Community
Wiki Posts
Search

QX cutting flights due to pilot shortage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2017, 8:27 am
  #331  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
You know I get it, AS/QX messed up by not offering competitive pay and lost a bunch of pilots without replacing them. They have fixed that (kind of although if you watch the pilot forum it leaves you wondering), but it will take a year probably to get back to where they were. In the meantime I wish they would just reduce the schedule to one they can actually operate and I will figure out what to do with my booking. A realistically reduced schedule is way better than these constant cancellations!
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 8:35 am
  #332  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Originally Posted by jsguyrus
In the meantime I wish they would just reduce the schedule to one they can actually operate and I will figure out what to do with my booking. A realistically reduced schedule is way better than these constant cancellations!
That's not as black-and-white as you want it to be.

What level of pilot staffing is enough? Enough to cover a big weather event? Enough to cover the schedule if pilots don't pick up extra trips at a typical rate? Do you want to staff & schedule for a 100.0% completion rate? The questions of crew and fleet utilization are key to profitability.

If you want to argue that ALK execs misjudged attrition and trip pick ups as they slow-rolled wage increases for Horizon pilots I wouldn't disagree, but hindsight is 20/20.
3Cforme is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 8:44 am
  #333  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,643
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
T
What level of pilot staffing is enough? Enough to cover a big weather event? Enough to cover the schedule if pilots don't pick up extra trips at a typical rate? Do you want to staff & schedule for a 100.0% completion rate? The questions of crew and fleet utilization are key to profitability.
I think most of us would say that we shouldn't be able to materially tell the difference between AS ops and QX ops when it comes to on time and completion. So, the default ought to be to staff QX to a similar standard as AS mainline. AS mainline melts down when SEA/PDX get snow, I guess we could all tolerate the same from QX. The problem is that QX has been on a slow burn that has recently had a nice dose of propellant thrown on it.
PV_Premier is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 8:46 am
  #334  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,643
Originally Posted by ucdtim17
Weird update. PDX-OAK and PDX-SMF are 2x 737 Dec 1-14 but at their default 3/4x Q400 before and after.
AS can't run with WN for O/D traffic if they are only going to give SMF 2x nonstop a day to PDX and at relatively crummy times at that. Quite a sad state of affairs this has become if that is expected to be the new reality. I am hoping that this is just happening during this period as it's one of the lowest travel periods of the year and AS is just trying to "CYA" and free up the Q400s for other core routes where they can't get away with the lower frequency even during the lull between Thanksgiving and XMas.

Last edited by PV_Premier; Sep 25, 2017 at 9:18 am
PV_Premier is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 8:46 am
  #335  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
That's not as black-and-white as you want it to be.

What level of pilot staffing is enough? Enough to cover a big weather event? Enough to cover the schedule if pilots don't pick up extra trips at a typical rate? Do you want to staff & schedule for a 100.0% completion rate? The questions of crew and fleet utilization are key to profitability.

If you want to argue that ALK execs misjudged attrition and trip pick ups as they slow-rolled wage increases for Horizon pilots I wouldn't disagree, but hindsight is 20/20.
I'm sure its not that simple and my background is not airline operations or scheduling, that said this should be something that professional airline managers are capable of doing.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 8:51 am
  #336  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,485
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
That's not as black-and-white as you want it to be.

What level of pilot staffing is enough? Enough to cover a big weather event? Enough to cover the schedule if pilots don't pick up extra trips at a typical rate? Do you want to staff & schedule for a 100.0% completion rate? The questions of crew and fleet utilization are key to profitability.

If you want to argue that ALK execs misjudged attrition and trip pick ups as they slow-rolled wage increases for Horizon pilots I wouldn't disagree, but hindsight is 20/20.
ALK is a very frugal airline group and that has helped them achieve a really great margin the last few quarters.

Now they have squeezed QX too much and feeling the effect of their past decision.

Pilots are finally now in a position of power and unless there is a downturn, QX simply don't have enough pilots and it's not getting better for a while.

A bigger issue is what happens with the mainline pilot. They are in arbitration and both AS and VX pilots have been paid significantly lower than legacies. At some point if arbitration doesn't work out, mainline pilot would be able to strike. Or they could obviously just give a much deserved pay raise to the pilots. Jetblue, Spirit and Frontier are all facing the same issue now. They just haven't boiled over like QX.
tphuang is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 9:40 am
  #337  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
Earlier this month I was on a delayed mainline flight and got an unrequested $75 as an apology for the airplane breaking and having a two hour delay.

FWIW, now that I’m qualified for 75K again, I’m booking nonstop mainline AS, AA & WN flights the rest of the year. If I can get an AS flight through LAX or SAN, I’ll do that, but I’m staying off QX as much as possible.
tusphotog is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 10:06 am
  #338  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
Originally Posted by PV_Premier
AS can't run with WN for O/D traffic if they are only going to give SMF 2x nonstop a day to PDX and at relatively crummy times at that. Quite a sad state of affairs this has become if that is expected to be the new reality. I am hoping that this is just happening during this period as it's one of the lowest travel periods of the year and AS is just trying to "CYA" and free up the Q400s for other core routes where they can't get away with the lower frequency even during the lull between Thanksgiving and XMas.
The AM PDX-OAK and PM returns are the flights that I'm on so 2x 737 at those times is fine with me. It's a relatively meager offering compared to WN though (but that's also the case today).

The insistence on keeping these routes Q400 is bizarre and disappointing. The timing of the QX staffing woes lined up exactly with the timing of AS wanting to make a big splash in CA. One of the easiest things to do would be shift these long Q400 routes to other aircraft to free the crews up to cover other shorter routes. They could have issued press releases with the airports hyping the service improvement. Instead we get this haphazard month by month schedule tweaking and no way to know more than a month in advance if a flight will actually be flown as scheduled.
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 10:25 am
  #339  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: BUR/LAX
Programs: AS MVP
Posts: 300
Originally Posted by ucdtim17
The insistence on keeping these routes Q400 is bizarre and disappointing. The timing of the QX staffing woes lined up exactly with the timing of AS wanting to make a big splash in CA. One of the easiest things to do would be shift these long Q400 routes to other aircraft to free the crews up to cover other shorter routes.
But, generally, they're using the E175s to do flying that Q400s can't do. I'm personally surprised we're not seeing Q400s on SJC-BUR, but the E175s are being rotated through that route on PDX-BUR and SJC-PDX, both of which would also be "long" Q400 routes.
northwesterner is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 10:36 am
  #340  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
Originally Posted by northwesterner
But, generally, they're using the E175s to do flying that Q400s can't do. I'm personally surprised we're not seeing Q400s on SJC-BUR, but the E175s are being rotated through that route on PDX-BUR and SJC-PDX, both of which would also be "long" Q400 routes.
They've put the E175s on new, shorter intra-CA routes because they want to offer a competitive product against WN. For whatever reasons they don't have interest in attempting to compete on PDX-OAK/SMF in a similar way. PDX-OAK was 6x mainline before the recession in '08; it ultimately dropped to 3x Q400 and despite the recession ending long ago, and AS wanting to expand service in CA now, they still don't want to budge it from 3x Q400.
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 10:44 am
  #341  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,643
Originally Posted by ucdtim17
They've put the E175s on new, shorter intra-CA routes because they want to offer a competitive product against WN.
Follow the money. There is more money at stake in the south bay and SFO than SMF and the east bay, or so AS thinks. And honestly, they're probably right.
PV_Premier is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 10:54 am
  #342  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: PDX
Programs: DL Gold
Posts: 282
Never thought I'd be happy to see my flight rescheduled onto a CRJ2.
makfan likes this.
Asquared1 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 11:03 am
  #343  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
Originally Posted by PV_Premier
Follow the money. There is more money at stake in the south bay and SFO than SMF and the east bay, or so AS thinks. And honestly, they're probably right.
It's not surprising their primary focus is SFO and SJC. It is surprising to me they seem to be going out of their way to not improve service at OAK though by continuing to insist on keeping it on the Q400 rolls and therefore making the QX staffing problems that much more difficult to cover.
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 11:19 am
  #344  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Keep in mind that QX only has around 8-9 E175's and has deferred delivery of aircraft as they don't have enough pilots to fly them. With that small number their jet routes are not fully built out so they are super inefficient route wise.

Now we are seeing a majority of PDX-SEA shuttle flights operated by Sky West with CRJ7 and CRJ2's.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2017, 11:48 am
  #345  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,391
I sat next to an AS pilot on the way back from SJC (two actually, but the other pilot was pretty quiet). He not only was talking about why there's a "loop" when taking off from SJC (I correctly guessed it's to keep from interfering with SFO), but offered his opinion on this: "totally foreseeable when you're not paying regional pilots enough, it's surprising that Dave Campbell (Horizon CEO) hasn't been fired yet."

My QX flight that morning (RNO-SJC) was on time, even with some de-icing.
eponymous_coward is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.