Air France, Paris to Vancouver
#16
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott/SPG/Hilton Gold, PreCheck + Clear
Posts: 2,306
There are no mitigating circumstances here. The airline were guilty of poor communication, poor organisation in getting delayed passengers to the right gate on time and a general lack of care. Its pretty obvious they resold my wifes seat to Vancouver when it became known the feeder flight was running late. Now its going to cost them approximately what my wife paid for the flight in compensation.
Also, this might be better situated in the AF forum, as it's not really a trip report.
#18
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: AC 50K, NZ Gold
Posts: 222
Thanks for that !!
Both my wife and I are well travelled and I am an avid 'Airline Watcher'. In all our travels, this is only the second time we have used Air France. Maybe the experiences on our favourite airline, Etihad, lulled us into thinking all full service airlines did the little things well, like getting us to our connecting fight. Obviously this is not the case. Not checking the manifest for tight connecting time passengers is pure negligence in my opinion. Not saying every one will make their flight, but if the crew at least show some interest in getting you there,it sticks in the memory bank.
Its probably just as well I was not on this particular trip, as I have a short fuse when it comes to dealing with airline jobsworths.
Both my wife and I are well travelled and I am an avid 'Airline Watcher'. In all our travels, this is only the second time we have used Air France. Maybe the experiences on our favourite airline, Etihad, lulled us into thinking all full service airlines did the little things well, like getting us to our connecting fight. Obviously this is not the case. Not checking the manifest for tight connecting time passengers is pure negligence in my opinion. Not saying every one will make their flight, but if the crew at least show some interest in getting you there,it sticks in the memory bank.
Its probably just as well I was not on this particular trip, as I have a short fuse when it comes to dealing with airline jobsworths.
#19
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The ticket was bought on the AF website. The Mimimum Connection Time for Flights arriving into and departing from Terminal 2E (as in this case) is 60 mins. (the easyCDG website is the source of that)
As the Vancouver flight only commenced on March 29th, maybe they haven't got things fine tuned yet, connection wise.
They were happy to allow the ticket sale and had ample time to inform us of any connection problems. They did not
As the Vancouver flight only commenced on March 29th, maybe they haven't got things fine tuned yet, connection wise.
They were happy to allow the ticket sale and had ample time to inform us of any connection problems. They did not
I am a strong advocate for short MCT's because they allow me to have a shot at connections when my schedule is tight on both ends. But, I understand the risks. I know that I will be rebooked, but understand that there may be real inconvenience.
As a TA, surely your wife knew this?
As to EC 261/2004, the headwinds issue will likely obviate any claim for the delay. Fighting that one off will be hard.
#20
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Falmouth, NS
Programs: AC APE, AA
Posts: 235
[
As to EC 261/2004, the headwinds issue will likely obviate any claim for the delay. Fighting that one off will be hard.[/QUOTE]
One hour + late on a 489 mile flight due to headwinds!! A bit of stretch, I think if AF tries that as an excuse.
As to EC 261/2004, the headwinds issue will likely obviate any claim for the delay. Fighting that one off will be hard.[/QUOTE]
One hour + late on a 489 mile flight due to headwinds!! A bit of stretch, I think if AF tries that as an excuse.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Platinum for life/Club2000 Ultimate, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 21,988
Your wife's story is rather unfortunate, but what I will write hereafter is from a "neutral" person (I mean who was not part of the concerned party) and so will try to give you my perception of your problem. Could AF have done it better ? Yes, for sure. Lack of food voucher is indeed abnormal. But, overall, this is just a missed tight connection which happen thousands and thousands of time on any airline every day. And AF has taken care of rebooking her on the next available routing. Lack of apparent caring is also disappointing but it's a question of perception by the affected person.
After a 5 hour Air Canada flight, she eventually landed in Vancouver at 2210, instead of 1150 as per original itinerary, a delay of`10 hours and 20 minutes.
Luckily, (or maybe not) she is flying KLM home via Amsterdam, and we look forward to filling in the Delayed Flight Compensation forms, which Air France will o doubt dispute/refuse to pay.
Luckily, (or maybe not) she is flying KLM home via Amsterdam, and we look forward to filling in the Delayed Flight Compensation forms, which Air France will o doubt dispute/refuse to pay.
The ticket was bought on the AF website. The Mimimum Connection Time for Flights arriving into and departing from Terminal 2E (as in this case) is 60 mins. (the easyCDG website is the source of that)
They were happy to allow the ticket sale and had ample time to inform us of any connection problems. They did not
They were happy to allow the ticket sale and had ample time to inform us of any connection problems. They did not
Homeland is 100% right and I strongly disagree with some senior members of this forum that feel differently. Air France could meet his wife right at the arrival gate and transfer the lady directly to Vancouver departure gate. How? By car Watsons, by car! Lufthansa can do it in Frankfurt when Vancouver feeders are delayed. They have driver with the passenger(s) name(s) and the boarder/custom officer in the car on duty. Simple and effective! Lets don't exercise false sense of understanding for negligent practices! Please and THANK YOU!!!
Last edited by Goldorak; Apr 6, 2015 at 3:56 am
#22
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
I hear you! I have a short fuse too when it comes to these things. France (Paris) is a great destination...well, probably except accordion music but even at its best CDG can be admired by architecture aficionados rather than transferring passengers. I have been avoiding AF/CDG since they have lost my luggage 10 years ago. Feb 17th. this year I tried them again and it took me over 2 hours to change the terminals. Never again! It was my own stupidity though, I was curious to try new business class configuration on Air Canada 777. Also a fail!
#23
#24
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
I hear you! I have a short fuse too when it comes to these things. France (Paris) is a great destination...well, probably except accordion music but even at its best CDG can be admired by architecture aficionados rather than transferring passengers. I have been avoiding AF/CDG since they have lost my luggage 10 years ago. Feb 17th. this year I tried them again and it took me over 2 hours to change the terminals. Never again! It was my own stupidity though, I was curious to try new business class configuration on Air Canada 777. Also a fail!
#25
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Paris, France
Programs: Flying Blue (LTPE) All (Gold)
Posts: 1,519
MCT between two international flights on AF in CDG TE is 90 minutes, not 60, (included domestic to domestic)
Minimum Connection Time [MCT]: CDG/AF-AF]
DD DI ID II
TERMINAL:
2E TO 2E 090 090 090 090
[DD] Domestic To Domestic
[DI] Domestic To Intl
[ID] Intl To Domestic
[II] Intl To Intl
Minimum Connection Time [MCT]: CDG/AF-AF]
DD DI ID II
TERMINAL:
2E TO 2E 090 090 090 090
[DD] Domestic To Domestic
[DI] Domestic To Intl
[ID] Intl To Domestic
[II] Intl To Intl
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Platinum for life/Club2000 Ultimate, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 21,988
MCT between two international flights on AF in CDG TE is 90 minutes, not 60, (included domestic to domestic)
Minimum Connection Time [MCT]: CDG/AF-AF]
DD DI ID II
TERMINAL:
2E TO 2E 090 090 090 090
[DD] Domestic To Domestic
[DI] Domestic To Intl
[ID] Intl To Domestic
[II] Intl To Intl
Minimum Connection Time [MCT]: CDG/AF-AF]
DD DI ID II
TERMINAL:
2E TO 2E 090 090 090 090
[DD] Domestic To Domestic
[DI] Domestic To Intl
[ID] Intl To Domestic
[II] Intl To Intl
BTW : no domestic to domestic at 2E
#27
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Paris, France
Programs: Flying Blue (LTPE) All (Gold)
Posts: 1,519
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Platinum for life/Club2000 Ultimate, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 21,988
Thanks guys but I don't think 90 min is correct for intra-2E. I'm trying to find information from other sources but I'm not successful at the moment.
#30
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Paris, France
Programs: Flying Blue (LTPE) All (Gold)
Posts: 1,519
I asked on KVS forum the source of this detailed information
Another question is , what about (if) registered luggage from DUB to YVR ... and passenger not in the second flight? This post is strange