Help Suing AA in Small Claims Please [denied boarding - weight restricted]
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,738
#17
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Bottom line is that the absolute most OP gets if he were to sue and win -- which he won't -- is some token for the value of 1/2-day of some workshop. No idea what that cost, but if it's a 2-day workshop, he gets 25% of what he paid. Can't be that much.
For those who think that AA won't defend, they simply don't understand. Operating businesses understand that they are marks. AA will gladly spend $2,600 to defend a $1,300 claim, particularly when some paralegal in Fort Worth can generate a removal notice to federal court -- as he likely does 100x/day.
All they or any carrier needs is some article about how easy it is to get a default, so they don't let it happen.
When do they settle? When they look at the facts and figure that customer service screwed up and should have paid earlier.
#18
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: DC
Programs: AA Plat, MVP Gold, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 121
I agree with the above whole-heartedly. Even if AA hires a schmoe lawyer to defend an improperly filed suit, it is still going to cost on the order of $1-2k, minimum. More than likely they will just settle by offering you some compensation. I can't tell you how many times on small matters I have said I'm going to sue (as a plaintiff) or go ahead and sue me (as a defendant) and the other side gives up. The reality is that litigating costs money (even if your case is a 100% winner) and they can probably get out cheaper by offering you a voucher.
Now, the other side of the coin is that some businesses take a stance of "we'll litigate this regardless of the cost to avoid a deluge of similar nuisance suits." It's possible that AA would do this, but I think it unlikely for two reasons. First, litigation fees are real, hard cash, whereas vouchers are just paper money. Second, I suspect that AA is just trying to keep costs as low as possible and isn't out to make a point here (I wouldn't think these types of suits are all that common--most people here apparently wouldn't file one).
Now, the other side of the coin is that some businesses take a stance of "we'll litigate this regardless of the cost to avoid a deluge of similar nuisance suits." It's possible that AA would do this, but I think it unlikely for two reasons. First, litigation fees are real, hard cash, whereas vouchers are just paper money. Second, I suspect that AA is just trying to keep costs as low as possible and isn't out to make a point here (I wouldn't think these types of suits are all that common--most people here apparently wouldn't file one).
Last edited by aves17; Aug 5, 2015 at 3:26 pm
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,476
First, let me state that I am not a lawyer.
Second, when we schedule travel, we must accept that things will occasionally go sideways. If they do, we must make a rational, informed decision as to how to proceed. You can always declare "a trip in vain" and get your money back at some point, if you are not going to make a 1-day workshop/conference/wedding/event. In the future, if you NEED to be at such an event, please consider leaving the day before to try to avoid this type of situation.
I would suggest politely contacting customer service, succinctly explaining the situation, and asking for adequate compensation.
Second, when we schedule travel, we must accept that things will occasionally go sideways. If they do, we must make a rational, informed decision as to how to proceed. You can always declare "a trip in vain" and get your money back at some point, if you are not going to make a 1-day workshop/conference/wedding/event. In the future, if you NEED to be at such an event, please consider leaving the day before to try to avoid this type of situation.
I would suggest politely contacting customer service, succinctly explaining the situation, and asking for adequate compensation.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
IANAL.
IMHO, if I were the OP, I would still file the case even I have no chance to win. Once the case has filed, unless both sides settle, only the court has the final say on the merits. It is within OP's rights to do whatever he/she wants regardless what we all said here. But bottom line, only a judge can say OP has a case or not.
Also, filing a case does not mean starting a war. In fact, in many instances, the filing actually helps bringing both sides to the same table to work out the problems. And many companies work out problems with the plaintiffs regardless of merits.
However, OP should keep in mind a key point - being reasonable. Of course, airlines could potentially cost you ToDs for something really stupid. It does not mean you are entitled to recover those ToDs spent. If OP believes that he/she is entitled for IDB compensation, IMHO, this should be the amount in question, nothing more and nothing less.
Absolutely not.
1. Through Discovery. However, discovery rules for Small Claims courts are more trickier than typical litigation.
2. You are not due IDB compensation anyway as the route serves by an exempted aircraft.
ADA (Airline Deregulation Act) preempts all state claims related to prices, routes, or services of an airline.
IMHO, if I were the OP, I would still file the case even I have no chance to win. Once the case has filed, unless both sides settle, only the court has the final say on the merits. It is within OP's rights to do whatever he/she wants regardless what we all said here. But bottom line, only a judge can say OP has a case or not.
Also, filing a case does not mean starting a war. In fact, in many instances, the filing actually helps bringing both sides to the same table to work out the problems. And many companies work out problems with the plaintiffs regardless of merits.
However, OP should keep in mind a key point - being reasonable. Of course, airlines could potentially cost you ToDs for something really stupid. It does not mean you are entitled to recover those ToDs spent. If OP believes that he/she is entitled for IDB compensation, IMHO, this should be the amount in question, nothing more and nothing less.
Absolutely not.
2. You are not due IDB compensation anyway as the route serves by an exempted aircraft.
ADA (Airline Deregulation Act) preempts all state claims related to prices, routes, or services of an airline.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
As others have said, no. You have no case, not in small claims court nor federal district court.
Situations like these are learning opportunities. If it's really important to be there, then getting there the evening before is the best advice.
#22
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
To all who " chided" OP for going on the DAY OF, one has to consider the time lost at work due to travel day before, hotel, meals, car expenses over and above Day of event has to be factored in, the company or person may not allow this.
A follow up question
For those more experienced, does AA or other airlines retaliate against those who sue them viv a vis, cancel their FF account ?
A follow up question
For those more experienced, does AA or other airlines retaliate against those who sue them viv a vis, cancel their FF account ?
#23
Formerly known as billinaz
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Goodyear,AZ for now then FL Spacecoast
Programs: US Airways Dividend Miles, American AAdvantage, Avis Preferred, Budget Rapid Rez, Hilton Honors
Posts: 1,145
Even if you file in small claims court, the other side still has option to ask for the case to go to a civil division court. This makes it possible for their lawyers to be involved (no lawyers are permitted in small claims court).
Now that your case is in civil court, you will most likely going to need to hire a lawyer. If you can find one to take this case, be ready to shell out money.
Then when you loose, AA's lawyers now ask the court for reimbursement of court and attorneys fees.
Be ready to shell out more money.
All I can say is, don't do it. If you do, let us know how it works out so we can tell you we told you so.
Now that your case is in civil court, you will most likely going to need to hire a lawyer. If you can find one to take this case, be ready to shell out money.
Then when you loose, AA's lawyers now ask the court for reimbursement of court and attorneys fees.
Be ready to shell out more money.
All I can say is, don't do it. If you do, let us know how it works out so we can tell you we told you so.
#24
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: DC
Programs: AA Plat, MVP Gold, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 121
#26
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: DC
Programs: AA Plat, MVP Gold, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 121
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,907
IAAL.
Speaking only of Massachusetts, the defendant (AA in this case) does not have to show up in small claims court. If a defendant loses in small claims court, even by default, s/he/it has the right to remove the matter to the regular civil court for a trial de novo, as if the small claims court had never heard the matter. To be clear, however, I am not giving anyone legal advice; and you should not rely on this as legal advice. If someone sues you, in any court, you should talk to an attorney as soon as possible in order to preserve your rights under the law.No.
The information is available to the public, but I'm just not sure where. In any case, it doesn't matter. Lots of flights on small aircraft are or become weight-restricted. Depends on pax load, freight load, checked baggage load, weather (including air temperature), etc.A flight can become weight-restricted at the very last minute. I'm sure that AA intended to fly you when it sold you the ticket.
In most states, though apparently not Illinois, attorneys can appear in small claims court, if for no other reason than that corporations cannot represent themselves because while a corporation is a legal "person," it's not an actual person. The President/Chairman/CEO/etc. of a corporation is an employee, but not the corporation, itself. In Massachusetts, corporations are required to be represented in court by an attorney.Courts in the U.S. operate on the American system, surprisingly enough, under which everyone pays their own attorney fees unless there is a specific statute or provision in a contract which provides otherwise.
Speaking only of Massachusetts, the defendant (AA in this case) does not have to show up in small claims court. If a defendant loses in small claims court, even by default, s/he/it has the right to remove the matter to the regular civil court for a trial de novo, as if the small claims court had never heard the matter. To be clear, however, I am not giving anyone legal advice; and you should not rely on this as legal advice. If someone sues you, in any court, you should talk to an attorney as soon as possible in order to preserve your rights under the law.No.
Last edited by Dr. HFH; Aug 5, 2015 at 10:30 pm
#28
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sunshine State
Programs: Avis Trump. Costco Exec. SPG PLAT PREM-90. WN A+/CP. AA SLV. Nat EE..
Posts: 456
Now my case was a bit different from the OP's, I didn't ask to cover any out of pocket costs or my own time (lost) and I had good evidence of the problem as well as the hotel managers moronic emails that weren't very nice so I got an apology from the regional manager and a free hotel stay (more than I asked for) and some comped nights in the future which I never used.
Point being, if you think you have a good case (doesn't appear you do) and you're willing to waste a day of your own time and not be reimbursed it's a good experience to see how the process works.
I'm also the only (non-lawyer) person I know that has successfully beaten a speeding ticket and helped a few of my neighbors do the same by giving them my research.
Think of it as changing your own oil or mowing the grass.
#29
Formerly known as billinaz
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Goodyear,AZ for now then FL Spacecoast
Programs: US Airways Dividend Miles, American AAdvantage, Avis Preferred, Budget Rapid Rez, Hilton Honors
Posts: 1,145
Who Can File a Small Claim?
The small claims court can be used by any individual, partnership, association or corporation for civil claims that do not exceed $3,500. Small claims cases are simplified, therefore, lawyers are not allowed.
#30
Formerly known as billinaz
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Goodyear,AZ for now then FL Spacecoast
Programs: US Airways Dividend Miles, American AAdvantage, Avis Preferred, Budget Rapid Rez, Hilton Honors
Posts: 1,145
IAAL.
Speaking only of Massachusetts, the defendant (AA in this case) does not have to show up in small claims court. If a defendant loses in small claims court, even by default, s/he/it has the right to remove the matter to the regular civil court for a trial de novo, as if the small claims court had never heard the matter.No.The information is available to the public, but I'm just not sure where. In any case, it doesn't matter. Lots of flights on small aircraft are or become weight-restricted. Depends on pax load, freight load, checked baggage load, weather (including air temperature), etc.A flight can become weight-restricted at the very last minute. I'm sure that AA intended to fly you when it sold you the ticket.In most states, though apparently not Illinois, attorneys can appear in small claims court, if for no other reason than that corporations cannot represent themselves because while a corporation is a legal "person," it's not an actual person. The President/Chairman/CEO/etc. of a corporation is an employee, but not the corporation, itself. In Massachusetts, corporations are required to be represented in court by an attorney.Courts in the U.S. operate on the American system, surprisingly enough, under which everyone pays their own attorney fees unless there is a specific statute or provision in a contract which provides otherwise.
Speaking only of Massachusetts, the defendant (AA in this case) does not have to show up in small claims court. If a defendant loses in small claims court, even by default, s/he/it has the right to remove the matter to the regular civil court for a trial de novo, as if the small claims court had never heard the matter.No.The information is available to the public, but I'm just not sure where. In any case, it doesn't matter. Lots of flights on small aircraft are or become weight-restricted. Depends on pax load, freight load, checked baggage load, weather (including air temperature), etc.A flight can become weight-restricted at the very last minute. I'm sure that AA intended to fly you when it sold you the ticket.In most states, though apparently not Illinois, attorneys can appear in small claims court, if for no other reason than that corporations cannot represent themselves because while a corporation is a legal "person," it's not an actual person. The President/Chairman/CEO/etc. of a corporation is an employee, but not the corporation, itself. In Massachusetts, corporations are required to be represented in court by an attorney.Courts in the U.S. operate on the American system, surprisingly enough, under which everyone pays their own attorney fees unless there is a specific statute or provision in a contract which provides otherwise.
And corporations are required to appear in AZ. I sued a health care clinic in small claims court after they mishandled a blood sample and negligently told me my kids life was in imminent danger. I simply had to serve their statutory agent. All corporations are required to have one for legal process.... such as this.