AC reports highest Oct. load factor ever
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,547
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,190
Didn't Coffee Bean say AC's numbers would plunge in November? Looks like AC is still 4-1/2 points higher than WestJet which has a smaller more compact network and generally is the low fare carrier. Something's not going right over in Calgary. (No computer problems to rationalize this year's performance!)
Last edited by Shareholder; Dec 6, 2005 at 8:21 am
#33
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 715
Originally Posted by Shareholder
Didn't Coffee Bean say AC's numbers would plunge in November? Looks like AC is still 4-1/2 points higher than WestJet which has a smaller more compact network and generally is the low fare carrier. Something's not going right over in Calgary. (No computer problems to rationalize this year's performance!)
#34
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by airbus320
Ac will possibly now be compared to its peers in the US.
#35
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ at this time
Programs: ACMM / Altitude S100K / HH Diamond
Posts: 6,285
Even Jazz did well this year ...
"Jazz nearly doubled its passenger traffic to 248 million RPMs while increasing its capacity by 91.4 per cent to 358 available seat miles. Load factor at Jazz improved slightly to 69.3 per cent last month from 66.8 per cent in November 2004."
Link: http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...l=969048863851
"Jazz nearly doubled its passenger traffic to 248 million RPMs while increasing its capacity by 91.4 per cent to 358 available seat miles. Load factor at Jazz improved slightly to 69.3 per cent last month from 66.8 per cent in November 2004."
Link: http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...l=969048863851
#36




Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 826
Didn't Coffee Bean say AC's numbers would plunge in November? Looks like AC is still 4-1/2 points higher than WestJet which has a smaller more compact network and generally is the low fare carrier. Something's not going right over in Calgary. (No computer problems to rationalize this year's performance!)
#37
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by Hypnotize
Air Canada needs a much higher load factor than Westjet to breakeven.
#39
Suspended
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 692
ACE's break-even load factor, (including interest expense) will be around 80% in the 4th quarter. WJA's will be about 69%.
October and November shows ACE consolidated at 76.7%, WJA at 72.7%.
I'd imagine ACE consolidated will do about 78.5% in Dec, WJA about 73.5%, meaning ACE's consolidated 4Q l/f will be around 77.4%, and WJA's around 73.2%.
At an 80% breakeven, ACE is on track to lose about $78m including interest expense in the quarter, WJA will make around $20m.
ACE is operating barely 80% of their summer ASM's capacity so far this quarter. WJ is operating about 94% of their summer capacity.
So for those of you keeping score, at current costs and yields, ACE will need to have a load factor of about 86% in December to break-even on an operating basis in this quarter, using the same methodology as WJ, (ie including interest expense as an operating cost).
October and November shows ACE consolidated at 76.7%, WJA at 72.7%.
I'd imagine ACE consolidated will do about 78.5% in Dec, WJA about 73.5%, meaning ACE's consolidated 4Q l/f will be around 77.4%, and WJA's around 73.2%.
At an 80% breakeven, ACE is on track to lose about $78m including interest expense in the quarter, WJA will make around $20m.
ACE is operating barely 80% of their summer ASM's capacity so far this quarter. WJ is operating about 94% of their summer capacity.
So for those of you keeping score, at current costs and yields, ACE will need to have a load factor of about 86% in December to break-even on an operating basis in this quarter, using the same methodology as WJ, (ie including interest expense as an operating cost).
#40
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by Coffeebean
ACE's break-even load factor, (including interest expense) will be around 80% in the 4th quarter. WJA's will be about 69%.
October and November shows ACE consolidated at 76.7%, WJA at 72.7%.
I'd imagine ACE consolidated will do about 78.5% in Dec, WJA about 73.5%, meaning ACE's consolidated 4Q l/f will be around 77.4%, and WJA's around 73.2%.
At an 80% breakeven, ACE is on track to lose about $78m including interest expense in the quarter, WJA will make around $20m.
ACE is operating barely 80% of their summer ASM's capacity so far this quarter. WJ is operating about 94% of their summer capacity.
So for those of you keeping score, at current costs and yields, ACE will need to have a load factor of about 86% in December to break-even on an operating basis in this quarter, using the same methodology as WJ, (ie including interest expense as an operating cost).
October and November shows ACE consolidated at 76.7%, WJA at 72.7%.
I'd imagine ACE consolidated will do about 78.5% in Dec, WJA about 73.5%, meaning ACE's consolidated 4Q l/f will be around 77.4%, and WJA's around 73.2%.
At an 80% breakeven, ACE is on track to lose about $78m including interest expense in the quarter, WJA will make around $20m.
ACE is operating barely 80% of their summer ASM's capacity so far this quarter. WJ is operating about 94% of their summer capacity.
So for those of you keeping score, at current costs and yields, ACE will need to have a load factor of about 86% in December to break-even on an operating basis in this quarter, using the same methodology as WJ, (ie including interest expense as an operating cost).

#42
At Large
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by DutchSE
Aren't you a shareholder? Should you have insider sources?
What nonsense you think up.
#43
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
[QUOTE=parnel]I don't have inside sources but I do speak with employees who tell me they are very busy this month and loads are very good ex YYZ.
QUOTE]
lets hope one of them is a VP in finance.
QUOTE]
lets hope one of them is a VP in finance.
#44
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 715
Originally Posted by parnel
I don't have inside sources but I do speak with employees who tell me they are very busy this month and loads are very good ex YYZ.
What nonsense you think up.
What nonsense you think up.

Well, you seem to suggest a lot that your "sources" provide you with information that the rest of us don't have (ie inside souces). The fact that this information actually comes from anecdotal opinions of employees is good to know for us trying to interpret your "sources".
#45
Suspended
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 692
Once again, we see one of Parnel's classic retorts.
Not one to deal with anything that verges on fact, his analysis consists of discussions with a few frontline employees and concludes that anyone that does not concur with his opinion is FOC. Brilliant. Simply Brilliant.
ACE's consolidated Oct and November loads are a matter of public record. 9b asms and 6.9b rpms = 76.7% load factor.
Capacity will increase somewhat in December, but only in the latter half of the month. Last year, they did about 4.4b asms in the month, about 14% higher than November 2004. That suggests ACE will produce about 4.7b asms in Dec 2005.
ACE produced a 74.8% consolidated lf last December. It's a fair guess they maybe able to increase that l/f to 77.5% this year.
That results in a consolidated 4Q l/f of 77%.
ACE managed to get casm down to 15.26 cents by flying almost 17B asms in 3q. However, they'll be hard pressed to produce much more than 13.7b asms in the 4th quarter. That'll force CASM, (including interest expense), up pretty close to 17 cents for the quarter as all those fixed costs are divided by about 81% of the asms produced in peak summer months.
4th quarter yields should be much higher than third quarter yields (20.3 cents), and probably a little higher than 2nd quarter yields, (21.2 cents). Lets say 21.35 cents, because there has been a fare amount of discounting during the quarter.
So, if you are keeping track, that results in a breakeven load factor of 79.6% and an operating loss including interest expense, of about $78m.
If you exclude interest expense as an operating cost, it's a 4th quarter operating profit of between $1 and $2m,assuming interest expense stays at the 3rd quarters $76m. That's an operating margin of about .1% on revenues of $2.25b. That's not much of a return.
If you exclude interest expense as an operating cost on WJ's side of the equation, ($13.9m in the third quarter), and add back in profit sharing, that suggests a 4th quarter operating profit of $33m, or a margin of 9.3%.
Obviously, no one knows what will happen in Dec, but history has a way of repeating itself.
We'll see what happens when they report in late Jan, early Feb.
Not one to deal with anything that verges on fact, his analysis consists of discussions with a few frontline employees and concludes that anyone that does not concur with his opinion is FOC. Brilliant. Simply Brilliant.
ACE's consolidated Oct and November loads are a matter of public record. 9b asms and 6.9b rpms = 76.7% load factor.
Capacity will increase somewhat in December, but only in the latter half of the month. Last year, they did about 4.4b asms in the month, about 14% higher than November 2004. That suggests ACE will produce about 4.7b asms in Dec 2005.
ACE produced a 74.8% consolidated lf last December. It's a fair guess they maybe able to increase that l/f to 77.5% this year.
That results in a consolidated 4Q l/f of 77%.
ACE managed to get casm down to 15.26 cents by flying almost 17B asms in 3q. However, they'll be hard pressed to produce much more than 13.7b asms in the 4th quarter. That'll force CASM, (including interest expense), up pretty close to 17 cents for the quarter as all those fixed costs are divided by about 81% of the asms produced in peak summer months.
4th quarter yields should be much higher than third quarter yields (20.3 cents), and probably a little higher than 2nd quarter yields, (21.2 cents). Lets say 21.35 cents, because there has been a fare amount of discounting during the quarter.
So, if you are keeping track, that results in a breakeven load factor of 79.6% and an operating loss including interest expense, of about $78m.
If you exclude interest expense as an operating cost, it's a 4th quarter operating profit of between $1 and $2m,assuming interest expense stays at the 3rd quarters $76m. That's an operating margin of about .1% on revenues of $2.25b. That's not much of a return.
If you exclude interest expense as an operating cost on WJ's side of the equation, ($13.9m in the third quarter), and add back in profit sharing, that suggests a 4th quarter operating profit of $33m, or a margin of 9.3%.
Obviously, no one knows what will happen in Dec, but history has a way of repeating itself.
We'll see what happens when they report in late Jan, early Feb.

