![]() |
Originally Posted by econometrics
(Post 31033124)
I didn't listen to the podcast, but I read the transcript on TPG's website.
Raja needs a communications coach. I wanted to put my head through my screen every time he repeatedly used "right". :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Adelphos
(Post 31032879)
MEM and CLE are about 1/10 and 1/8 the size of NYC, resprectively, with even smaller fractions of "premium" demand, so I don't think those are that comparable. Also, MEM was primarily a connecting hub acquired from Northwest that had no purpose with ATL nearby, from what I can remember.
Safe Travels |
Originally Posted by Adelphos
(Post 31032246)
For NYC O&D, United seems to offer the most comprehensive option for passengers if you can stomach Newark. Delta is close, but notably behind.
|
I found this article to be somewhat reassuring. I don't understand the hate re: connecting via LHR. NYC based it's great. I use it multiple times a year and it provides late departures from Europe to NYC that you can't easily get with other hubs. I can take afternoon departures from anywhere in Europe and connect to late flights LHR-JFK. I just wish BA would add more late night flights from LHR to the continent so that I could more easily use their 7:45am day flight to Europe without having to overnight in London.
|
Originally Posted by morrisunc
(Post 31033602)
I found this article to be somewhat reassuring. I don't understand the hate re: connecting via LHR. NYC based it's great. I use it multiple times a year and it provides late departures from Europe to NYC that you can't easily get with other hubs. I can take afternoon departures from anywhere in Europe and connect to late flights LHR-JFK. I just wish BA would add more late night flights from LHR to the continent so that I could more easily use their 7:45am day flight to Europe without having to overnight in London.
|
Originally Posted by morrisunc
(Post 31033602)
I found this article to be somewhat reassuring. I don't understand the hate re: connecting via LHR. NYC based it's great. I use it multiple times a year and it provides late departures from Europe to NYC that you can't easily get with other hubs. I can take afternoon departures from anywhere in Europe and connect to late flights LHR-JFK. I just wish BA would add more late night flights from LHR to the continent so that I could more easily use their 7:45am day flight to Europe without having to overnight in London.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 31033028)
This is more akin to a situation of DL at MSP than of DL at MEM and UA at CLE, even as DL@MSP is largely about connecting traffic.
JFK is the 2nd largest domestic O&D airport in the country and of course adds millions of international O&D passengers. AA's decision to compete very selectively at JFK (and across NYC broadly) is pretty surprising. One has to wonder how it sees itself fitting against UA/DL/B6 in this context. |
Originally Posted by Adelphos
(Post 31032879)
Originally Posted by Austin787
(Post 31032495)
Raja's comments about NYC sound similar to what Delta and United said about MEM and CLE respectively. We all know how it worked out for MEM and CLE.
Really, the only similarity between MEM/CLE and NYC is that in all three cases the airlines said positive things. Duh; you're not going to say "this hub is terrible and doomed" until you actually kill it.
Originally Posted by Cledaybuck
(Post 31033412)
That's because UA also runs a large connecting hub at EWR. It is those connections, not just O&D, that allow UA to offer the frequency of flights and destinations that it does at EWR.
|
Isn't Jetblue mainly O&D at JFK? Is it just because they have a lower cost structure than AA that they can be so large?
|
Originally Posted by golfingboy
(Post 31030624)
I just want to comment that there is absolutely nothing remotely premium about the e140s that makes up a substantial chunk of AA’s NYC operation.
No sbowers PHL sucks |
Originally Posted by footballfanatic
(Post 31034424)
neither is making a 35 minute connection between B and F due to banked flights, only to almost lose an upgrade because of it No sbowers PHL sucks |
Originally Posted by AANYC1981
(Post 31031286)
Not only design but some of the most vile and rude LUS employees working the gates. |
Originally Posted by GTITAN
(Post 31032579)
I don't find that actually and certainly no worse than LGA.
|
Originally Posted by footballfanatic
(Post 31034424)
neither is making a 35 minute connection between B and F due to banked flights, only to almost lose an upgrade because of it No sbowers PHL sucks
Originally Posted by AANYC1981
(Post 31031286)
Not only design but some of the most vile and rude LUS employees working the gates. |
Originally Posted by Austin787
(Post 31036247)
JFK is even worse, especially for International to domestic connections. 1+ hour lines in immigration at 5am (I can't imagine the afternoon when many flights from Europe arrive). Then a long walk with vague signage to the AirTrain. I had a much better experience at PHL - not much of a wait in immigration at 2pm (when multiple Europe flights arrive) and no need to take a train to my domestic connection.
But I think you may be thinking of a T7 to T8 international to domestic connection, bc I have never needed to use the AirTrain to connect from an AA to AA flight. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:08 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.