AA ceases flights [all activity?] in Belgium 06 Nov 2012!
#46
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,916
AA used to have their EU Affairs Office (Gov't Relations) in BRU with about a half dozen staff I believe -- they also had an in-town office - no idea if it was closed. I wonder if the EU staff - if they are still in fact based there are part of the 33 or over and above it.
#47
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Programs: UA Mileage Plus, AA Advantage
Posts: 5,983
I'd agree with that right there because the higher your fixed costs are the more revenue you need to cover your costs and obviously it didn't work out. With that being said I wouldn't be stunned if they are back in BRU in a few years.
#48
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US
Programs: UA GS 2MM
Posts: 1,740
This really is surprising. BRU, as the seat of so much governmental and associated work, always appeared to be one of the better-yielding cities in Europe from the US.
UA added ORD-BRU last year and even up-gauged EWR-BRU to a PMUA 777 (presumably to offer first class). IAD-BRU has been permanently (for what that word is worth) up-gauged to a three-class 777 as well.
DL is still double-daily from the US on wide-bodies and SN just opened BRU-JFK on the A330.
It baffles me that AA can't make it work.
UA added ORD-BRU last year and even up-gauged EWR-BRU to a PMUA 777 (presumably to offer first class). IAD-BRU has been permanently (for what that word is worth) up-gauged to a three-class 777 as well.
DL is still double-daily from the US on wide-bodies and SN just opened BRU-JFK on the A330.
It baffles me that AA can't make it work.
#49
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,916
This really is surprising. BRU, as the seat of so much governmental and associated work, always appeared to be one of the better-yielding cities in Europe from the US.
UA added ORD-BRU last year and even up-gauged EWR-BRU to a PMUA 777 (presumably to offer first class). IAD-BRU has been permanently (for what that word is worth) up-gauged to a three-class 777 as well.
DL is still double-daily from the US on wide-bodies and SN just opened BRU-JFK on the A330.
It baffles me that AA can't make it work.
UA added ORD-BRU last year and even up-gauged EWR-BRU to a PMUA 777 (presumably to offer first class). IAD-BRU has been permanently (for what that word is worth) up-gauged to a three-class 777 as well.
DL is still double-daily from the US on wide-bodies and SN just opened BRU-JFK on the A330.
It baffles me that AA can't make it work.
Also I think AA lost InBev/AB to *A around the time AA discontinued ORD-BRU (a natural connector from STL).
#50
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: AA, United, British Airways, Alaska Air
Posts: 250
This is horrible When I lived in France, I used to fly into BRU in order avoid CDG... I cannot believe they are stopping operations in Belgium!
#51
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,309
you clearly didnt read my post, #44
This really is surprising. BRU, as the seat of so much governmental and associated work, always appeared to be one of the better-yielding cities in Europe from the US.
UA added ORD-BRU last year and even up-gauged EWR-BRU to a PMUA 777 (presumably to offer first class). IAD-BRU has been permanently (for what that word is worth) up-gauged to a three-class 777 as well.
DL is still double-daily from the US on wide-bodies and SN just opened BRU-JFK on the A330.
It baffles me that AA can't make it work.
UA added ORD-BRU last year and even up-gauged EWR-BRU to a PMUA 777 (presumably to offer first class). IAD-BRU has been permanently (for what that word is worth) up-gauged to a three-class 777 as well.
DL is still double-daily from the US on wide-bodies and SN just opened BRU-JFK on the A330.
It baffles me that AA can't make it work.
#52
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
No need for you to have accepted UA -- you could have insisted on staying on One World -- connecting in LHR or MAD. But, now that you are on UA be sure to collect both from UA for the flight you are taking and AA for the flights that you were booked on, but involuntarily aren't taking.
#53
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
Good grief! I didn't know this. Haven't been to London in too long, but going shortly. How am I to get out of London? Guess I will have to go surface to Ireland or the continent. No way am I going to allow people to either x-ray or microwave me. I'd have no problem going textile free through screening, but to subject one's body to those waves is pointless.
#54
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CMH
Programs: AA EXP, EBS GLD, A|Club PLT, CC Silver, HH GLD
Posts: 782
I don't think this is the end of the world for BRU. My speculation is that part of the retraction is the more limited number of aircraft AA will have till it starts taking deliveries of some more newer planes.
If AA can junk additional high cost planes at the temporary cost of reducing some flight schedules it will only help them reduce their operating costs.
If AA can junk additional high cost planes at the temporary cost of reducing some flight schedules it will only help them reduce their operating costs.
#55
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: AA PLT, DL
Posts: 309
Darn. I currently have a reservation on hold for ATL-MIA-JFK-BRU-JFK-MIA-ATL for Oct 28 to Nov 8...am I screwed? This route is also part of my PLT challenge. The only other alternative I found is through MAD...should I request the change now or let AA take care of it? I don't want to drop below the 10K required for the challenge.
#56
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
Darn. I currently have a reservation on hold for ATL-MIA-JFK-BRU-JFK-MIA-ATL for Oct 28 to Nov 8...am I screwed? This route is also part of my PLT challenge. The only other alternative I found is through MAD...should I request the change now or let AA take care of it? I don't want to drop below the 10K required for the challenge.