AA F versus AA J on 77W
#46
Join Date: Jun 2011
Programs: United Premier Platinum
Posts: 638
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,234
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHX & AGP
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 11,453
I would only ever burn an SWU to F on the 77W if:
I would personally never pay more to fly F over J.
- I was departing from an airport with Flagship First dining
- It was a day flight... as the chair swivel feature in the F seat is quite nice to get some work done.
- It was a long flight
I would personally never pay more to fly F over J.
The F suits swivel and it's nice if you are traveling with someone to dine with, I feel the seats are better then J, I like the J seats but at times they feel like a coffin.
AA only flys F on long haul flights.
I wish there was better ground service at LHR, the walk from the Flagship lounge to the 40's gates is quite long, a nice buggy ride would be nice.
#49
Join Date: Nov 2015
Programs: AAdvantage EXP, Marriott Ambassador (LT Titanium)
Posts: 94
Thoughts on the value of using a 2021-expiring systemwide to go J->F on LHR-LAX? With no flagship dining / no lounge benefits at all (on top of EP) at LHR, I’m wondering if it’s worth it. The 12-hour flight has me leaning towards yes but I’ve never been in the seat before so looking for opinions.
#50
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, LT Gold
Posts: 3,148
Thoughts on the value of using a 2021-expiring systemwide to go J->F on LHR-LAX? With no flagship dining / no lounge benefits at all (on top of EP) at LHR, I’m wondering if it’s worth it. The 12-hour flight has me leaning towards yes but I’ve never been in the seat before so looking for opinions.
My $0.02 is that if you're not going to use it, burn it. I really only like the F seat during the daytime flights. I don't sleep as well in them as the 77W J seat. I like the extra space, and the swivel function to have a "desk" workspace for the daytime flights.
That's really the only motivation for me. The food/drinks in F vs. J is a marginal improvement that holds little value to me.
#51
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, Total Wine & More Reserve
Posts: 4,509
Thoughts on the value of using a 2021-expiring systemwide to go J->F on LHR-LAX? With no flagship dining / no lounge benefits at all (on top of EP) at LHR, I’m wondering if it’s worth it. The 12-hour flight has me leaning towards yes but I’ve never been in the seat before so looking for opinions.
On the other hand, if you were to go from J to F on LHR-JFK-LAX, then I think it's borderline worth it since you get FFD at JFK. But that means more overall travel time.
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,247
If you have no other use for the SWU, then I'd do it. In my case, I wouldn't on that route since I just don't think J to F on 77W is worth it when I can usually find enough C space on TPAC/TATL, or even JFK-LAX/SFO throughout the year to use up my SWUs that way.
On the other hand, if you were to go from J to F on LHR-JFK-LAX, then I think it's borderline worth it since you get FFD at JFK. But that means more overall travel time.
On the other hand, if you were to go from J to F on LHR-JFK-LAX, then I think it's borderline worth it since you get FFD at JFK. But that means more overall travel time.
Ive found more C space this year than the last few years, so definitely would keep them for a impromptu vacation.
#53
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: UA 1K and PP, AA PPro (3MM, former CK), Marriott Ambassador and LTT, Uber One
Posts: 1,348
#54
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 214
Used a SWU to go from J to F on DFW-LHR earlier this year and was incredibly disappointed. I've had better service, more enthusiastic, and far nicer flight attendants from CLT-LGA. The F flight attendant could not have been more abrupt and unenthusiastic to be there. He did the bare minimum to get by, it was incredibly disappointing. It's wild that there's such a variation between flight attendants because I'm sure if I took this flight a day before or day after the service would've been far superior (and then terrible again another day before/after).
#55
Join Date: Apr 2009
Programs: American EXP; British Airways Gold
Posts: 1,896
Used a SWU to go from J to F on DFW-LHR earlier this year and was incredibly disappointed. I've had better service, more enthusiastic, and far nicer flight attendants from CLT-LGA. The F flight attendant could not have been more abrupt and unenthusiastic to be there. He did the bare minimum to get by, it was incredibly disappointing. It's wild that there's such a variation between flight attendants because I'm sure if I took this flight a day before or day after the service would've been far superior (and then terrible again another day before/after).
#56
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New York
Programs: AA EXP 1.0mm, not sure where I am with hotels these days
Posts: 2,795
I’ve used SWUs to go up from J to F on JFK GRU JFK flights and it was well worth the experience even though I was asleep for 2/3 of flight. Much more comfortable seating (for me at least). Somewhat better food and I did like the turn down service.
#58
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: UA 1K and PP, AA PPro (3MM, former CK), Marriott Ambassador and LTT, Uber One
Posts: 1,348
In all seriousness -- how do you suggest doing this? I am not someone who minds speaking up, but it doesn't seem like annoying someone you're looking to get good service from for the next 10+ hours is a good plan, and nowadays, I'd be a bit afraid of being branded a disturbance or threatening.
#59
Join Date: Apr 2009
Programs: American EXP; British Airways Gold
Posts: 1,896
It certainly will. I think people rightfully have higher expectations when in F vs J, and hence are a bit more picky and observant of small details. I have also seen many reports, here and elsewhere, that they have had their worst crews in F on the 77W. If you're expecting an elevated experience and instead have your worst crew, that's going to leave an impression. The first time I flew in AA international F, the crew was one of the worst I could recall from any of my domestic or international J experiences. On my second experience, I thought the crew was great, but the plane was badly mis-catered, which put a damper on things; still, the crew did a good job of working with what they had. On my most recent experience, I had one of the best crews I have ever experienced. Everything was "just so" as far as service. Someone came to check on drinks every 15 minutes throughout the entire flight, they offered to bring back snacks from the bar so people didn't need to adjust their seats to get up, they proactively and enthusiastically made beds, etc. The flight even ended with a handwritten note from the purser, which was more than just boilerplate.
In all seriousness -- how do you suggest doing this? I am not someone who minds speaking up, but it doesn't seem like annoying someone you're looking to get good service from for the next 10+ hours is a good plan, and nowadays, I'd be a bit afraid of being branded a disturbance or threatening.
In all seriousness -- how do you suggest doing this? I am not someone who minds speaking up, but it doesn't seem like annoying someone you're looking to get good service from for the next 10+ hours is a good plan, and nowadays, I'd be a bit afraid of being branded a disturbance or threatening.
#60
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: UA 1K and PP, AA PPro (3MM, former CK), Marriott Ambassador and LTT, Uber One
Posts: 1,348
Maybe this is just a semantic disagreement, but I interpreted your post to mean that one should tell the FA that you expect certain service standards to be met. I think that this would at a minimum lead to an awkward flight, and nowadays could lead to an even worse result for the passenger. I would agree that proactively asking for expected service items (e.g., drinks, turndown service, etc.) should be fine.