Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Mid-air close call between AA 321 and TJ PJ2 on JFK approach on 10 Nov 2023

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Mid-air close call between AA 321 and TJ PJ2 on JFK approach on 10 Nov 2023

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2023, 7:14 pm
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,515
Mid-air close call between AA 321 and TJ PJ2 on JFK approach on 10 Nov 2023

AA28 (LAX-JFK) N109NN and TJ235 (HPN-JFK) N235RB

I know a lot of factors go into each incident, and they are all unique, but sadly, these near misses are getting more and more common nowadays. It's painfully clear whatever the issue(s) is(are), we need to address them soon before a deadly tragedy.

Repooc17 is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2023, 7:04 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: CP-ASEL,AMEL,G-IA in Tucson, Arizona, United States
Posts: 1,124
Incidentally, the localizer frequencies are sufficiently dissimilar: 110.9 vs. 109.5. I can see how the PC-12 crew might've selected the wrong approach (ever scroll to and accidentally select a menu option next to the option you actually wanted?) and then failed to cross-reference the approach plates to verify the frequency.
tlglenn is offline  
Old Nov 28, 2023, 7:06 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: JFK/LGA
Programs: AA EXP/5 MM, BA Blue Bayou, HH LT Diamond
Posts: 5,828
I just wanted to know who flies from HPN to JFK
Antarius likes this.
pauleeepaul is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 6:47 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: CMH, CLE, CAK
Programs: AA, Hertz, Hyatt, Hilton
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by pauleeepaul
I just wanted to know who flies from HPN to JFK
Same here. Even on a bad day, that's what - a 1 hour drive? Slightly more? Although, didn't United offer HPN-EWR in the past? (Granted that's a bit further, but still...)

Maybe it was just a repositioning flight?
Hoi polloi is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 8:06 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rolling Lakes Yacht Club
Posts: 4,988
This happens more often that gets attention.

It's happened to me personally. At a class D airport, I was cleared to land on a lengthy final. There was a student with their CFI, they were on the downwind leg. Controller advised they were #2, following me, and call their base. They read back. I didn't think much of them, as they must still be on the downwind leg and there was no call for their base leg. They wound up cutting me off. The degree of separation was so little I could clearly see the instructor mouthing "OH @&^." I had to take evasive maneuvers. They then sheepishly called they were base turning final. The controller asked where I was, and the student didnt do as instructed.

I had a lengthy, heated, profanity laden conversation with that CFI once on the ground. I also called the FSDO.

Props to the AA crew for keeping cool and being situationally aware.
Antarius, fdog and jerseytom like this.

Last edited by DataPlumber; Nov 29, 2023 at 8:19 am
DataPlumber is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 9:55 am
  #6  
Used to be 'g_leyser'
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brandon Johnson International Airport (expect delays)
Programs: AA PlatPro, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold, IHG Plat, Reno Air MEGA Platinum
Posts: 10,039
This is the other airline involved, for those who are interested: https://www.flytradewind.com/fleet/
aisleorwindow is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 10:15 am
  #7  
Moderator: American AAdvantage, Signatures
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, England
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador, National Exec, AA EXP Emeritus
Posts: 9,765
I've updated this thread's title to more accurately reflect its contents.

~Moderator
Microwave is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 4:55 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NYC
Programs: AA, Marriott
Posts: 210
Glad nothing worse happened to the crew and pax, but also selfishly glad this didn't damage another A321T given AA isn't repairing them anymore.
A321T is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 8:12 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wanting First. Buying First.
Programs: Lifetime Executive Diamond Platinum VIP with Braniff, Eastern, Midway, National & Pan Am
Posts: 17,492
Originally Posted by Repooc17
AA28 (LAX-JFK) N109NN and TJ235 (HPN-JFK) N235RB

I know a lot of factors go into each incident, and they are all unique, but sadly, these near misses are getting more and more common nowadays. It's painfully clear whatever the issue(s) is(are), we need to address them soon before a deadly tragedy.
This was not a particularly "close call" and it was not even a loss of separation.

The Pilatus was VFR. AA was, obviously, IFR. While it was some very strange vectoring by the N90 controller, at no point was the required 500' vertical separation lost.
Herb687 is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 9:14 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: LA
Programs: AA, DL, UA
Posts: 543
Originally Posted by Herb687
This was not a particularly "close call" and it was not even a loss of separation.

The Pilatus was VFR. AA was, obviously, IFR. While it was some very strange vectoring by the N90 controller, at no point was the required 500' vertical separation lost.
Someone commenting on the Youtube video claims to be the pilot, and said the TCAS was giving an advisory of 200 feet.
supermintyfresh is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 9:23 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wanting First. Buying First.
Programs: Lifetime Executive Diamond Platinum VIP with Braniff, Eastern, Midway, National & Pan Am
Posts: 17,492
Originally Posted by supermintyfresh
Someone commenting on the Youtube video claims to be the pilot, and said the TCAS was giving an advisory of 200 feet.
I know that the altitude readouts gathered by sites like flightaware and flightradar24 are not authoritative but if you look at the Youtube video, GPD235 never descended below their last assigned altitude of 2500'. While it appears they intercepted the wrong localizer, they did not start the approach and descend from the last assigned 2500' that was legal separation from an IFR target at 2000'.

Also if AA was following a TCAS RA, their Mode S enhanced transponder would might alert on the N90 controller's scope. (Edited to add: Maybe. I need to brush up on this. I get confused with what change 7.1 does vs. Enhanced Flight ID. I'm pretty sure that while aircraft with the latest implementation of TCAS II (7.1) and Mode S/Enhanced Flight ID are able to annunciate TCAS RAs to ATC, not all ATC is able to receive that annunciation?)

(Edited to edit to add: the guiding principle here being that ATC should not give a contrary instruction to an aircraft following a TCAS RA)

The vectoring of GPD235 right over AA on final for the parallel was certainly a curious move by the N90 controller working final but nothing indicates legal VFR from IFR separation was ever lost.
supermintyfresh likes this.

Last edited by Herb687; Nov 29, 2023 at 9:35 pm Reason: discursus on TCAS RA visibility to ATC
Herb687 is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2023, 9:57 pm
  #12  
PHL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,072
Originally Posted by A321T
Glad nothing worse happened to the crew and pax, but also selfishly glad this didn't damage another A321T given AA isn't repairing them anymore.
If an A321, or any airliner for that matter, was damaged in a mid-air fender bender, there would be little of the aircraft left to repair. Aside from that, I'm not sure what you mean by AA not repairing A321's. Unless something happens to one that is deemed a total loss, I don't think AA is leaving any of their aircraft grounded.
ConstellationClass likes this.
PHL is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.