![]() |
Checked Baggage Changes - No Interlining on Separate Tickets or Split PNRs
Now on the AS website:
DOT Enhanced Passenger Protection policy rules have changed the way baggage fees are charged when travel involves more than one airline. Learn more about these changes. When your travel involves multiple airlines on one ticket (including flights marketed by one airline and flown by another), please refer to your travel confirmation to determine which airline's baggage policy applies. When Alaska Airlines baggage policy applies, the following rules and fees are in effect: Effective January 15, 2013: Baggage will only be checked to a stopover point or destination on a single ticket itinerary. Alaska Airlines will no longer check bags through to destinations purchased on a separate ticket. Passengers using multiple tickets to reach their final destination should allow enough time to claim all checked baggage at Alaska Airlines, recheck it with the connecting airline, and pay that airline's applicable baggage fees. Exception: Alaska Airlines will check bags, without additional fees, to another Alaska Airlines operated flight on a separate ticket, provided the applicable maximum layover time is not exceeded. Each checked bag must weigh 50 pounds or less and have a maximum dimension of 62 linear inches (length + height + width) to avoid additional charges. The Bolding is mine. What once was a simple dropoff of bags and stay air side throughout the journey now becomes: 1. Leave security 2. Collect bags 3. Line up at another check in counter 4. Check bags 5. Potentially pay another baggae fee 6. Clear security and board the next flight Am I missing something here or has DOT & the airlines suddenly lost their collective senses and plan to plug up baggage claims, check in counters and security lanes...or is this just another excuse to collect more fees? |
Originally Posted by BOB W
(Post 19790507)
just another excuse to collect more fees?
I suppose though on the flip side if you are booked on AS ticket stock and on the return a partner airline wants to sock you with bag fees they can no longer do so as I understand it. Although now that DL and AA are offering elites free bags I no longer see how at least for AS how this will matter |
How often do you actually have tickets purchased on separate PNRs?
|
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
(Post 19790609)
How often do you actually have tickets purchased on separate PNRs?
|
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
(Post 19790609)
How often do you actually have tickets purchased on separate PNRs?
|
so essentially interline baggage agreements are extinct? unless its a booked one PNR partner ticket? Definately a money grab. The airlines get more money and the feds do on the tax the airline pays for the revenue so its a big win for big government plus then big government will be able to justify hiring more TSA people to handle the extra bags to made big government even larger
|
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's PWP wondrousdevice3.0: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)
Much international travel will be :rolleyes: DL and others have similar action... Add cxns in ANC to outlying villages... |
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 19790704)
Add cxns in ANC to outlying villages...
|
I think this is a major, major South Of Expected move by AS. I'm so sad to see the black hole my former airline of choice is continuing to get sucked into. :(
|
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's PWP wondrousdevice3.0: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)
Originally Posted by jackal
I think this is a major, major South Of Expected move by AS. I'm so sad to see the black hole my former airline of choice is continuing to get sucked into. :(
|
Originally Posted by ANC
(Post 19790715)
wonder if theres some type of an exemption for that stuff. At least for most of those flights you dont have to deal with TSA security so its not a huge deal
|
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 19790730)
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's PWP wondrousdevice3.0: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)
I'm not sure AS has much of a choice with the DOT regs on the issue...seems most other carriers have made the switch or are about to. |
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 19790730)
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's PWP wondrousdevice3.0: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)
I'm not sure AS has much of a choice with the DOT regs on the issue...seems most other carriers have made the switch or are about to. |
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's PWP wondrousdevice3.0: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)
Originally Posted by ANC
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 19790704)
Add cxns in ANC to outlying villages...
|
Originally Posted by dave1013
(Post 19790734)
I bet some well-written letters to a congressman and two senators might make a difference.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:40 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.