Sam Chui on JFK-AKL Inaugural
#17
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: Chase and American Express
Posts: 260
So definitely not as bad as I initially thought. My longest flight was jfk to guangzhou on china southern business which was 16.5 hours so 18 hours is definitely doable. Easily knocked out 12 hours of that flight just sleeping.
#18
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: NZ *E
Posts: 346
No I have not had the misfortune in flying in that seat haha. Never seen pop out screens on planes. I watched the youtube clip again and i can see what you are talking about. First time through i thought it was peoples own laptops/ipads they were watching. Don't know how i missed that.
Ok when he said no in between I understood it as no recline, just upright stiff sitting.
So definitely not as bad as I initially thought. My longest flight was jfk to guangzhou on china southern business which was 16.5 hours so 18 hours is definitely doable. Easily knocked out 12 hours of that flight just sleeping.
Ok when he said no in between I understood it as no recline, just upright stiff sitting.
So definitely not as bad as I initially thought. My longest flight was jfk to guangzhou on china southern business which was 16.5 hours so 18 hours is definitely doable. Easily knocked out 12 hours of that flight just sleeping.
#19
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,118
The fact you're so highly critical and judgemental of something you've never flown in says a lot. Despite the age of this seat design it still delivers one of the best sleeps of any lie flat seat in the sky, and that's the key thing most people want for a long duration night flight.
.
.
Last edited by sbiddle; Sep 25, 2022 at 11:39 pm
#20
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Auckland
Programs: NZ Elite, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 908
The fact you're so highly critical and judgemental of something you've never flown in says a lot. Despite the age of this seat design it still delivers one of the best sleeps of any lie flat seat in the sky, and that's the key thing most people want for a long duration night flight.
I've had the privilege of flying many other airlines in F/J and Air NZ beats most. These are the only ones which have beaten NZ when it comes to sleep:
- LH 747-400 F (with the separate bed)
- SQ new 380 suite
- EH 380 apartment
#21
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Programs: NZ*GE / EK*GOLD
Posts: 2,510
The fact you're so highly critical and judgemental of something you've never flown in says a lot. Despite the age of this seat design it still delivers one of the best sleeps of any lie flat seat in the sky, and that's the key thing most people want for a long duration night flight.
#22
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: Chase and American Express
Posts: 260
The fact you're so highly critical and judgemental of something you've never flown in says a lot. Despite the age of this seat design it still delivers one of the best sleeps of any lie flat seat in the sky, and that's the key thing most people want for a long duration night flight.
#23
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,118
What's interesting is that US passengers seem to really love the dine together option which is something most other airlines don't have. There are plenty of reasons why people will quite happily pay money to fly on Air NZ
#24
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Auckland NZ
Programs: NZ Gold Elite, AS, AC, QF
Posts: 748
I have to agree. Still haven't had anywhere near the same quality of sleep in other airlines's J (Austrian was a close second) hard product. Even with the coffin-like shoulder width, the mattress makes a massive difference.
The fact you're so highly critical and judgemental of something you've never flown in says a lot. Despite the age of this seat design it still delivers one of the best sleeps of any lie flat seat in the sky, and that's the key thing most people want for a long duration night flight.
.
.
#25
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Frensham, Lincolnshire
Programs: RFC
Posts: 5,093
#26
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Auckland
Programs: NZ Elite, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 908
Off the top of my head, I've flown the following in the years leading up to Covid:
- EK F (both 'standard' and 'game changer')
- EY F & apartments
- SQ new and old 380 suites
- SQ new & old 777 F/J
- SQ longhaul J 350
- BA F/J
- LH F 380/747-8/747-400
- CX F/J
- UA J (Polaris)
- QF J
- MH F/J
- TG F
- NH J
- JL F/J
- VS J
- LX F
- TP J
Now, when it comes to general lounging, privacy, F&B, service etc, many of the above well and truly beat NZ BP. However, on an overnight flight where NZ is an option I will generally pick them over another "better" carrier.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WLG/BKK
Programs: TG*G, NZ*GE, QF G, Accor Gold
Posts: 10,205
At the and of the day ‘best for sleep’ is a subjective, personal assessment. I like the NZ seat for sleep, but I prefer other seats for day long haul. Then add in other factors such as service level and consistency, ff program, schedule ‘density’, competition, and price - and you have many dimensions for individual preference.
The fact people are prepared to pay (dearly IMHO) for AirNZ’s BP isn’t necessarily a reflection of a preference for the ‘sleep comfort’ of the BP seat. It might be, it might not. A comprehensive survey would be required of those that flew AirNZ BP, additionally it’d be interesting to also survey those that made other choices than AirNZ (for biz travel)..
The fact people are prepared to pay (dearly IMHO) for AirNZ’s BP isn’t necessarily a reflection of a preference for the ‘sleep comfort’ of the BP seat. It might be, it might not. A comprehensive survey would be required of those that flew AirNZ BP, additionally it’d be interesting to also survey those that made other choices than AirNZ (for biz travel)..
#29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: NZ *E
Posts: 346
For me personally, I struggle with the length of the BP seat -- at 6'1" I do get a better sleep in Polaris since my feet don't touch the end of the seat (vs being squashed into the ottoman on NZ)
As i write this I see One Mile At A Time just came out with a review:
https://onemileatatime.com/insights/air-new-zealand-787-business-class/
As i write this I see One Mile At A Time just came out with a review:
https://onemileatatime.com/insights/air-new-zealand-787-business-class/
#30
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand (most of the time)
Programs: Air NZ Elite *G, Honors Gold, IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 6,118
Talk about a review full of negativity - with many of the negative points simply not being true.
Trouble getting out of the seat while the tray table is in use? I've never seen that before on any flight. You simply push the tray table forward and there is plenty of space.
No way to know that you'll have WiFi before a flight? Umm the plane is known at least 48-72 hours out at the latest and Wi-Fi will show in the app if available.
Every single one of us here knows the product is dated but if Lucky hates travel that much maybe he should find a different day job.
I did notice in the comments another person commenting on how great the news is for sleeping..
Trouble getting out of the seat while the tray table is in use? I've never seen that before on any flight. You simply push the tray table forward and there is plenty of space.
No way to know that you'll have WiFi before a flight? Umm the plane is known at least 48-72 hours out at the latest and Wi-Fi will show in the app if available.
Every single one of us here knows the product is dated but if Lucky hates travel that much maybe he should find a different day job.
I did notice in the comments another person commenting on how great the news is for sleeping..