Originally Posted by Dallas49er
(Post 19347682)
I will NOT book away from AA. There is something called loyalty up, and loyalty down.
OT-to any AA pilots who give a ....? I just have to shake my head. Where is there any advantage to shooting yourself in the (insert body part here)? Many of these pilots have served in the military, and at young ages were given responsibility for millions and millions of dollars of equipment, and given incalculable responsibility for completing their missions, sometimes at great personal risk. They worked as a team. And when they get out, and get hired by an airline, they are forced join a union. My question is: Is there some kind of initiation program that the union has, similar to a fraternity? Except that there is no hazing, paddling, over-indulging, secret handshakes, and chasing sorority girls. In a way you have answered your own question. They don't change at all. You just cant see things from their perspective because now it's YOU who are suffering some inconvenience. Instead, do they drink some kind of kool-aid that causes them to turn away from a life of responsibility, and creates an inability to think about long term consequences, and instead become robotic, petty, greedy, selfish, self-centered, small little people. So small, that they are so mad at AA management, any AA management, that they would rather get into bed with Doug Parker. Though pilots are loathe to inconvenience passengers they are not going to go out of their way to compensate for management's shortcomings anymore either. Because they don't place your interests in front of their own you term them "robotic, petty, greedy, selfish, self-centered, little people". I think your rant is quite revealing about what kind of person you are. Back on topic-I will not book away from AA. I WILL be more than happy to suggest a career change to any unhappy AA Captain working 75 hours a month. How about to Captain of a lawnmower for Jose's Lawn Service for 50+ hours a week in August in the DFW Metroplex. :D |
Originally Posted by hillrider
(Post 19344527)
When I made my OP on the thread that ended up bringing this to light, in order to get a sense whether something was broken with FlightStats I did browse DL and UA stats. And they didn't seem broken. Yesterday, for example, they cancelled 0.7% and arrived "ontime" 71% -- not great, but not broken (compare to AA's 3.3% and 46% and DL 0.2% and 67%).
My AA flight ex-JFK yesterday evening was delayed by about an hour due to WX. I'll take that over mechanical/crewing delays on nearly every UA flight I've flown since June (a measily 25k BIS) across both PMCO/PMUA equipment. |
Originally Posted by able
(Post 19348762)
Though pilots are loathe to inconvenience passengers they are not going to go out of their way to compensate for management's shortcomings anymore either.
|
Airline Deregulation - a mistake
|
Originally Posted by hbtr
(Post 19349001)
Look, I feel bad for how AA is dumping on all their employees. But I dont think you need to deliberately inconvenience customers to avoid compensating for management shortcomings. Frankly I lose all sympathy for workers when innocent people are impacted by actions like these.
|
Originally Posted by azepine00
(Post 19348447)
Nothing meaningful changed in ua program. There are plenty of merger related issues and spotty customer service but that seems to be improving...
I am a refugee from UA, and AA is a breath of fresh air. I agree with flygirl. I will not knuckle under to the union goons. I will stick with AA, and it is their far superior ff / elite program that keeps me on board. My AA TATL flight Monday arrived at LHR ahead of schedule. |
Originally Posted by hbtr
(Post 19349001)
Look, I feel bad for how AA is dumping on all their employees. But I dont think you need to deliberately inconvenience customers to avoid compensating for management shortcomings. Frankly I lose all sympathy for workers when innocent people are impacted by actions like these.
Or should we mandate all businesses being run superbly like Southwest was under Herb so nobody was ever interested in a strike, even though they had organized? |
Originally Posted by bernardd
(Post 19350356)
So what exactly are you suggesting? This group already has a LOT of restrictions on when and how it can take industrial action, which is part of the reason you're seeing this style of action.
Or should we mandate all businesses being run superbly like Southwest was under Herb so nobody was ever interested in a strike, even though they had organized? I guess some labor groups might be happy with this, but is the community best served by such actions? Like it or not the airline industry now is deregulated and market considerations are in force. All the legacies have declared bankruptcy (or gone out of business); perhaps Bob Crandall was right when he said the system is broke. |
Originally Posted by FlyerChrisK
(Post 19348787)
This is overlooking the entire summer of miserable UA operations. Wander over to the UA forum: Plenty of people are complaining over there.
My AA flight ex-JFK yesterday evening was delayed by about an hour due to WX. I'll take that over mechanical/crewing delays on nearly every UA flight I've flown since June (a measily 25k BIS) across both PMCO/PMUA equipment. |
Originally Posted by hazelrah
(Post 19350657)
I guess some labor groups might be happy with this, but is the community best served by such actions?
And I also wonder why we allow businesses to chose where they file for Chapter 11. Why isn't it automatically in the district where they're headquartered? It's not only the airline industry where "the common good" or "the interests of the community" turns out to be a self serving smokescreen. |
Originally Posted by bernardd
(Post 19350794)
Do we believe in a free market system or don't we? I have serious doubts about the motivation behind singling out railroad and airline employees for "special" treatment that creates such a long process before action is possible.
|
My fiancée and I are leaving on our honeymoon October 5th from ORD-CDG on an AA award ticket.
I'm contemplating cancelling the AA leg and moving to UA... what are the odds this goes on a few weeks and would impact a transat? I'm scared that in the event of a cancellation, rebooking on another airline is going to be tough or impossible on an award ticket... |
Originally Posted by nethead25
(Post 19351053)
My fiancée and I are leaving on our honeymoon October 5th from ORD-CDG on an AA award ticket.
I'm contemplating cancelling the AA leg and moving to UA... what are the odds this goes on a few weeks and would impact a transat? I'm scared that in the event of a cancellation, rebooking on another airline is going to be tough or impossible on an award ticket... |
Originally Posted by nethead25
(Post 19351053)
My fiancée and I are leaving on our honeymoon October 5th from ORD-CDG on an AA award ticket.
I'm contemplating cancelling the AA leg and moving to UA... what are the odds this goes on a few weeks and would impact a transat? I'm scared that in the event of a cancellation, rebooking on another airline is going to be tough or impossible on an award ticket... Facts: -About 5% or fewer flights are canceled every day on AA -It's rather random and no one knows which flights will be involved -If you have a connecting flight, you've doubled your chances of a delay or cancellation -You might have more problems if you have a tighter connection -Changes to tickets frequently involve change or cancellation fees -AA will be responsible for your rebooking regardless of type of ticket I don't know where you are flying from, but as an ATL based passenger, I'd probably stick with my AA ticket for now even if I had a connection in ORD. If the flight was substantially delayed or cancelled, I'd ask AA to put me on BA or DL. I'd make sure I had flight numbers and loads available. I'd also take advantage of my AAdmirals Club membership. |
Originally Posted by bernardd
(Post 19350356)
So what exactly are you suggesting? This group already has a LOT of restrictions on when and how it can take industrial action, which is part of the reason you're seeing this style of action.
Originally Posted by bernardd
(Post 19350794)
Do we believe in a free market system or don't we? I have serious doubts about the motivation behind singling out railroad and airline employees for "special" treatment that creates such a long process before action is possible.
Originally Posted by bernardd
(Post 19350794)
And I also wonder why we allow businesses to chose where they file for Chapter 11. Why isn't it automatically in the district where they're headquartered?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:38 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.