FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Air Canada | Aeroplan (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan-375/)
-   -   Olympian not happy with economy seating (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan/1895810-olympian-not-happy-economy-seating.html)

longtimeflyin Feb 26, 2018 8:56 am


Originally Posted by Low Roller (Post 29460394)
Fair enough, some organization paid for it, but he still got a free ride.

Nothing wrong with receiving a free ride; however, like all elite/super elite members, each has their own upgrade currencies to use to upgrade said ticket, whether or not they be eUpgrade credits, cash, or Aeroplan miles provided an eligible fare was purchased for the latter.

ffsim Feb 26, 2018 9:01 am

Not surprised to see the conversation quickly turn to the athlete's "entitlement." Truth be told, it's probably the best explanation for Sebastien's tweet.

But:


Originally Posted by mjmqm (Post 29460268)
In defence of this particular athlete, Air Canada will maximize his gold medal to Air Canada's best advantage.

This is the first thing that I thought of. My Instagram and Facebook feeds have been plastered with Air Canada ads depicting people proudly waving the Canadian flag. AC is milking their Olympics support like crazy, and yet they can't find a way to do a little something for a gold medal winner. We've had 11. Eleven. That's it. Give the guy a preferred seat if you absolutely can't upgrade him, but give. him. something.

Roger Federer gets a Rolex when he wins a Grand Slam, and he definitely doesn't need anyone to buy him a wristwatch. Rolex wants to promote their star athletes (ambassadors) and puts their money where their mouth is when the athletes perform. Same with many other brands.

Why is it so unfair to expect the same of AC?


Originally Posted by Adam Smith (Post 29460130)
On those flights, J is likely packed with people who actually paid there. What would you have AC do, kick out someone who actually paid for J so that this guy can sit there? What if the women's hockey team had won gold, would you have given them the entire J cabin?

I think they would fit in the PY cabin. Maybe put the goalies in J since they have oversized luggage ;)

HomerJay Feb 26, 2018 9:02 am

So with the flight sold out, and with all the seats up front sold out, which paying passenger does he expect they should bump back to coach to accommodate his privileged freeloading rear end?

Eh?

Low Roller Feb 26, 2018 9:04 am


Originally Posted by rankourabu (Post 29460440)
By that definition, 98% of AC SEs are getting a free ride because "some organization" pays for their tickets.

True, but most of those organizations aren't flying their people around the world to play in the snow (Sorry - the Olympics always bring out the worst in me ;))

greggarious Feb 26, 2018 9:13 am


Originally Posted by longtimeflyin (Post 29460088)
If he doesn't like it he can pay to upgrade. He's an Olympic athlete, not a soldier who is returning from an active military conflict, or a veteran, or something that is also considered a "noble" profession. Yes, some of you may believe that Olympic athletes hold a noble profession or that Air Canada should have "stepped up" and upgraded all Olympic athletes because they are an official partner, but I suspect the eupgraders on this board would lose their collective cool if they were bumped.

Competing in an event that promotes peace between countries is probably more noble than shooting people to secure cheap oil - we haven't had a war of self defense in a long time :)

californiadreamin' Feb 26, 2018 9:13 am

About that E75 status
 
The sponsorship is organisational, not individual. IIRC, the indicated status came with the sponsorship so as to make accorded privileges, the steps of the journey, and any communication, clear and easy for athletes, officials, and AC employees to manage.
​​​​​​As for providing "something" well, just imagine how many tier passengers there are onboard that flight overall.

canolakid Feb 26, 2018 9:25 am

[QUOTE=ffsim;29460492

AC is milking their Olympics support like crazy, and yet they can't find a way to do a little something for a gold medal winner. We've had 11. Eleven. That's it. Give the guy a preferred seat if you absolutely can't upgrade him, but give. him. something.

[/QUOTE]

This is where the conversation needs to move towards. Not just what does AC 'get' for its sponsorship investment, but what does the COC or Sports Federation 'receive'- laying odds that senior admin are on a different travel class than the actual field hands- but would love to be proven wrong...

Jebby_ca Feb 26, 2018 9:28 am

Is everyone else failing to see the #sarcasm tag on his post?

NoTravelIsFree Feb 26, 2018 9:29 am


Originally Posted by greggarious (Post 29460535)
Competing in an event that promotes peace between countries is probably more noble than shooting people to secure cheap oil - we haven't had a war of self defense in a long time :)

How exactly does the Olympics promote peace? As far as I can see it promotes athletics and partisanship. I'll not get started on the financial cost of the games and the other negative aspects.

ffsim Feb 26, 2018 9:33 am


Originally Posted by Jebby_ca (Post 29460622)
Is everyone else failing to see the #sarcasm tag on his post?

That hashtag relates to the "what a great Olympic partner" statement, not the gist of his gripe.

Proudelitist Feb 26, 2018 9:43 am

DYWKIA of the highest order. Athletes..I swear. Don't like coach? Buy an upgrade.

RangerNS Feb 26, 2018 9:43 am


Originally Posted by Adam Smith (Post 29460320)
He will actually get paid $20K as a bonus for winning the gold.

As for his ticket, no, AC didn't give it to him, the COC or, more likely, his sporting federation paid for it, although I believe there's a reduced rate of some sort. But it's not free.

Even worse than not being free, someone might have forced him to use Egencia to book it.

Jebby_ca Feb 26, 2018 9:46 am


Originally Posted by ffsim (Post 29460636)
That hashtag relates to the "what a great Olympic partner" statement, not the gist of his gripe.

Ok... even if I take your understanding of what the hashtag applies to... what is his gripe? Clearly, he wasn't looking at getting a free upgrade from Air Canada if he was being sarcastic about his "what a great Olympic partner" remark. What if he was simply stating that 2 days ago, he won gold but now he's seated in 57A on his way home? Who honestly likes sitting in 57A anyway?

YYC traveler Feb 26, 2018 9:57 am


Originally Posted by Jebby_ca (Post 29460622)
Is everyone else failing to see the #sarcasm tag on his post?

Yes I did. I also saw the :td: he gives AC before the tag.

thunderlounge Feb 26, 2018 10:05 am


Originally Posted by Adam Smith (Post 29460130)
Right, so AC isn't doing any worse than the US Olympic team's airline. But next you'll probably tell us how wonderful UA is and how they would have let all these nice Olympians fly in J.

Just to be clear, the US Curling team was on DL, but the US Olympic partner is UA. (Bolding mine)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.