Community
Wiki Posts
Search

I Class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 1:50 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Citizen of Canada, Member of the World!
Programs: AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AG... you get the picture
Posts: 2,091
Gaz, your point is about as succinct as it gets... I can't think of anyone who wouldn't prefer to hold an upgrade in advance over gate lottery.
Fermat is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 2:20 pm
  #32  
Original Poster
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
[QUOTE=Fermat]
and your vague generalization about "many many people" upgrading "on most every flt" isn't dumb?
No because many many people do get advance upgrades and many many more get them at the gate...but I think the general terms of upgrades are "space available" and sometimes that's not known until flt time.

You miss my point - if AC doesn't want to allow their passengers to confirm an upgrade in advance, why issue upgrade certificates at all? They have passenger lists.
I didn't misss your point at all; for instance if you had been booked on 868 this am you would have gotten your upgrade in advance at your 'window" as it was still showing I6 at 7am today. The HKG flt was not and was oversold. And BTW there were upgrade stdby pax for 868 even with the flt having been wide open all week an none for the HKG flt.

They have passenger status lists. If they're going to block all J seats and dole upgrades out at the gate, then why have paper? It's entirely irrelevant
see above.

All the paper does is give the customer a false sense that they can purchase an eligible fare class ticket and confirm an upgrade in advance... but you can't when AC is zeroing out the class bucket. That sounds like bait and switch to me.
Ac does NOT zero out the I class bucket per se;the yield management system does it and that's what needs adjusting. Don't forget that AC ony introduced I class less than six months ago and in typical AC style they proably did not have their data base quite set up to monitor it.
parnel is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 3:27 pm
  #33  
exAC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by parnel
.... Don't forget that AC ony introduced I class less than six months ago and in typical AC style they proably did not have their data base quite set up to monitor it.
In order to forcast the database needs historical data.

Without the historical data the system works no better than the instant experts on FT that stick their finger in the air and yell 'GIMME'.
 
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 3:28 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 715
Don't believe for a second that AC is not managing I space. When it was first introduced I was always equal to C. Slowly that changed to I almost always being less than C and very often equal to zero.

I think that AC is purposely making it less likely that many status (especially P and E) cannot upgrade in advance. On 5 out of 5 transatlantic flights I have taken this year, I was zeroed out. However on all 5 my ugprade was confirmed in advance off the waitlist without any opening of I. I was told once that the flight controllers watch for SE's on the waitlist and will upgrade them. I don't know if this is true, but that is my experience.
DutchSE is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 3:37 pm
  #35  
exAC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by DutchSE
......controllers watch for SE's on the waitlist and will upgrade them. I don't know if this is true, but that is my experience.
Now that you have mentioned it, that is a benefit that should be taken away.
 
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 4:28 pm
  #36  
Original Poster
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by exAC
Now that you have mentioned it, that is a benefit that should be taken away.
Them's fightin' words boy!!
parnel is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 4:31 pm
  #37  
Original Poster
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by DutchSE
Don't believe for a second that AC is not managing I space. When it was first introduced I was always equal to C.
I don't know what it takes to make you understand the yield management system airlines use. simply put flts get to a certain sell point and their data base tells them there is likely hood they will sell X more seats and it then closes off things like C/I class but leaves anywhere from 1 to 9 seats for sale in each "revenue" class until they hit their oversell limits
parnel is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 4:54 pm
  #38  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,170
If AC/AE continues to offer upgrade certificates as one of the benefits of higher tier AE membership, then reasonable no. of "I" seats must be made available (in advance and last minute at the gate when there are surplus unsold business class seats) regardless of the yield management system. It's a cost of doing business. It's the cost for having such a FF programme. AC cannot have the marketing guys on the one hand promoting come fly with us, when you reach P, E, SE, you get certificates for complimentary upgrade when the yield management guys say, wait, we can sell those seats at full fare, why let someone fly in business at the price of economy!

If the certificate says with Y or M fare, one could reserve the upgrade at any time, there must be reasonable expectation to be able to do so, including sponsorship of the travel companion. Therefore, "I" should start at 2 rather than 1 as it appears to be the case for many international flights.

Last edited by Clipper801; Oct 21, 2005 at 5:09 pm
Clipper801 is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 5:13 pm
  #39  
Original Poster
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by Clipper801
If AC/AE continues to offer upgrade certificates as one of the benefits of higher tier AE membership, then reasonable no. of "I" seats must be made available (in advance and last minute at the gate when there are surplus unsold business class seats) regardless of the yield management system. It's a cost of doing business. It's the cost for having such a FF programme. AC cannot have the marketing guys on the one hand promoting come fly with us, when you reach P, E, SE, you get certificates for complimentary upgrade when the yield management guys say, wait, we can sell those seats at full fare, why let someone fly in business at the price of economy!

If the certificate says with Y or M fare, one could reserve the upgrade at any time, there must be reasonable expectation to be able to do so, including sponsorship of the travel companion. Therefore, "I" should start at 2 rather than 1 as it appears to be the case for many international flights.
You wouldn't work in any of the businesses I know with that attitude. Profit is first........everything else is second because w/o profit there is no AC.
parnel is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 5:40 pm
  #40  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: AC.SE
Posts: 2,584
Originally Posted by Clipper801
if AC will add a line in bold on the upgrade certificate that "confirmed upgrade reservation is not guaranteed and may be cancelled at the pleasure of AC at any time with or without cause." While this may not happen often, it has known to have happened.
I also think this should be stated--either that, or put a word other than "confirmed" on the itinerary/PNR/wherever this information is kept for segments in I class.

If you're confirmed in Y or J on a paid ticket, and you're denied boarding/downgraded from J, you'll usually be compensated in some way. The word "confirmed" means something in those contexts. If you're "confirmed" in I, there is a chance--however small--that you will not be flying in J, and you may not be compensated if that happens.

Whether AC is being unfair to those few FFs in I who do have to downgrade, particularly after paying for a Y or M fare to get the instant upgrade, is a different question. But if AC makes it clear that upgrading to I class is subject to space availability, and that space availability is not only a function of the literal availability in I (ie, may also be a function of aircraft downgrade, last minute paid J walkons, etc.), then the FFs who lose out won't have much to complain about.
ylwae is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 5:46 pm
  #41  
Original Poster
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by ylwae
I also think this should be stated--either that, or put a word other than "confirmed" on the itinerary/PNR/wherever this information is kept for segments in I class.

If you're confirmed in Y or J on a paid ticket, and you're denied boarding/downgraded from J, you'll usually be compensated in some way. The word "confirmed" means something in those contexts. If you're "confirmed" in I, there is a chance--however small--that you will not be flying in J, and you may not be compensated if that happens.

Whether AC is being unfair to those few FFs in I who do have to downgrade, particularly after paying for a Y or M fare to get the instant upgrade, is a different question. But if AC makes it clear that upgrading to I class is subject to space availability, and that space availability is not only a function of the literal availability in I (ie, may also be a function of aircraft downgrade, last minute paid J walkons, etc.), then the FFs who lose out won't have much to complain about.
You all seem to forget that by buying an M or Y fare you are able to UG with a SWU cert. in lieu of a SSWU. So there is value there. Getting downgraded is a bummer no doubt but I don't think it happens much in reality. In fact for E's and SE's it's probably statistically close to zero and most likely less than one per cent..
parnel is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 6:10 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Citizen of Canada, Member of the World!
Programs: AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AG... you get the picture
Posts: 2,091
Originally Posted by parnel
I don't know what it takes to make you understand the yield management system airlines use. simply put flts get to a certain sell point and their data base tells them there is likely hood they will sell X more seats and it then closes off things like C/I class but leaves anywhere from 1 to 9 seats for sale in each "revenue" class until they hit their oversell limits
and what's probably happening (contrary to all of those conspiracy believers out there) is that the lack of baseline data to tune the application means that it's probably a bit more "aggressive" at protecting a potential revenue seat than what we've come to expect. That's plausible.

But back to what I think is the root of the problem... it's expectations. I think that Air Canada (right or wrong) has established expectations in us that by holding an upgrade certificate, it means upgrade space is available. By turning it into a "space available" program smacks of deceptive marketing... or bait and switch.

"Here's an upgrade coupon - you can confirm an upgrade 72 hrs in advance with an applicable fare basis" = BAIT

"whoops, our system zeroed out the upgrade class to protect potential revenue because we don't have enough experience in tuning it. Sorry" = SWITCH
Fermat is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 6:27 pm
  #43  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OGG, YYC, YYZ
Programs: AC
Posts: 3,710
Originally Posted by parnel
So there is value there. Getting downgraded is a bummer no doubt but I don't think it happens much in reality. In fact for E's and SE's it's probably statistically close to zero and most likely less than one per cent..
I've been using AC upgrades with considerable frequency since the concept of upgrade certificates was introduced. I've probably confirmed upgrades 200+ times. Only once out of those 200+ times was my J seat unavailable (due to an unscheduled 320->319 equipment downgrade).

I think the matter of a confirmed upgrade seat being unavailable is simply a non-issue.
After Burner is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 7:07 pm
  #44  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,170
Without customer, there is no profit.
Clipper801 is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 7:39 pm
  #45  
Original Poster
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
[QUOTE=Fermat]
and what's probably happening (contrary to all of those conspiracy believers out there) is that the lack of baseline data to tune the application means that it's probably a bit more "aggressive" at protecting a potential revenue seat than what we've come to expect. That's plausible
Ah, light bulbs turning on

But back to what I think is the root of the problem... it's expectations. I think that Air Canada (right or wrong) has established expectations in us that by holding an upgrade certificate, it means upgrade space is available. By turning it into a "space available" program smacks of deceptive marketing... or bait and switch.
All airlines do this and people have the same expectations with them. Ac needs an outlet for those who don't get I and an E plus type of seat could be the answer. No airline will give up seats specifically for upgrade classes if they can sell the seat at higher prices


"Here's an upgrade coupon - you can confirm an upgrade 72 hrs in advance with an applicable fare basis" = BAIT
Only on a seat available basis

"whoops, our system zeroed out the upgrade class to protect potential revenue because we don't have enough experience in tuning it. Sorry" = SWITCH
Well you can do what some do and buy Discounted C or J to be sure. you are asking for a freebie to be guaranted because your employer won't pay for a higher priced seat.So, you blame the airline?
parnel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.