AC rules out 'colossal failure' of government stake for aid; bailout debate thread
#1
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,449
AC rules out 'colossal failure' of government stake for aid; bailout debate thread
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/air-cana...says-1.1524424
Air Canada’s chief executive officer said the airline is open to providing refunds for cancelled flights in exchange for government aid, adding that the company has no interest in offering Ottawa an equity stake.
Air Canada’s chief executive officer said the airline is open to providing refunds for cancelled flights in exchange for government aid, adding that the company has no interest in offering Ottawa an equity stake.
#2
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,203
So he's basically saying:
- we have a decent/enough amount of cash (translation: we have enough cash to refund passengers for flights they paid for but didn't receive)
- we predict we can survive through the pandemic without government help
- since no one is forcing us to, we're not gonna issue the refunds. (translation: it's not in our interest to do the right thing, so we won't do it)
- we will only refund passengers voluntarily if the government offers an incentive for us to do so
#3
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,195
I didn't think corporations could be this evil--or bold--until I read this article.
-Plenty of capital already
-Won't repay cancelled tickets (many legally required via US DOT and thousands were sold with AC never intending to operate all the flights)
unless governmentsues them
unless governmentpays them for the refunds
unless government pays them for the refunds PLUS substantial additional money. for, umm, reasons.
-With nothing offered in return. No airline equity.
They not only unafraid of government sanctions or legal ramifications. They are doubling down and telling the government to pay Air Canada.
//Competing airlines should run commercials showing people calling police in tears to report a theft of a family's yearlong savings. Have police show up in full force before cancelling the call... "false alarm, it's just Air Canada. Everyone knows we let them rob you blind and might even pay them for doing so."
-Plenty of capital already
-Won't repay cancelled tickets (many legally required via US DOT and thousands were sold with AC never intending to operate all the flights)
unless government
unless government
unless government pays them for the refunds PLUS substantial additional money. for, umm, reasons.
-With nothing offered in return. No airline equity.
They not only unafraid of government sanctions or legal ramifications. They are doubling down and telling the government to pay Air Canada.
//Competing airlines should run commercials showing people calling police in tears to report a theft of a family's yearlong savings. Have police show up in full force before cancelling the call... "false alarm, it's just Air Canada. Everyone knows we let them rob you blind and might even pay them for doing so."
Last edited by expert7700; Nov 18, 2020 at 9:16 pm
#4
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Erstwhile Accidental AC E35K
Posts: 2,916
Calin talks about “government aid” and “support by government”. Why would they need or want this? Because the commercial lending markets won’t touch them, at least not without reasonable security, and even then they’ll expect a decent rate that reflects the risk. So he wants an unsecured, low or zero interest loan from “government”, which actually means vicariously from each and every one of us, whether we agree to take the risk or not. My fear is the “the government” might just be stupid enough to lend them my money with no security, no equity, and a fairly shaky prospect of getting it back. So I’m perfectly okay if Calin wants to go it alone without my backing.
#5
Join Date: Mar 2020
Programs: AC 75k
Posts: 704
Lord knows I am not an AC fanboy - just read any of my posts, but dang that guy is good when he has to be the face of the company!
His job is to maximize profits for his shareholders, and he served them well. His isn't there to be a nice guy or do the right thing, which I wish people would, but rarely do. He truly pushed AC through an unprecedented growth, and when the inevitable collapse occurred, he had the company prepared, and now is looking Gov't in the eye and asking, 'Who will blink first?'
His job is to maximize profits for his shareholders, and he served them well. His isn't there to be a nice guy or do the right thing, which I wish people would, but rarely do. He truly pushed AC through an unprecedented growth, and when the inevitable collapse occurred, he had the company prepared, and now is looking Gov't in the eye and asking, 'Who will blink first?'
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,449
#7
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Erstwhile Accidental AC E35K
Posts: 2,916
#8
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AC SE100K 1MM, FB Platinum, Bonvoy Platinum Elite, IHG Gold Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,604
From the interview with Calin:
“Our objective has been not only to survive, but to be competitive coming out of the pandemic,” Rovinescu said. “We’re competing with carriers around the world that have been supported by their government, so we’d hope the terms would be on a reasonable basis.”
I would suggest there is little doubt that AC will be able to return to profitability when travel returns to pre-COVID levels. Their management team has been able to create a pretty robust carrier over the last 10 years that seems to be able to manage even the most severe downturn. Porter may not survive (they haven't been able to restart), AC is gobbling up Transat (if they get approval), and they have pretty robust JV's and interline agreements with multiple carrier partners around the world. The next 12 months will be really tough, but if they can keep their burn rate below 8 million dollars a day, they may be able to hold losses to well under a billion dollars a quarter. Although that is a lot over 4 quarters, with the amount of liquidity raised already, they will definitely be able to weather 2021.
“Our objective has been not only to survive, but to be competitive coming out of the pandemic,” Rovinescu said. “We’re competing with carriers around the world that have been supported by their government, so we’d hope the terms would be on a reasonable basis.”
I would suggest there is little doubt that AC will be able to return to profitability when travel returns to pre-COVID levels. Their management team has been able to create a pretty robust carrier over the last 10 years that seems to be able to manage even the most severe downturn. Porter may not survive (they haven't been able to restart), AC is gobbling up Transat (if they get approval), and they have pretty robust JV's and interline agreements with multiple carrier partners around the world. The next 12 months will be really tough, but if they can keep their burn rate below 8 million dollars a day, they may be able to hold losses to well under a billion dollars a quarter. Although that is a lot over 4 quarters, with the amount of liquidity raised already, they will definitely be able to weather 2021.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,331
From the interview with Calin:
“Our objective has been not only to survive, but to be competitive coming out of the pandemic,” Rovinescu said. “We’re competing with carriers around the world that have been supported by their government, so we’d hope the terms would be on a reasonable basis.”
I would suggest there is little doubt that AC will be able to return to profitability when travel returns to pre-COVID levels. Their management team has been able to create a pretty robust carrier over the last 10 years that seems to be able to manage even the most severe downturn. Porter may not survive (they haven't been able to restart), AC is gobbling up Transat (if they get approval), and they have pretty robust JV's and interline agreements with multiple carrier partners around the world. The next 12 months will be really tough, but if they can keep their burn rate below 8 million dollars a day, they may be able to hold losses to well under a billion dollars a quarter. Although that is a lot over 4 quarters, with the amount of liquidity raised already, they will definitely be able to weather 2021.
“Our objective has been not only to survive, but to be competitive coming out of the pandemic,” Rovinescu said. “We’re competing with carriers around the world that have been supported by their government, so we’d hope the terms would be on a reasonable basis.”
I would suggest there is little doubt that AC will be able to return to profitability when travel returns to pre-COVID levels. Their management team has been able to create a pretty robust carrier over the last 10 years that seems to be able to manage even the most severe downturn. Porter may not survive (they haven't been able to restart), AC is gobbling up Transat (if they get approval), and they have pretty robust JV's and interline agreements with multiple carrier partners around the world. The next 12 months will be really tough, but if they can keep their burn rate below 8 million dollars a day, they may be able to hold losses to well under a billion dollars a quarter. Although that is a lot over 4 quarters, with the amount of liquidity raised already, they will definitely be able to weather 2021.
#10
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AC SE100K 1MM, FB Platinum, Bonvoy Platinum Elite, IHG Gold Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,604
What will be interesting will be what various entities require as proof of vaccination (such as AC) and how the interplay between this and privacy laws pan out. I would assume (although I certainly could be wrong) that if you are vaccinated, and can provide proof of it, that international travel may be possible again. Big assumption however.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,003
PD has been able to restart. They have chosen not to for economic reasons.
A large portion of their business is to regions that require 14 day quarantine either at destination or upon return.
I'm suprised they haven't been running a few flights to YOW/YUL.
Apparently there isn't enough business traffic on those routes to profitably run a few planes.
A large portion of their business is to regions that require 14 day quarantine either at destination or upon return.
I'm suprised they haven't been running a few flights to YOW/YUL.
Apparently there isn't enough business traffic on those routes to profitably run a few planes.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,331
That's a very fair comment. It seems likely that inoculation with the vaccine will begin by the second quarter of 2021. As a healthcare worker in Alberta, and with the 650K doses purchased by the Alberta government, I suspect I will likely be immunised by the end of the second quarter at the latest.
What will be interesting will be what various entities require as proof of vaccination (such as AC) and how the interplay between this and privacy laws pan out. I would assume (although I certainly could be wrong) that if you are vaccinated, and can provide proof of it, that international travel may be possible again. Big assumption however.
What will be interesting will be what various entities require as proof of vaccination (such as AC) and how the interplay between this and privacy laws pan out. I would assume (although I certainly could be wrong) that if you are vaccinated, and can provide proof of it, that international travel may be possible again. Big assumption however.
A lot of companies have realized certain types of business travel is pointless, given the current state of technology. Some business travel is gone forever. If that represents 5% of AC's lucrative travel, they'll be profitable again in short order. If it's 50%, that could be much more challenging, and AC will have to figure out how to adapt.
#13
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AC SE100K 1MM, FB Platinum, Bonvoy Platinum Elite, IHG Gold Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,604
That's not even my point.
A lot of companies have realized certain types of business travel is pointless, given the current state of technology. Some business travel is gone forever. If that represents 5% of AC's lucrative travel, they'll be profitable again in short order. If it's 50%, that could be much more challenging, and AC will have to figure out how to adapt.
A lot of companies have realized certain types of business travel is pointless, given the current state of technology. Some business travel is gone forever. If that represents 5% of AC's lucrative travel, they'll be profitable again in short order. If it's 50%, that could be much more challenging, and AC will have to figure out how to adapt.
#14
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,728
PD has been able to restart. They have chosen not to for economic reasons.
A large portion of their business is to regions that require 14 day quarantine either at destination or upon return.
I'm suprised they haven't been running a few flights to YOW/YUL.
Apparently there isn't enough business traffic on those routes to profitably run a few planes.
A large portion of their business is to regions that require 14 day quarantine either at destination or upon return.
I'm suprised they haven't been running a few flights to YOW/YUL.
Apparently there isn't enough business traffic on those routes to profitably run a few planes.
WS and AC usually combine for about 30 YOW-YYZ non-stops a day.
Tomorrow, it's a total of five, and that's one of the busier routes in the country.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 53
From the interview with Calin:
“Our objective has been not only to survive, but to be competitive coming out of the pandemic,” Rovinescu said. “We’re competing with carriers around the world that have been supported by their government, so we’d hope the terms would be on a reasonable basis.”
I would suggest there is little doubt that AC will be able to return to profitability when travel returns to pre-COVID levels. Their management team has been able to create a pretty robust carrier over the last 10 years that seems to be able to manage even the most severe downturn. Porter may not survive (they haven't been able to restart), AC is gobbling up Transat (if they get approval), and they have pretty robust JV's and interline agreements with multiple carrier partners around the world. The next 12 months will be really tough, but if they can keep their burn rate below 8 million dollars a day, they may be able to hold losses to well under a billion dollars a quarter. Although that is a lot over 4 quarters, with the amount of liquidity raised already, they will definitely be able to weather 2021.
“Our objective has been not only to survive, but to be competitive coming out of the pandemic,” Rovinescu said. “We’re competing with carriers around the world that have been supported by their government, so we’d hope the terms would be on a reasonable basis.”
I would suggest there is little doubt that AC will be able to return to profitability when travel returns to pre-COVID levels. Their management team has been able to create a pretty robust carrier over the last 10 years that seems to be able to manage even the most severe downturn. Porter may not survive (they haven't been able to restart), AC is gobbling up Transat (if they get approval), and they have pretty robust JV's and interline agreements with multiple carrier partners around the world. The next 12 months will be really tough, but if they can keep their burn rate below 8 million dollars a day, they may be able to hold losses to well under a billion dollars a quarter. Although that is a lot over 4 quarters, with the amount of liquidity raised already, they will definitely be able to weather 2021.