Originally Posted by Fanjet
(Post 19561723)
No it's not. AA's livery is classic. Even coca-cola realized that sometimes it isn't better to change the look.
|
Originally Posted by teemuflyer
(Post 19562607)
As the article states, due to the composite makeup of the 787, the polished aluminium is not an option when those birds arrive, thus they need to come up with something new to maintain consistency of the brand.
|
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 19561495)
this is exciting!!
~Moderator |
Originally Posted by FightingIlliniUAL
(Post 19562628)
I don't think this is the case. There is an effort to rebrand as they exist BK.
In these days of Prius enthusiasm and if/then mental processes to be followed when discarding a candy wrapper, I'd argue this is definitely not the time to be throwing latex chemicals and thinners onto 600+ aircraft for the sake of rebranding; rather, it must be done for the new aircraft on order since polishing metal is not an option. |
Originally Posted by FightingIlliniUAL
(Post 19562628)
I don't think this is the case. There is an effort to rebrand as they exit BK.
|
Originally Posted by teemuflyer
(Post 19562769)
I agree that this is also part of the plan, but I was just stating that they couldn't maintain the polished aluminium as part of any rebranded livery due to the 787 composite components.
|
Originally Posted by Fanjet
(Post 19563656)
How does Aeroflot do it for their 332s?
|
Originally Posted by hillrider
(Post 19563707)
The paint looks completely different than the rest of the AA fleet:
|
Originally Posted by thomdis
(Post 19563732)
True. And that color seems to blend into the sky as well. Somewhat similar to the A300s. Grey is not the best color in terms of visibility.
|
Originally Posted by teemuflyer
(Post 19563783)
Hmmm, is that the reason MIL planes are painted gray? ;)
|
|
Originally Posted by dayone
(Post 19564558)
|
Originally Posted by Fanjet
(Post 19561723)
No it's not. AA's livery is classic. Even coca-cola realized that sometimes it isn't better to change the look.
The cool thing about the scissor eagle is that it can be dressed down (as when paired with the letters "AA" on the tail of airplanes) or dressed up (when just the eagle, without "AA", appears on things like premium cabin menus, interior panels, etc.) Although this whole livery change idea smacks of rearranging the deck chairs on Titanic. |
Originally Posted by Herb687
(Post 19565354)
Agree. AA would be stupid to ditch the scissor eagle logo. Minor tweaks like going from polished aluminum to paint, new typefaces or changing the striping could work but anyone who suggests ditching the scissor eagle is a fool (or a "branding consultant" hack out to make a quick buck).
The cool thing about the scissor eagle is that it can be dressed down (as when paired with the letters "AA" on the tail of airplanes) or dressed up (when just the eagle, without "AA", appears on things like premium cabin menus, interior panels, etc.) Although this whole livery change idea smacks of rearranging the deck chairs on Titanic. |
Originally Posted by Fanjet
(Post 19561723)
No it's not. AA's livery is classic. Even coca-cola realized that sometimes it isn't better to change the look.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:04 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.