![]() |
Originally Posted by jlemon
(Post 34577873)
Flew with Lufthansa several times in western Europe very recently and on every flight an announcement was made that all window shades were required to be up during takeoffs and landings. I found this to be refreshing. I also kept my window shades up during every flight as the Alps are always a beautiful sight.
On AA the letter of the law seems to be window shades required to be open for taxi, takeoff, and landing only in exit rows. Interestingly the US regs seem to be an exception to the worldwide norm of prohibiting carry-on articles underseat in exit rows during TT&L. |
Originally Posted by salut0
(Post 34577773)
I encourage you to refuse. I don’t think people should be prevented from having shades up. Those who don’t want the sun can wear eye masks or use screen protectors. Similarly, better to have the temperature colder rather than hotter so those who are cold can put on a sweater.
In flight right now and out of the 14 windows in the F cabin, 3 are open. 2 are mine (albeit partially at cruise as it's super bright out) |
A big reason why crew like the shades closed is because it encourages people to go to sleep....and a passenger that is asleep is a passenger that can't go back to the galley to interrupt the crew's galley gossip session by asking for beverages or snacks. Insisting that the shades stay closed ensures that the flight crew has to do less work!
If someone were to ask me to lower my shade, I'd smile and say I need to keep the shade open "for medical reasons". If passengers are allowed to bring their dumb dogs on board "for medical reasons", then I should be allowed to enjoy my "emotional support scenery". |
Originally Posted by JoeDTW
(Post 34578019)
A big reason why crew like the shades closed is because it encourages people to go to sleep....and a passenger that is asleep is a passenger that can't go back to the galley to interrupt the crew's galley gossip session by asking for beverages or snacks. Insisting that the shades stay closed ensures that the flight crew has to do less work!
If someone were to ask me to lower my shade, I'd smile and say I need to keep the shade open "for medical reasons". If passengers are allowed to bring their dumb dogs on board "for medical reasons", then I should be allowed to enjoy my "emotional support scenery". One strategy I have taken if I think I might want to get some light is to select a seat on the side of the airplane that is out of the direct sun (depending on the time of the flight). For example, on TATL flights I sit on the left side eastbound and the right side westbound. On a southbound afternoon flight I would sit on the left (A) side of the plane, which would face east, away from the setting sun. This at least prevents direct sun, which I agree can be quite annoying. Although there is nothing prettier than seeing a sunset from 30,000 feet. |
Originally Posted by wetrat0
(Post 34578045)
My favorite is when you get up to go to the bathroom and the crew comes over and closes it (yes, this happens and I've seen it). They don't care what time it is, they want everyone to be asleep.
|
Short answer is yes - people want to be able to work on their laptop / read their screens, or sleep. This is a change from just five or 10 years ago.
I do almost always have my shades up at takeoff and approach, especially into and out of cities as I like to look at them. However after I am usually shades down during the Edit - On short morning flights, say 10 AM or so, I try to leave windows open the entire time... On long morning flights (like 7 AM Saturday morning), shades down. |
Originally Posted by wetrat0
(Post 34578045)
One strategy I have taken if I think I might want to get some light is to select a seat on the side of the airplane that is out of the direct sun (depending on the time of the flight). For example, on TATL flights I sit on the left side eastbound and the right side westbound. On a southbound afternoon flight I would sit on the left (A) side of the plane, which would face east, away from the setting sun. This at least prevents direct sun, which I agree can be quite annoying. Although there is nothing prettier than seeing a sunset from 30,000 feet. |
Originally Posted by wetrat0
(Post 34578045)
My favorite is when you get up to go to the bathroom and the crew comes over and closes it (yes, this happens and I've seen it). They don't care what time it is, they want everyone to be asleep
:D |
Originally Posted by Adelphos
(Post 34578148)
Short answer is yes - people want to be able to work on their laptop / read their screens, or sleep. This is a change from just five or 10 years ago.
As for working on a laptop, I do about as much of that on commercial airline flights today as I did 10 years ago. Both then and now mostly with the window shades open. I may close the shade or partially close it when there's an extreme amount of light coming in but I probably spend 75% of the time I'm working on my laptop on an aircraft with the shades fully open. I enjoy working aboard aircraft and am very productive when working aboard aircraft as long as I'm in first. It's one of the reasons I insist on flying in first class. But I only enjoy that work when I'm comfortable and relaxed. Windows sure help with that. I don't like to do my work at home, at an office, or at a client site in a coffin-like setting. I like to work with plenty of natural light streaming in. Not sure why people suddenly enjoy working in coffins when you put them inside aircraft. Since I can't distract myself from work by watching CNBC when I'm on an AA flight, I find the amazing diversity scenery out the window accompanied by a sip of Woodford Reserve or a vodka and tonic to be an enjoyable brief diversion from spreadsheets, presentations, contracts, Daily Racing Forms, etc. when airborne.
Originally Posted by wetrat0
(Post 34578045)
One strategy I have taken if I think I might want to get some light is to select a seat on the side of the airplane that is out of the direct sun (depending on the time of the flight).
|
I'm mostly fine either way. I have had a lot of situations recently where the glare from a magazine or a phone was blinding from the row in front of me. If they were in my row, I would have suggested they lower them a bit.
|
Originally Posted by salut0
(Post 34577832)
Actually, as discussed above and in my own thread about closing the window shades on daytime flights JFK-LHR, closing all the shades is highly disruptive to people who are tired from having woken up early but want to stay awake on the flight to readjust their time zone to being able to fall asleep in London on their arrival.
|
Originally Posted by Hoi polloi
(Post 34577271)
Agreed. I was on a morning CMH-CLT recently and was probably one of three (at most) windows that didn't have the shade closed on the entire plane. I couldn't recall when this started happening, but I was just kind of amazed.
I get that most people are pretty blasé about the "magic" of flight, but come on... you don't even want to be able to glance outside a little bit? To each their own, I guess. I was on a westbound transatlantic flight this week (daytime) and switched seats with someone who said he wanted to look out. I wanted to try to sleep (only try, not actually sleep) because by the time I was driving home from the airport, I would have been up for 24 hours. Unfortunately, instead of looking out the window when it was worthwhile, he read for that part of the flight and then started opening the shade every 15 minutes or so, just for a few seconds, apparently to see whether it was light or dark outside. |
Originally Posted by JoeDTW
(Post 34578019)
A big reason why crew like the shades closed is because it encourages people to go to sleep....and a passenger that is asleep is a passenger that can't go back to the galley to interrupt the crew's galley gossip session by asking for beverages or snacks. Insisting that the shades stay closed ensures that the flight crew has to do less work!
If someone were to ask me to lower my shade, I'd smile and say I need to keep the shade open "for medical reasons". If passengers are allowed to bring their dumb dogs on board "for medical reasons", then I should be allowed to enjoy my "emotional support scenery". |
This post made me laugh a little. I'm a window seat person all the way, and often have my eyes at least partially tuned to the landscape outside. Once on a Japan Airlines flight, about 30 minutes after takeoff, the flight attendants came through with a long stick and shut every single window shade on the plane. It was a day flight, so one might think that was to mitigate the warming of the cabin, but that's sort of nonsense considering JAL (like many Asian carriers) keep their cabins about 78 degrees. So if they were that worried about a wee little sunlight making the cabin warm...perhaps they could have saved some energy but letting solar do that work for them?
|
Originally Posted by dll
(Post 34578436)
the flight attendants came through with a long stick and shut every single window shade on the plane
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:52 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.