SQ to fly n/s from SIN-USA
Oct 15, 2003, 9:34 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,029
Oct 15, 2003, 10:22 am
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,451
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Ferrari:
actually....
The people that pay the full J and F will take these and leave the MR flight to us, opening up more J seats...
sweet......</font>
actually....
The people that pay the full J and F will take these and leave the MR flight to us, opening up more J seats...
sweet......</font>
Oct 15, 2003, 10:40 am
#6
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 450
Hmm, somewhat puzzling, since I read on the UA forum that the airline maintains 3 class service on east coast to LAX flights because of actor's union requirements that specify F is a must. So they use old planes, with an F section, that are often somewhat empty in the back, to capture this very high yield traffic. I'm sure some movie stars and actors need to go to and from SIN to LAX, and they could be charged a small fortune for SQ F service!
(Now what this has to do with Aeroplan is beyond me, I'm sure if we were moderated (please, no) this thread would be pulled!)
(Now what this has to do with Aeroplan is beyond me, I'm sure if we were moderated (please, no) this thread would be pulled!)
Oct 15, 2003, 5:52 pm
#7
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: YYZ/YHM/BUF
Programs: AA Plat, HH Gold, MR Plat
Posts: 4,212
America West is going to kill UA and AA's yields with their new non-stop JFK/BOS-LAX/SFO services. They're offering $198 r/t fares in coach, and $399 o/w fares in first with no Saturday night stay requirements. In addition, they're giving away Silver Elite status for completing two round-trips in these new markets. The days of paying $2000+ for a "business-friendly" transcon ticket are about to end.
Oct 15, 2003, 6:36 pm
#8
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 5,077
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by marbuck:
Now what this has to do with Aeroplan is beyond me</font>
Now what this has to do with Aeroplan is beyond me</font>
Oct 16, 2003, 1:55 am
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,451
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by keithguy:
It makes one (well, at least me) wonder whether how much Aeroplan will charge for a reward booking in SQ's Executive Economy (if that flight is allowed for reward redemption).</font>
It makes one (well, at least me) wonder whether how much Aeroplan will charge for a reward booking in SQ's Executive Economy (if that flight is allowed for reward redemption).</font>
Ergo - regular mileage requirement
Oct 16, 2003, 10:58 am
#10
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 5,077
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by LondonElite:
I think Yahoo got a bit confused. The entire Y section will be 7-abreast, with 5cm more pitch than regular SQ Y. As far as I can gather from the SQ board, there is no 'intermediate' economy cabin.
Ergo - regular mileage requirement</font>
I think Yahoo got a bit confused. The entire Y section will be 7-abreast, with 5cm more pitch than regular SQ Y. As far as I can gather from the SQ board, there is no 'intermediate' economy cabin.
Ergo - regular mileage requirement</font>