier in accordance
with Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2),.. and
(c) have the right to compensation by the operating air carrier
in accordance with Article 7, unless [adeqate notice is provided]:

Article 8
Right to reimbursement or re-routing
1. Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall
be offered the choice between:
(a) reimbursement within seven days, by the means
provided for in Article 7(3), of the full cost of the ticket
at the price at which it was bought, for the part or
parts of the journey not made, and for the part or parts
already made if the flight is no longer serving any
purpose in relation to the passenger's original travel
plan, together with, when relevant,
a return flight to the first point of departure, at the
earliest opportunity;
(b) re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to their
final destination at the earliest opportunity; or
(c) re-routing, under comparable transport conditions, to their
final destination at a later date at the passenger's convenience,
subject to availability of seats.

1. Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall
receive compensation amounting to:
(a) EUR 250 for all flights of 1 500 kilometres or less;
(b) EUR 400 for all intra-Community flights of more than
1 500 kilometres, and for all other flights between 1 500
and 3 500 kilometres;
(c) EUR 600 for all flights not falling under (a) or (b)
."
ManAtTheBack is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 9:50 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Programs: BA, IHG, 5C
Posts: 4,413
Be careful what you wish for.

Personally I think this is unfortunate but I think a refund of the miles (and perhaps an offer to cancel and refund the whole ticket) is perfectly reasonable. Or perhaps a move to the next flight with F (in line with the EU cancellation rules ... no compensation is due if this is 2 weeks out).

If the OP insists on a 75% refund per the EU rules then BA might decide to put him in Y!
pauldb is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2011, 11:07 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London WC2/W1
Programs: BAEC Silver; Muccis du Monde des Peluches
Posts: 6,627
Originally Posted by pauldb
Personally I think this is unfortunate but I think a refund of the miles (and perhaps an offer to cancel and refund the whole ticket) is perfectly reasonable.
I don't think it is at all reasonable. The situation is a bit more obvious, I think, with an MFU from WTP to CW, but the principle is the same.

Suppose I pay 800 plus 25,000 miles for a CW return to New York (as I quite often do, give or take 100). Then I have a contract with BA for exactly that, and I consider that I've paid a fair price for a service I want, otherwise I wouldn't have bought the ticket.

It does not follow that I would have been willing to pay 800 for a WTP return to New York. I most certainly wouldn't. I don't think it's worth it, and I don't do Y (or premium Y) long-haul. Even if the ticket were free I probably wouldn't take the flight. That is my decision and however much BA can sell a WTP seat for is irrelevant. BA can't just change the terms of the contract, give me back 25k miles, and tell me that I've happily bought a WTP return from them for 800 - something I would never choose to do.

Similarly, suppose I pay 800 for a nice 46" LED Television and then, when it comes to delivery time, the shop discovers it's oversold them. So it decides to deliver a 30" television worth (in its mind) 350 instead and refund me 450. Can it do this? No it can't, because I don't want a 30" television, I want a 46" one. The argument that 'the 30" television will get you from A to B, which is primarily what you paid for' just won't wash.


If the OP insists on a 75% refund per the EU rules then BA might decide to put him in Y!
As I read it, the OP has already taken the flight. If not, he might be well-advised to do so before claiming compensation. And if BA have changed the flight and given him reasonable notice, then I don't think he can expect much compensation at all - the 75% refund rule wouldn't apply.
LeisureFirst is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2011, 1:05 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Programs: BA, IHG, 5C
Posts: 4,413
Originally Posted by LeisureFirst
As I read it, the OP has already taken the flight. If not, he might be well-advised to do so before claiming compensation. And if BA have changed the flight and given him reasonable notice, then I don't think he can expect much compensation at all - the 75% refund rule wouldn't apply.
OK I think you're probably right that the flight has occurred, which does mean the OP's options were restricted and BA should be more generous, or more penalised if that's how you look at it. But in general...

Originally Posted by LeisureFirst
Suppose I pay 800 plus 25,000 miles for a CW return to New York (as I quite often do, give or take 100). Then I have a contract with BA for exactly that, and I consider that I've paid a fair price for a service I want, otherwise I wouldn't have bought the ticket.

It does not follow that I would have been willing to pay 800 for a WTP return to New York. I most certainly wouldn't. I don't think it's worth it, and I don't do Y (or premium Y) long-haul. Even if the ticket were free I probably wouldn't take the flight. That is my decision and however much BA can sell a WTP seat for is irrelevant. BA can't just change the terms of the contract, give me back 25k miles, and tell me that I've happily bought a WTP return from them for 800 - something I would never choose to do.

Similarly, suppose I pay 800 for a nice 46" LED Television and then, when it comes to delivery time, the shop discovers it's oversold them. So it decides to deliver a 30" television worth (in its mind) 350 instead and refund me 450. Can it do this? No it can't, because I don't want a 30" television, I want a 46" one. The argument that 'the 30" television will get you from A to B, which is primarily what you paid for' just won't wash.
For some MFUs you do initially book the WT+ for the price advertised, and then upgrade it. So you were willing to pay for 800 WT+ with a little uncertainty whether you'd be able to upgrade. Even upfront MFUs are technically "Book with cash, upgrade with miles" which might get lawyers arguing if you say you never bought the cash ticket.

How about you bought a 40" TV for 700 but before it arrived a 46" was on sale at 800 so you paid 100 extra. But they couldn't fulfil the order. Should they give you the 40" TV and a 600 refund (75% of 800)?
pauldb is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2011, 1:43 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, EI Silver, HH Gold, BW Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,271
I've never tried it, but I thought when you MFU-ed at booking time you never actually had a WTP seat, just a CW one.
stifle is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2011, 2:46 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MUCCI
Posts: 1,937
I am not sure that I agree that you bought WT+ and then upgraded. I would not view it like that - I wanted to travel in J and I used a combination of methods of payment for this. If the upgrade had not gone through then I would cancel the ticket - which you are entitled to do irrespective of the restrictions on it as they do not come into force for the initial 24 hours after purchase. It is therefore an involuntary downgrade - there is a contract both ways - and I would be looking to be compensated as per the regulations. I would not accept just a refund of the miles - I have plenty of them and this would be pretty irrelevant for me.

FD.
Flying Doctor is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2011, 3:30 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ORD
Programs: BA, AA, SQ, UA, AC, WS, MR TIT
Posts: 8,680
Originally Posted by arir
I MFU from Club to First and then there was an aircraft change (no First) and i was downgraded to Club.
On which route that incident occurred ?
NA-Flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.