![]() |
Will RDMs in late 2016 be based off miles flown or $ spent? If it is based off miles flown, should we expect something like (miles flown * 0.25) for deep discount tickets vs (miles flown * 1.5) for full fare F? Again, I appreciate you providing us with this info, JohnNYC.
|
Originally Posted by okrogius
(Post 25670939)
-100% EQM for cheap fares.
|
Originally Posted by rendezvous
(Post 25670985)
Will RDMs in late 2016 be based off miles flown or $ spent? If it is based off miles flown, should we expect something like (miles flown * 0.25) for deep discount tickets vs (miles flown * 1.5) for full fare F? Again, I appreciate you providing us with this info, JohnNYC.
|
Originally Posted by nk15
(Post 25670975)
These are all from the future, they haven't happened yet...:D
It is Jon McFly with the DeLorean...:) The new earning chart for BA was published just a couple days ago on aa.com. |
Originally Posted by dw
(Post 25670987)
For now. I have a feeling this is just part of the transition where we are eased into a new system where EQMs are more closely tied to fare class. Perhaps in 2017 cheap fares will drop to 25-50% EQMs
Regardless, the more time we can buy, the better. Even if they have the intention of devaluing further in 2017 (which seems pretty likely), we can at least enjoy this coming year and have the added possibility of circumstances that could arise to preempt another change/devaluation. |
I doubt the joint venture J bonus eqm will be anywhere as rewarding as the AA side so I would not be suprised if it were only 125% for J as now it is 1.5 or 150% eqp...
This is propably worse for those who fly premium economy/full Y. Lets hope I am wrong but at least there is some hope :) |
Originally Posted by dw
(Post 25670987)
For now. I have a feeling this is just part of the transition where we are eased into a new system where EQMs are more closely tied to fare class. Perhaps in 2017 cheap fares will drop to 25-50% EQMs
|
I'm willing to trade some SWU for NQOS having 100% EQM and keeping EXP at 90k + 10k for the credit card spend. It's not like these are 2000 VIP2s, which booked straight into J as long as you had J1 available. And I'm comfortable looking for a mix of good deals on BA 787 PE out of YYZ/PHL and I fares ex-Europe. I'd like a few SWU in case I have to do JFK-SFO or DFW-HNL, but I'm not going to use all 8 of mine this year as it is.
The thing that will squash EQP for me would be having to buy A or non-GNQOS fares domestically to requalify. At that point, I'll never see domestic F again unless buying A, and would have no reason to fly more than what gets me into MCE at ticketing. As far as RDMs go, earning ~3500 RDM on a $59 ORD-LAX one-way as a PLT/EXP is idiotic, since at a RDM valuation of $0.018 you're essentially flying for free. Obviously, that has to change. |
Originally Posted by ElmhurstNick
(Post 25671015)
...As far as RDMs go, earning ~3500 RDM on a $59 ORD-LAX one-way as a PLT/EXP is idiotic, since at a RDM valuation of $0.018 you're essentially flying for free. Obviously, that has to change.
|
Originally Posted by JonNYC
(Post 25670917)
Will be all EQMs, solving the problem of a "mixed" flyer where a few premium/full-Y/etc tickets get buried (and therefore unrewarded) under AAdv's current system.
To be honest it kinda makes a lot of sense now. Drive the HVCs towards the other airlines, devalue the product, and realign the FFP towards LVCs and then you capture that entire alienated market which DL and UA had cast aside in search of higher spend elites. I have to say, that's pretty deep thinking coming from US management. I underestimated their ability to think outside the box. It will be very interesting going forward to see which course pans out more effectively. Realistically, there's room for both types of airlines to exist in the same market I suppose. |
Originally Posted by ElmhurstNick
(Post 25671015)
As far as RDMs go, earning ~3500 RDM on a $59 ORD-LAX one-way as a PLT/EXP is idiotic, since at a RDM valuation of $0.018 you're essentially flying for free. Obviously, that has to change.
|
Originally Posted by cmd320
(Post 25671026)
Ohhhh, hahaha! All along I had thought AA was going to target the HVC like DL and UA have been. I never stopped to think they were going to target the other end of the market...
To be honest it kinda makes a lot of sense now. Drive the HVCs towards the other airlines, devalue the product, and realign the FFP towards LVCs and then you capture that entire alienated market which DL and UA had cast aside in search of higher spend elites. I have to say, that's pretty deep thinking coming from US management. I underestimated their ability to think outside the box. It will be very interesting going forward to see which course pans out more effectively. Realistically, there's room for both types of airlines to exist in the same market I suppose. Dougie's demand forecasting guys seem to have a bit of a clue about trip generation to go along with their love of capacity discipline. |
I think in the long run this could work. Mixed flyers being okay and J/F flyers winning while Y (economy) flyer holding on for life and so on :) bit time will show. I just hope they add some more benefits for EXPs on international flights or there wont be much reason to fly the extra 50k on OW
|
Originally Posted by JonNYC
(Post 25671016)
For sure. Good example too is folks on the other end of the spectrum who buy very expensive tix on very short routes, they'll no longer get the short end-- and I think that's eminently fair.
So it looks like it will be like DL-style earning for partners, cheap fares earn 25% RDM or something like that. Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. Manufactured spend is the new mileage run... |
Originally Posted by JonNYC
(Post 25670955)
This is starting this coming year, so 2016 flight activity for 2017 qualification.
Thanks again, one of the threads of the year for sure! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:17 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.