why Best Western not talked about as much
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 22
why Best Western not talked about as much
as like Marriott?
both of them have over 4000 properties. for sure best western credit is not as good as Marrriot's.
it's also because Best Western has not as much brand as Marrriott?
or Best Western loyalty program not as good as Marriott?
both of them have over 4000 properties. for sure best western credit is not as good as Marrriot's.
it's also because Best Western has not as much brand as Marrriott?
or Best Western loyalty program not as good as Marriott?
#2
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
Look at how little Choice properties are talked about and they also have a ton of hotels. However, BWs are usually lower to mid-tier properties that don't really appeal to the FT demographic. There aren't amazing aspirational properties to redeem points at. Furthermore, a lot of FT travel is business travel, if you were traveling for business, would you rather be at at BW or a Marriott?
Oh and being an elite with BW is also pretty worthless.
Oh and being an elite with BW is also pretty worthless.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2009
Location: FRA / YEG
Programs: AC Super Elite, Radisson Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 11,874
+1
While I'm sure there are many business travellers who regularly stay at low-end / mid-tier properties, FT generally attracts travellers who stay at upper mid-level to high-end properties. And if they stay at lower end properties they prefer chains with a decent loyalty program.
Since BW doesn't have (m)any exciting properties and has one of the mos tmoedicre loalty programs in the industry, it should be no surprise not many people discuss BW.
While I'm sure there are many business travellers who regularly stay at low-end / mid-tier properties, FT generally attracts travellers who stay at upper mid-level to high-end properties. And if they stay at lower end properties they prefer chains with a decent loyalty program.
Since BW doesn't have (m)any exciting properties and has one of the mos tmoedicre loalty programs in the industry, it should be no surprise not many people discuss BW.
#4
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Minneapolis, originally from Cincinnati
Programs: Diamond with Delta, Hyatt and Hilton. 2 MM and Plat with America (thank you citi:))
Posts: 2,345
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 22
stay in best western more because Marriott does not have property in many places I visit, while best western have.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
But Marriott has about a dozen brands, while Best Western has 1 to 3, depending on how you count them (many people count them as just 1). There's a lot of differences between those various brands, and lot of the discussion is about those differences.
Marriott has status levels that people care about, and discuss a lot. BW has status levels that mean close to nothing, so it doesn't much constant discussion.
Because Marriott has an active lifetime status program, so people discuss that. BW doesn't seem to (it had it only as a promotion once, I think). Anyway, since the status itself means fairly little at BW, a lifetime version of the same status means a lifetime of fairly little.
But basically, compared to the so-called "majors", there's fairly little discussion of any of the budget hotel programs: Best Western or Choice or WynhdamRewards. (And you should be happy that the Best Western forum doesn't have the threads that the WyndhamRewards forum has! )
Marriott has status levels that people care about, and discuss a lot. BW has status levels that mean close to nothing, so it doesn't much constant discussion.
Because Marriott has an active lifetime status program, so people discuss that. BW doesn't seem to (it had it only as a promotion once, I think). Anyway, since the status itself means fairly little at BW, a lifetime version of the same status means a lifetime of fairly little.
But basically, compared to the so-called "majors", there's fairly little discussion of any of the budget hotel programs: Best Western or Choice or WynhdamRewards. (And you should be happy that the Best Western forum doesn't have the threads that the WyndhamRewards forum has! )
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,690
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
A. Because it's already attractive enough to most people, compared to their competition (which is other programs in the "budget" space like Choice, WyndhamRewards, etc). Best Western does not consider the "higher end" programs like Hilton HHonors, IHG Club, Marriott Rewards, SPG, etc to be their competition!
B. Because how it works is presumably working reasonably well for them? (I don't see most of their hotels going empty, nor do I see their rates going down!)
C. Because they prefer to make changes incrementally rather than drastic overhaul. In case you're new, you may not be aware they have made little improvements to make the program more attractive than it was, say, a few years ago. A few years ago they didn't have the brand divided into three tiers (BW basic, BW Plus, and BW Premier). A few years ago they didn't have the welcome amenity for those with elite status. Not the biggest changes, but they came one at a time, and they each made the program slightly more attractive than it was before. Perhaps they've got some more things on the horizon, but I presume they'll be small and one at a time, if there are any more.
D.. Because at Best Western every hotel is "independently owned and operated" (even though the "higher end" programs may not own most of their hotels, most of their hotels are owned and/or operated by multi-hotel management groups). Thus it's more work for the program to communicate to all its member hotels than at other programs (where own owner may handle many hotels within the program).
B. Because how it works is presumably working reasonably well for them? (I don't see most of their hotels going empty, nor do I see their rates going down!)
C. Because they prefer to make changes incrementally rather than drastic overhaul. In case you're new, you may not be aware they have made little improvements to make the program more attractive than it was, say, a few years ago. A few years ago they didn't have the brand divided into three tiers (BW basic, BW Plus, and BW Premier). A few years ago they didn't have the welcome amenity for those with elite status. Not the biggest changes, but they came one at a time, and they each made the program slightly more attractive than it was before. Perhaps they've got some more things on the horizon, but I presume they'll be small and one at a time, if there are any more.
D.. Because at Best Western every hotel is "independently owned and operated" (even though the "higher end" programs may not own most of their hotels, most of their hotels are owned and/or operated by multi-hotel management groups). Thus it's more work for the program to communicate to all its member hotels than at other programs (where own owner may handle many hotels within the program).
#10
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 429
#11
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Minneapolis, originally from Cincinnati
Programs: Diamond with Delta, Hyatt and Hilton. 2 MM and Plat with America (thank you citi:))
Posts: 2,345
Not sure if this is still the case, but the best western presidential in NYC Times Square use to charge for internet. IIRC, the primrose in Toronto did as well. It's been a while since I have stayed at a BW, so if I am remembering wrong, feel free to correct me and I apologize in advance
#12
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy, Aeroplan, Best Western, IHG Rewards, AAdvantage, Executive Club
Posts: 166
I'm a fan of Best Western. Especially since their points never expire. It's probably because they do not have too many luxurious properties.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Singapore
Programs: IHG Plat Amb, Accor Plat, Hilton HHonors Gold, Best Western Diamond, Club Carlson Gold, GHA Black
Posts: 278
maybe service standards. I recently got a status match as a BW Diamond. I stayed at the Best Western Premier @ Kuala Lumpur.
1. I was not greeted as a Diamond Member
2. I was not give any diamond amenities (welcome drink or voucher or whatsoever)
3. I booked a 2 bedroom suite and was given a 1 bedroom suite, was left waiting in the room after calling the front office (they promised they will settle) I made my way to the lobby and the front office staff only started processing my queries. No apologies nothing and a new set of key card was given. as there were 4 of us, i requested for 4 cards, but only given 3.
4. Breakfast spread was disappointing, only 1 dish with chicken. Rest were carbohydrates and processed meat.
5. Concierge was non-existence.
6. (Maybe im unreasonable here) I had to pay for parking at the hotel.
1. I was not greeted as a Diamond Member
2. I was not give any diamond amenities (welcome drink or voucher or whatsoever)
3. I booked a 2 bedroom suite and was given a 1 bedroom suite, was left waiting in the room after calling the front office (they promised they will settle) I made my way to the lobby and the front office staff only started processing my queries. No apologies nothing and a new set of key card was given. as there were 4 of us, i requested for 4 cards, but only given 3.
4. Breakfast spread was disappointing, only 1 dish with chicken. Rest were carbohydrates and processed meat.
5. Concierge was non-existence.
6. (Maybe im unreasonable here) I had to pay for parking at the hotel.
#14
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: berkeley, Ca, USA
Programs: Hyatt globalist, Alaska mvp gold, Marriott platinum, ihg diamond
Posts: 438
BW are convenient since you can find them in remote areas, but the diamond status is a joke. I am rarely offered any check-in amenity and never an upgrade. I had a reservation at the San Simeon BW using a paid night in an oceanview and the next night using an award. They insisted on moving us the second day into a parking lot view room claiming they never upgraded even if you're diamond. The service is inconsistent, some are better than others but they are typically 2 star motels.
#15
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Minneapolis, originally from Cincinnati
Programs: Diamond with Delta, Hyatt and Hilton. 2 MM and Plat with America (thank you citi:))
Posts: 2,345
BW are convenient since you can find them in remote areas, but the diamond status is a joke. I am rarely offered any check-in amenity and never an upgrade. I had a reservation at the San Simeon BW using a paid night in an oceanview and the next night using an award. They insisted on moving us the second day into a parking lot view room claiming they never upgraded even if you're diamond. The service is inconsistent, some are better than others but they are typically 2 star motels.
At least BW diamond is easy to achieve. I just email or fax my Hilton or Hyatt diamond card over every year and get status matched.