What does the all Q400 fleet mean for PDX-SFO
#76
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: (PHL) Cape May, NJ
Programs: MVP Gold 75K, Board Room, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 2,439
#79
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVPG
Posts: 609
Double miles PDX-Bay Area
It's official: http://www.alaskaair.com/www2/Promo/...asp?pid=AS0904
The separate announcement page says
It doesn't mention the Q400 or when it might switch over. But "initial" is an ominous word.
The separate announcement page says
The initial schedule for all of these flights will be operated with Horizon's 70-seat CRJ—700 regional jets.
#81
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,439
BOI-SJC on a Q400, 523 miles: 1h 59m
PDX-SFO on a 737, 550 miles: 1h 54m (AS), 1 h 45m (WN) (actually, PDX-OAK, WN doesn't fly PDX-SFO)
Why is this "ominous"? Q400s are pretty reasonable options for a 500-600 mile flight- a touch slower than a 737, but it's not really a huge deal, and if the tradeoff is having an extra frequency or two...
The tricky part is going to be PDX-SoCal without an RJ, once QX gets to that point... though I might note that WN doesn't have any direct PDX-BUR service (you'll be stopping in OAK, RNO, SMF or SJC first), and ONT is looking less and less tenable as airlines flee it.
PDX-SFO on a 737, 550 miles: 1h 54m (AS), 1 h 45m (WN) (actually, PDX-OAK, WN doesn't fly PDX-SFO)
Why is this "ominous"? Q400s are pretty reasonable options for a 500-600 mile flight- a touch slower than a 737, but it's not really a huge deal, and if the tradeoff is having an extra frequency or two...
The tricky part is going to be PDX-SoCal without an RJ, once QX gets to that point... though I might note that WN doesn't have any direct PDX-BUR service (you'll be stopping in OAK, RNO, SMF or SJC first), and ONT is looking less and less tenable as airlines flee it.
#82
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,439
This page, actually: http://www.alaskaair.com/as/www2/pro...ent-change.asp
#84
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada (YYJ)
Posts: 142
EDIT: The return today (QX2520) was 1hr 19min in the air and 1hr 33min gate to gate.
#85
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YOW (mostly); PDX (some of the time)
Programs: AS (former)MVP, DL [NW-WP], AC Aeroplan, Starbucks Gold :)
Posts: 257
It's official: http://www.alaskaair.com/www2/Promo/...asp?pid=AS0904
The separate announcement page says It doesn't mention the Q400 or when it might switch over. But "initial" is an ominous word.
The separate announcement page says It doesn't mention the Q400 or when it might switch over. But "initial" is an ominous word.
(current), [future]
PDX - LAX: (4 AS/ 2 QX), [ 3 AS / 2 QX]
PDX - LGB: (2 AS/ 0 QX), [ 1 AS / 1 QX] (B6 trades one E90 for a A320 for summer)
I do hope that AS can reinstate some lost frequencies to PDX when the economy gets better.
~FAI PDX Flyer
#86
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVPG
Posts: 609
Yikes! It's going to get awfully crowded in the A terminal this summer. And empty in the C terminal.
I wonder if they would consider letting QX utilize some of the C gates to relieve the crowding in the A terminal.
I wonder if they would consider letting QX utilize some of the C gates to relieve the crowding in the A terminal.
#87
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, Or USA
Posts: 1,801
In addition, KVS shows SoCal downgrades as well for PDX, choosing 15 June as a base [future] date:
(current), [future]
PDX - LAX: (4 AS/ 2 QX), [ 3 AS / 2 QX]
PDX - LGB: (2 AS/ 0 QX), [ 1 AS / 1 QX] (B6 trades one E90 for a A320 for summer)
I do hope that AS can reinstate some lost frequencies to PDX when the economy gets better.
~FAI PDX Flyer
(current), [future]
PDX - LAX: (4 AS/ 2 QX), [ 3 AS / 2 QX]
PDX - LGB: (2 AS/ 0 QX), [ 1 AS / 1 QX] (B6 trades one E90 for a A320 for summer)
I do hope that AS can reinstate some lost frequencies to PDX when the economy gets better.
~FAI PDX Flyer