Difference in culture: AA and US Elites
#16
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PBI/FLL/MIA
Programs: DL DM/2MM, MR Ambassador, National EE
Posts: 1,614
The difference is, of course, that AA is a Premium Airline, as evidenced by its continued reliance on those ultra-high-end flying palaces, those Ritz-Carltons with wings, the MD-80s, of which we mere mortals are permitted to speak only in reverent whispers and while shielding our eyes from the brilliance of their glory. And, of course, much the same is true of those brave Adonises, those Cadillacs of men, the AAdvantage elites, who jet off to the world's darkest places merely to light them with the glow of their heavenly auras.
Meanwhile, US Airways is obviously the most ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-low-cost carrier in the country, if not the world, and its so-called "Preferred" members are the very worst sort of boorish nouveau riche riffraff, whose "status" comes only from their willingness to accept connections (rather than flying solely paid F nonstop transcon/TATL/TPAC direct from the bustling, cosmopolitan hub metropoleis in which AA elites live) and to whip out their wallets and pay Dougie for the privilege of flying in what US so laughably calls "first class". Why, they even use stemless glassware! Any real Premium(TM) flyer would faint dead away at the suggestion of such a thing.
Anyway, that's the difference in a nutshell.
Meanwhile, US Airways is obviously the most ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-low-cost carrier in the country, if not the world, and its so-called "Preferred" members are the very worst sort of boorish nouveau riche riffraff, whose "status" comes only from their willingness to accept connections (rather than flying solely paid F nonstop transcon/TATL/TPAC direct from the bustling, cosmopolitan hub metropoleis in which AA elites live) and to whip out their wallets and pay Dougie for the privilege of flying in what US so laughably calls "first class". Why, they even use stemless glassware! Any real Premium(TM) flyer would faint dead away at the suggestion of such a thing.
Anyway, that's the difference in a nutshell.
#17
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: ALB
Programs: AA EXP, HHonors Diamond, Nexus
Posts: 432
Thread's living up to expectations so far.
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Rather than culture it comes down to product and who is willing to pay for what level of product. If one is not insanely biased, one can clearly see that pmUS was a very downmarket product and priced (and thus frequented by) a different segment of fliers
Now, we all want to be politically correct and not flame anyone, and thus we all keep silent but we can all see how far pmAA has fallen and (even worse) how much further it is going to fall.
There will be no happy mediums here. The new AA will end up looking just like pmUS. It is just being done in stages. The final goal of the pmUS leadership is to FULLY CONVERT pmAA into pmUS. As a simple example look at what is happening with the 772 refit. After the first batch is done with a higher number of J, the next batch will have a lower number of J and then even the first batch will be retrofitted to remove J!
In a perfect world pmAA would have merged with pmCO and would have had a broadly similar set of products. pmAA would still have been superior (due to the availability of Premium First) but the harmonization would have been easier. Also, then the newAA would have ruled Texas
Whether one wants to admit it or not, pmAA was the most premium airline in the US. pmUA, pmDL, pmNW, pmCO were all far behind and pmUS was not even considered a "real airline" ... just a collection of shaky and rattling old planes held together by desperation..
Now, we all want to be politically correct and not flame anyone, and thus we all keep silent but we can all see how far pmAA has fallen and (even worse) how much further it is going to fall.
There will be no happy mediums here. The new AA will end up looking just like pmUS. It is just being done in stages. The final goal of the pmUS leadership is to FULLY CONVERT pmAA into pmUS. As a simple example look at what is happening with the 772 refit. After the first batch is done with a higher number of J, the next batch will have a lower number of J and then even the first batch will be retrofitted to remove J!
In a perfect world pmAA would have merged with pmCO and would have had a broadly similar set of products. pmAA would still have been superior (due to the availability of Premium First) but the harmonization would have been easier. Also, then the newAA would have ruled Texas
Whether one wants to admit it or not, pmAA was the most premium airline in the US. pmUA, pmDL, pmNW, pmCO were all far behind and pmUS was not even considered a "real airline" ... just a collection of shaky and rattling old planes held together by desperation..
#19
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP, UA *S, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium, Hyatt Exp, IHG Plat, National EE, Sixt Plat
Posts: 648
Yep!
<-- written sarcastically
Love it! And in case that you wanted proof that your analysis isn't all that exaggerated...
written genuinely -->
The difference is, of course, that AA is a Premium Airline, as evidenced by its continued reliance on those ultra-high-end flying palaces, those Ritz-Carltons with wings, the MD-80s, of which we mere mortals are permitted to speak only in reverent whispers and while shielding our eyes from the brilliance of their glory. And, of course, much the same is true of those brave Adonises, those Cadillacs of men, the AAdvantage elites, who jet off to the world's darkest places merely to light them with the glow of their heavenly auras.
Meanwhile, US Airways is obviously the most ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-low-cost carrier in the country, if not the world, and its so-called "Preferred" members are the very worst sort of boorish nouveau riche riffraff, whose "status" comes only from their willingness to accept connections (rather than flying solely paid F nonstop transcon/TATL/TPAC direct from the bustling, cosmopolitan hub metropoleis in which AA elites live) and to whip out their wallets and pay Dougie for the privilege of flying in what US so laughably calls "first class". Why, they even use stemless glassware! Any real Premium(TM) flyer would faint dead away at the suggestion of such a thing.
Anyway, that's the difference in a nutshell.
Meanwhile, US Airways is obviously the most ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra-low-cost carrier in the country, if not the world, and its so-called "Preferred" members are the very worst sort of boorish nouveau riche riffraff, whose "status" comes only from their willingness to accept connections (rather than flying solely paid F nonstop transcon/TATL/TPAC direct from the bustling, cosmopolitan hub metropoleis in which AA elites live) and to whip out their wallets and pay Dougie for the privilege of flying in what US so laughably calls "first class". Why, they even use stemless glassware! Any real Premium(TM) flyer would faint dead away at the suggestion of such a thing.
Anyway, that's the difference in a nutshell.
Love it! And in case that you wanted proof that your analysis isn't all that exaggerated...
written genuinely -->
#20
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Rather than culture it comes down to product and who is willing to pay for what level of product. If one is not insanely biased, one can clearly see that pmUS was a very downmarket product and priced (and thus frequented by) a different segment of fliers
Now, we all want to be politically correct and not flame anyone, and thus we all keep silent but we can all see how far pmAA has fallen and (even worse) how much further it is going to fall.
There will be no happy mediums here. The new AA will end up looking just like pmUS. It is just being done in stages. The final goal of the pmUS leadership is to FULLY CONVERT pmAA into pmUS. As a simple example look at what is happening with the 772 refit. After the first batch is done with a higher number of J, the next batch will have a lower number of J and then even the first batch will be retrofitted to remove J!
In a perfect world pmAA would have merged with pmCO and would have had a broadly similar set of products. pmAA would still have been superior (due to the availability of Premium First) but the harmonization would have been easier. Also, then the newAA would have ruled Texas
Whether one wants to admit it or not, pmAA was the most premium airline in the US. pmUA, pmDL, pmNW, pmCO were all far behind and pmUS was not even considered a "real airline" ... just a collection of shaky and rattling old planes held together by desperation..
Now, we all want to be politically correct and not flame anyone, and thus we all keep silent but we can all see how far pmAA has fallen and (even worse) how much further it is going to fall.
There will be no happy mediums here. The new AA will end up looking just like pmUS. It is just being done in stages. The final goal of the pmUS leadership is to FULLY CONVERT pmAA into pmUS. As a simple example look at what is happening with the 772 refit. After the first batch is done with a higher number of J, the next batch will have a lower number of J and then even the first batch will be retrofitted to remove J!
In a perfect world pmAA would have merged with pmCO and would have had a broadly similar set of products. pmAA would still have been superior (due to the availability of Premium First) but the harmonization would have been easier. Also, then the newAA would have ruled Texas
Whether one wants to admit it or not, pmAA was the most premium airline in the US. pmUA, pmDL, pmNW, pmCO were all far behind and pmUS was not even considered a "real airline" ... just a collection of shaky and rattling old planes held together by desperation..
#21
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC LAX RDU
Programs: US-Plt;Concierge key; American AAirpass; Delta Silver;Starwood - Platinum; Amex Cent
Posts: 710
Anyone who thinks there is anything premium about pmAA clearly has never flown private and spends most of their dining dollars at the Olive Garden.
I would say the best looking and bessex dressed people on the combined aa/us network tend to be on Clt-lga flights.
Last edited by morrisunc; Sep 25, 2014 at 9:38 am
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
I hear you though. Perhaps if you're into frats you should check out DL. SkyClubs are quite the frat houses these days...
#23
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 2,085
Because Dallas is such a glamorous world-class city in comparison.
#24
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 2,085
This is a joke, right? Take a look at the majority of aa "elites" siting in their upgraded f seat - usually poorly dressed and overweight and excited about eating a $10 meal on airline china. The majority of these people are hardly elite. And they proudly put their baggage tags on their cheap roller bags so everyone can see they are "elite". I think most of these people are bitter from a life of being denied a seat at the cool kids table so they fly 100,000 miles to they can feel "elite" and "cool" and "included". Hey look - I couldn't get into a cool frat or country club, but did you know I'm a member of the Admirals Club?
Anyone who thinks there is anything premium about pmAA clearly has never flown private and spends most of their dining dollars at the Olive Garden.
I would say the best looking and bessex dressed people on the combined aa/us network tend to be on Clt-lga flights.
Anyone who thinks there is anything premium about pmAA clearly has never flown private and spends most of their dining dollars at the Olive Garden.
I would say the best looking and bessex dressed people on the combined aa/us network tend to be on Clt-lga flights.
#25
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Texas
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton Diamond, Hertz Five Star, Avis First
Posts: 902
The ONLY factor the pmUS people love to trot out is that pmUS was "profitable" and pmAA was not. Well, that is not carrots to carrots. pmUS had already been through bankruptcy and reduced its cost. pmAA had not done that.
Once pmAA went through the bankruptcy process (and also became a carrot), it started generating more profits than pmUS
However, this point is conveniently forgotten by the pmUS cheering squad.
At this point, there is NOTHING us pmAA people can do. Hence, the "shut up and bear it" attitude. pmUS won and we will all soon be like pmUS... yay for us!!
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
I think this could be one of my biggest gripes with this whole AA vs US nonsense. Since I live in DC and have flown US for the last 10 years due to the fact that they got me where I needed to go out of DCA, almost always in First class, and needed the Shuttle, I am looked down upon by those from AA. US was the carrier of convenience and just worked for me. I didn't know DC was such a backwater place to be that I am a very different customer base than those high class AA people.
Because Dallas is such a glamorous world-class city in comparison.
Because Dallas is such a glamorous world-class city in comparison.
This has nothing to do with each elite personally and everything to do with what was expected of the two separate airlines from their customers. We all choose our airlines to fly based on some collection of reasons and it clearly seems that between AA and US elites many of these reasons are different and why people do not like this merger. The only winners here are the shareholders, at least for the short term.
#27
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: PHL
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum, Hilton HHonors Diamond
Posts: 1,204
Yes, it is written genuinely. Political correctness aside, pmUS was a worse airline in terms of hard product, soft product, age of planes, connections, destinations, clubs and every other measurable factor. In fact, I would be hard pressed to think of a worse "major" airline in the United States than pmUS.
(
(
I get it that AA people are upset with the changes as all fliers should be IMO. US definitely did some stupid things (charging for drinks) over the years but I've had relatively good luck with them. Their longer distance flights in FC were pretty decent (PHL-PHX for example). For those who wanted non-stops from Philly, they weren't a bad choice. US was not a world-class airline, but certainly a real airline.
#28
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MSP/PIT
Programs: DL PM, AA EXP, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat
Posts: 98
My favorite AA employee equated this to the homecoming king being forced to dance with the ugliest girl in school.
#29
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, MR Gold, SPG Gold, Hertz PC
Posts: 202
I think newyorkgeorge touched on it best. The difference between the two groups are largely location, location, location. The largest clusters of AA EXP's are almost certainly near DFW, MIA, ORD and to a slightly lesser extent Los Angeles and New York. US CP are likely to live in the northeast corridor, CLT and PHX. Neither group, for the most part and in my opinion, picks their airline based on first class service. Price and schedule, followed by ease of upgrade.
I do enjoy flyertalk. The members have great stories and experiences, but they are definitely not a representative sample of all flyers, and not even of elite level flyers.
And for those who don't care for the use of the word elite, one of the definitions is "having the most status in a society", which clearly applies. It doesn't necessarily mean that status is worth a whole lot.
I do enjoy flyertalk. The members have great stories and experiences, but they are definitely not a representative sample of all flyers, and not even of elite level flyers.
And for those who don't care for the use of the word elite, one of the definitions is "having the most status in a society", which clearly applies. It doesn't necessarily mean that status is worth a whole lot.
#30
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Texas
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton Diamond, Hertz Five Star, Avis First
Posts: 902
....yes..yes.. a little tongue in cheek.. I admit.. after all.. what wrong did Shrek ever do to me..