Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

ARCHIVED: LAX-MIA on AA: Best, Aircraft Used, etc. NONWORKING THREAD

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Apr 1, 2016, 11:26 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
LAX <-> MIA: Aircraft Used and Changes, Class Sold, Best Service, etc.

Aircraft scheduled on this route have recently included
Three class aircraft may be sold as two class aircraft, offering opportunities to elites to fly in better cabins.

Schedules do change routinely, and aircraft substitutions are not uncommon.

* The "32B" designation used by AA includes three variants of the LAA A321-200. All the LAA A321-200s have Sharklets wingtip devices: the A321S two class aircraft, A321H Hawaiian ETOPS variance and the A321T three class generally used between JFK and LAX, SFO. These are all "32B" aircraft in AA schedules; "321" is used by AA for non-Sharklets, LUS, A321-200s.
Print Wikipost

ARCHIVED: LAX-MIA on AA: Best, Aircraft Used, etc. NONWORKING THREAD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2015, 5:56 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: los angeles, calif.
Programs: Alaska Airlines Gold MVP
Posts: 7,170
Originally Posted by bhrubin
I am sorry, but you are in error. They HAVE changed the 772 flights; it has departed early from LAX (as early as 6:50 am) and mid afternoon 12:30 pm or 2:35 pm in the past several months alone, and has been switched out on numerous occasions.
I am not in error. There are multiple 772 flights on MIA-LAX (some times, but rarely, as many as three daily). One of them changes a lot, the other has not changed since 2006 with one exception for seven weeks one summer when the plane operated an MIA-EZE daylight. This plane is purposely scheduled as a back-up for the Shanghai/Narita departures, hence why the schedule never changes. It usually does an LAX-MIA-LAX turn, but sometimes goes onto/arrives from Shanghai and/or Tokyo.

You are perfectly justified in being upset at AA if they refuse to move you to a 3-class flight. You shouldn't have trouble being accommodated, and if an agent gives you trouble, try again.
MAH4546 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 6:22 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ORD
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 2,781
Originally Posted by MAH4546
You are perfectly justified in being upset at AA if they refuse to move you to a 3-class flight. You shouldn't have trouble being accommodated, and if an agent gives you trouble, try again.
This.

Keep in mind that AA has a "placeholder" schedule for lights more than 3 months out that allows them to approximate the service they anticipate operating, subject to changes. The actual schedule is loaded once a month roughly 90 days from departure, at which point it should remain fairly constant. If you're booking more than three months out, expect some changes.

There is very little rhyme or reason to AA's rebooking algorithm, other than it will reaccommodate you using Price is Right scheduling (as close as possible to your original departure, but not later if possible), and in case of connections, will try to minimize your connection time. If you can take a deep breath and check your reservations once a month, then by all means fly AA. If you don't have 10-20 minutes to spare to fix any problems that come up, consider giving your business to another airline.
linglingfool is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 6:24 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ORD
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 2,781
Originally Posted by hiima
I am in the same boat, but an award flight in late January. They literally took me off my 5 pm flight and put me in 2pm. I tried calling in and the csr said they don't have any saver award available for that flight. I don't care about saver award, I just want my original flight time back. I'm gonna huca, but since it's an award flight, I'm probably gonna settle with getting nothing.
If your original flight is still operating at (approximately) the same time, be polite but firm that they should give you the itinerary that you booked. That may entail a call to revenue management to open up space for you, or rebooking you into a revenue bucket, but there should be a way to get it done.
linglingfool is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 10:11 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: US
Programs: AAdvantage
Posts: 1,753
While I understand that the airline technically reserves the right to change equipment/schedules/routing, the issue for me in this case is:

Originally Posted by bhrubin
They charge more for the 777 LAX-MIA in F, understandably, since it's internationally configured for 3 classes.
On MIA-LAX, AA charges a premium for F on a 3-class flight. The J fare on the 3-class flight is typically equal to the F fare on the 2-class flight.

If AA can't rebook the OP onto another 3-class flight, they should refund the fare difference between the 3-classs F fare the OP paid and the 2-class F fare for the flight the OP was moved to.
ThreeJulietTango is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 10:57 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP...couple hotels and cars too
Posts: 4,548
Be nice if there was a flag in a record that says "high value pax, CALL before (or when) flight schedule changes"

Not everyone, but lets say you are EXP and/or paying over 1000 a seat and/or in a 'special priced 3 cabin F'
Exec_Plat is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2015, 11:37 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: LAX, LGB, SNA
Programs: AA EXP OWE, DL DM ST+, AS MVPG, UA, BA, WN CP, Hyatt E, Ritz Plat, HH GM
Posts: 3,185
Originally Posted by linglingfool
If your original flight is still operating at (approximately) the same time, be polite but firm that they should give you the itinerary that you booked. That may entail a call to revenue management to open up space for you, or rebooking you into a revenue bucket, but there should be a way to get it done.
Original flight is still operating, but with a different flight number. Same flight time.
hiima is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2015, 2:53 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN/YYZ/YKF
Programs: COdbaUA 1K MM, AA EXP, Bonbon Gold, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, NEXUS and GE
Posts: 5,839
Originally Posted by JDiver
AA aircraft stability on MIA-LAX is always in flux, depending on IOPC / Dispatch's need to reposition aircraft. If it was about offering premium cabins, they'd surely charge more for this service, as they do for nonstop 321T service between JFK and LAX / SFO vs connecting services using the usual narrowbodies.

Actually, they do charge a premium for the 3 class F on that route. Not to mention the give added benefits, which would disappear with a plane type change.
N1120A is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2015, 8:22 am
  #68  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,392
Originally Posted by bhrubin
AA doesn't seem to warrant my business except when it's the only best option--and LAX-MIA is it for me. Otherwise, AA isn't for me. I'll take UA or whatever airline serves me nonstop in premium class to my destination otherwise.
Then I would suggest not paying the premium for your advanced bookings on AA three-class F on LAX-MIA-LAX, until such time as the schedules are "locked in" (which is apparently a month out). This makes it such that it becomes relatively irrelevant if they switch you to 763 F or 757/738 F from 77W J (which is what I would assume you get in this instance). In fact, you could completely avoid the 77W flights until fairly close in, knowing that they are likely to cause inconvenience for you due to AA equipment schedule changes, due to your well-in-advance ticket purchases.

It doesn't seem to make much sense to pay a premium for a product that is causing you inconvenience because of your needs (need to book well in advance, up to 6 months, very much unlike most passengers, need premium class, want the fancy international longhaul seats) and AA's operational needs (don't finalize equipment schedules until 30 days out or so to match what they think they need to do) don't work very well together.

Presumably the difference in price between three-class F on the 77W LAX-MIA and F everywhere else on LAX-MIA is one that could be paid later, if you really DID think the premium was worth it once you knew what equipment was flying?

Last edited by eponymous_coward; Oct 29, 2015 at 8:31 am
eponymous_coward is online now  
Old Jan 21, 2016, 6:20 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 85
LAX to MIA (3-class 777): difference between domestic first and domestic business

Hi All,

I have upgraded a LAX-MIA ticket from domestic business to domestic first (this is on a 3-class old 777).

Obviously the seat will be much different. On the soft product side, is there any difference for the meal and/or in terms of service onboard ? (is it similar to the 3-class offering on a transcontinental for instance?)

Thank you for your help
F-I-L.
FrenchInLondon is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2016, 6:31 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 5,270
It is the 3-class offering on a transcontinental, by definition

I think the only distinguishing factor over and above business class is an additional entree selection and perhaps an amuse-bouche.
rjw242 is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2016, 7:09 am
  #71  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 85
Thank you !

Thanks for clarifying that a LAX-MIA on a 3-class 777 is by definition a 3-class offering on a transcontinental ;-) I thought this name was reserved for the A321T liaisons...
FrenchInLondon is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2016, 9:15 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WAS/TYO
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP (3MM), DL PM, BONVOY TITANIUM, HYATT GLOBALIST, HILTON DIAMOND, IHG DIAMOND AMB, et al
Posts: 5,913
A couple of other minor differences off the top of my head...

- slightly better wine list, including non-vintage Champagne and Port
- additional starter selection
- plating of meals is better (they're not pre-plated like in J)
- ice cream sundaes served in real sundae bowls
- in theory, service should be slightly more personilzed in a 8F(77W)/16F(772) cabin compared to the large J cabin, but this is highly crew dependent

That's about it, as best I can remember.

-FlyerBeek
FlyerBeek is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2016, 10:52 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SFO, LON
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, Bonvoy Tit, Hilton Dia etc etc
Posts: 2,354
The amuse bouche is gone. The wines are usually better, yes. FlyerBeek is correct on the other points: The plating and service is usually the main difference, much more like International F, you should not see a cart, for example, or a tray, nor will there be any paper S&P packets

In the end, though, the seat really is the main difference. While it's not such a big deal on the odd 77W you get from LAX-MIA, it's a nice upgrade seating-wise on the 777 for sure and IMO and more contentiously, on the A321T, the latter especially on a red-eye.
MarkedMan is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2016, 12:21 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: JFK > LGA >> EWR
Programs: AA EXP 1.2mm, Kimpton IC, Starwood Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,180
F gets a choice of appetizer (J just gets whichever one they have that day).

F gets Flagship Lounge access.
SJC AA is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2016, 3:09 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,774
LAX-MIA 77W first/business class.

I haven't seen any review on LAX-MIA first/business class on the new 77W aircraft. I am just curious if you will receive the same premium class perks on this domestic route as the international route?

I mean, same type of meal, same amenity kit, etc. I believe they're doing this on JFK routes, so I am just curious if the same will be applied on the cross-country flight between LAX-MIA ?
uclacolumbiaunc is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.