Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

Why Doesn't AS Have Lie-Flat Seats on Transcons?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why Doesn't AS Have Lie-Flat Seats on Transcons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2019, 9:17 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: UA GS>1K>Nothing; DL DM 2MM; AS 75K>Nothing>MVP
Posts: 9,341
Why Doesn't AS Have Lie-Flat Seats on Transcons?

Really? Big disincentive to fly AS!
5khours is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2019, 9:55 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SEA
Programs: AS 100K, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 876
They've made it crystal clear their intention is not to target earning revenue in FC as a strategy. Rather they see FC and upgrades as a retention strategy. Yes it sucks, but thats their approach.
rune87 is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2019, 10:04 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
This is why I only fly private!

Oh, wait...
NoLaGent is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2019, 10:36 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,329
No need to rehash this. Feel free to read through these closed threads:

[Rant] AS First Class Is a Bad Joke

Mea culpa: I just paid full F fare for JFK-SFO on Alaska
RAD_PDX is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 12:37 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
Oooooo. This again!
Yoshi212, jinglish and spamman808 like this.
tusphotog is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 1:11 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
Originally Posted by rune87
They've made it crystal clear their intention is not to target earning revenue in FC as a strategy. Rather they see FC and upgrades as a retention strategy. Yes it sucks, but thats their approach.
Really? They don't upgrade much in advance anymore.

I thought it was just because they decided it isn't worth upgrading, and they still get some suckers who pay for first trans-con
s0ssos is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 2:08 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: AS MVPG
Posts: 2,206
Originally Posted by rune87
They've made it crystal clear their intention is not to target earning revenue in FC as a strategy. Rather they see FC and upgrades as a retention strategy. Yes it sucks, but thats their approach.
Considering how are are upgrades are on Transcons flights, they clearly are selling F. Why not everyone will shell out extra bucks for lie flats is probably due to many people just not seeing the extra cost is worth it over a perfectly comfortable seat.

Alaska has a monopoly on some non-stop routes for their F product. Though I think United is now flying premium economy, similar to Alaska F, on some of their lie-flat routes.
alphaeagle is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 2:21 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ANC
Programs: AS MVP, Club 49, Global Entry, National Emerald Club, Hilton Silver
Posts: 1,400
It's not their style. And who needs to lay down on a transcon?
Nevsky and Bellerina like this.
AKLifetimeFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 2:50 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: UA GS>1K>Nothing; DL DM 2MM; AS 75K>Nothing>MVP
Posts: 9,341
Originally Posted by AKLifetimeFlyer
It's not their style. And who needs to lay down on a transcon?
Me.
UAPremierExec likes this.
5khours is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 4:18 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75k, Hyatt Globalist, National Executive Elite
Posts: 272
Originally Posted by 5khours
Me.
Then fly B6!
eddiehuang97 is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 8:30 am
  #11  
formerly Sleepy_Sentry
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 614
I can think of a number of reasons:
  1. Interoperability-- With its current setup AS can easily swap aircraft between short and long flights
  2. Monopoly on certain routes
  3. Competition's offerings-- United and AA rarely offer lie flat out of SEA or PDX

Last edited by danielflyer; Oct 18, 2019 at 10:05 am
danielflyer is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 8:40 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BOS/ORH
Programs: AS 75K
Posts: 18,323
Yawn
CDKing is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 8:59 am
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
No market in the AS demographic. You could ask the same thing about the AS lounge and the AS food in F.

Bear in mind that while AA, DL, UA and B6, all offer a premium TCON product with lie flat seating, even that is limited to certain routes which are HVC-heavy. AS, after all, did not bump its F product up when it acquired VX.
Often1 is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 9:41 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,392
Originally Posted by 5khours
Really? Big disincentive to fly AS!
Next up in new and novel FT topics: Why doesn’t WN have first class and assigned seating? Big disincentive to fly WN.

Followed by: why don’t airlines ban kids in first class?
eponymous_coward is online now  
Old Oct 18, 2019, 10:10 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
Next up in new and novel FT topics: Why doesn’t WN have first class and assigned seating? Big disincentive to fly WN.

Followed by: why don’t airlines ban kids in first class?
That is a tough one! So many, decades past the age of Majority, still act like them....

James
Flying for Fun is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.