Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Ridiculous hold times with AC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2016, 1:37 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 2,344
Originally Posted by canadiancow
Imagine if you could do most reasonable things online.

I'd never have to call in.

For example, the majority (well over 50%) of my calls to the concierge line are for same day changes.

Reservations is to handle schedule changes, select seats, get partner booking references, etc.

As a result, by improving the website, they could reduce hold times.
Totally agree - most of my calls to AC are related to IT fails. I've been putting off calling them for a seat selection change for some upcoming flights, as it's the app won't let me change seats, and when I try to do it online, it's trying to charge me a fee for a preferred seat as a SE on a Flex fare, when there should be no charge. I can do these easily via the UA app when traveling on UA metal, but I find most of my calls to AC are things like that where AC's app or website doesn't work.
gcashin is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 1:38 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,850
Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
My expectations of AC is as tiny as their 17 inch Y seat.
Man, you're going to have a rough time when you get to your third or fourth airline, and realize this is either common or universal on DH8s, Q400s, virtually every 737 flying, and a lot of E145/175/190/195s.

May I also suggest that for your happiness, you avoid such comparably awful, third-rate airlines as Air France, British, Delta, Eva, Emirates, KLM, LOT, Lufthansa, Turkish and Qantas?
YOWgary is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 1:40 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: Only J via Peasant Points, 777HDPeasant or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance and Narcissism.
Posts: 6,006
Originally Posted by YOWgary
Man, you're going to have a rough time when you get to your third or fourth airline, and realize this is either common or universal on DH8s, Q400s, virtually every 737 flying, and a lot of E145/175/190/195s.

May I also suggest that for your happiness, you avoid such comparably awful, third-rate airlines as Air France, British, Delta, Eva, Emirates, KLM, LOT, Lufthansa, Turkish and Qantas?
Oh come on Gary
That was seriously just a joke.. or an ultra fail attempt of a joke judging by your response :P

I already accepted 10 Abreast Y for what it is. If it allows for people to travel cheaply and facilitate movement of people and goods at a ultra low price, I guess its fine.
The problem as evidenced by this thread regarding Call center wait time is that despite so much capacity is added, AC did not increase the necessary resources in place to meet that extra capacity.

Last edited by Jumper Jack; Sep 13, 2016 at 1:50 pm
Jumper Jack is online now  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 1:47 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: YUL
Programs: Skymiles Silver Medallion
Posts: 955
The problem is that AC sees its call centre issues as being separate from its IT issues. When, as you've all correctly pointed out, they're related.

I daresay many if not most calls to the call centre are for things that we SHOULD be able to do online, if a competent tech team were in place at AC. Nobody wants to have to phone and spend hours on hold and pay fees to do things like change or cancel a booking, get seat assignments, track lost baggage, request a special service or meal, rebook in the case of IRROPS, or the other dozen run-of-the-mill scenarios that happen a thousand times a day.

The call centre should exist to deal with exceptions only. Then the call volume would be much lower and the wait times would be reasonable. Plus, it would save the company lots of money, and passengers lots of frustration.

But as long as the website is a massive ball of fail, we can expect the call centre wait times to only get worse, not better.
segacs is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 1:52 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: Only J via Peasant Points, 777HDPeasant or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance and Narcissism.
Posts: 6,006
Originally Posted by segacs
The problem is that AC sees its call centre issues as being separate from its IT issues. When, as you've all correctly pointed out, they're related.
As demonstrated by accurate representation of cross departmental(Silos) teamwork at AC
Jumper Jack is online now  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 2:18 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,850
Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
Oh come on Gary
That was seriously just a joke.. or an ultra fail attempt of a joke judging by your response :P

I already accepted 10 Abreast Y for what it is.
Stop turning Every. Single. Thread. into a complaint about your two flights on an HD 777 and you'll never hear another peep from me on the subject.

Stop comparing the HD to products you've never flown, on AC or otherwise, and I'll be quieter than Donald Trump's tax accountant.

The most useful FT discussions come from users comparing first-hand experiences. If you don't have many, there's nothing wrong with that, but trying to turn everything back into the one complaint you DO have isn't working out for anyone. It's not "a joke that missed", it's not that we continually "misunderstand".

Now...

Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
The problem as evidenced by this thread regarding Call center wait time is that despite so much capacity is added, AC did not increase the necessary resources in place to meet that extra capacity.
That's the symptom, not the disease.

It's accurate that AC haven't increased their customer-service capacity, but the larger issue is that they've demonstrated over time that *this is the way they want it*.

United, Delta and AA have all executed massive mergers in the last decade, and yet manage to field customer-service departments that outperform the much-smaller AC, while AC still seem to be struggling to catch up to where they needed to be ten years ago.

I can't get Air Canada on the phone if I call from Hong Kong at 4 PM local, but I can get Cathay, SAS, Swiss and Turkish on the phone when calling from Toronto at 4 PM. As noted above, if I want to get UA on the phone, I need to set aside as many as ten whole minutes.

This shouldn't be a hard one to fix.

Air Canada continually choose not to put effort into increasing the service capacity of their call centres (and as organizational changes go, "hire more call centre drones" is not a huge disruption). Expansion is barely relevant, since they can't staff the volume they've already got, but looking at profitability over the last several quarters, they're not exactly strapped for cash.

The logical conclusion from this is that they've decided they can make money without delivering better results, so that's the strategy they're running with.

Last edited by YOWgary; Sep 13, 2016 at 6:27 pm Reason: Changed typo "barely elevant" to "barely relevant"
YOWgary is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 5:41 pm
  #67  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Programs: Aeroplan E50/MM, HH gold, Nat Exec Elite, Kimpton Karma
Posts: 2,383
Smile

Originally Posted by canadiancow
Imagine if you could do most reasonable things online.

I'dw never have to call in.

For example, the majority (well over 50%) of my calls to the concierge line are for same day changes.

Reservations is to handle schedule changes, select seats, get partner booking references, etc.

As a result, by improving the website, they could reduce hold times.
Isn't that what they just did?
Bartolo is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 6:21 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,850
Originally Posted by montezume
Reminds me of how big I thought the Mona Lisa was, since by expectations going in were that it was tiny.
YOWgary is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 7:02 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ottawa
Programs: AC MM SE; SPG Plat; Hilton Gold
Posts: 247
This is an interesting thread for me. I have been super elite forever but decided not to bother for next year given the new $20,000 spend requirement.

As a super elite my calls were almost always answered immediately, to the point that I never bothered tracking time.

One of my concerns going forward has been having to hold forever once I lose super elite status. I am 1 million miler so will retain the 50,000 level for life. I have been told by AC agents when I call in that my waiting At the 50,000 mile level should not be much longer than super elite. I have been sceptical about that, but this thread gives me hope.

We will see.

Since I no longer worried about accumulating Air Canada miles this year, I have flown a number of WestJet flights. I was amazed at how quick my WestJet calls were answered and if it was not quick the ability to have them call me back was a great innovation. I do not know why others like Air Canada do not also offer this option.
ramsfan is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 8:04 pm
  #70  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Montreal
Posts: 260
Originally Posted by canadiancow
Woooooow.

I hate AC's new phone crap.

The slow-talking English+French garbage, plus the WE ARE EXPERIENCING HIGHER THAN NORMAL CALL VOLUMES.

It was about 60 seconds before I could make my first selection.
That higher than normal call volumes crap...

Sometimes with other companies I get an agent right after hearing that line. It's clearly a switch set to ON and has no off position.
nihonto is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 8:12 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,850
Originally Posted by ramsfan
I was amazed at how quick my WestJet calls were answered and if it was not quick the ability to have them call me back was a great innovation. I do not know why others like Air Canada do not also offer this option.
They do - but in typical fashion, it's wildly inconsistent. I've had it offered on hold times of 10-15 minutes, and not offered on hold times of 90 minutes plus.
YOWgary is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 9:23 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Spatially speaking or metaphysically speaking?
Programs: Aeropain: Zirconia Status; Altitude: Marianas Trench Status; UA MP: 1 Kick to the curb status
Posts: 623
Originally Posted by nihonto
That higher than normal call volumes crap...

Sometimes with other companies I get an agent right after hearing that line. It's clearly a switch set to ON and has no off position.
Attached Images  
Marlin240 is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 8:38 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 2,344
Originally Posted by Bartolo
Isn't that what they just did?
They made the website look different. I haven't seen any changes to functionality.

It still won't allow me to change seats on a travel agent booking. It sometimes tries to charge me for preferred seats as a SE (in error). For reservations including partner flights, it doesn't show the partner booking reference. For schedule changes where it creates a longer connection/potential misconnect, you can't change anything online. All these are items that can be done online or via the app with many airlines.

So I don't think their website facelift addressed any of the issues that Cow or I were referring to.
gcashin is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 9:05 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Programs: Aeroplan E50/MM, HH gold, Nat Exec Elite, Kimpton Karma
Posts: 2,383
My sarcasm wasn't obvious, I guess.
Bartolo is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 9:34 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,711
I called Rogers today to make a change to my account. At 10:46 I was told that the current hold times are between 16 and 22 minutes and was offered the choice of an automated call back when I was next in line. I opted for the call back and received that call at 11:02.

16 minutes. Precisely.

It's all about managing expectations.
ffsim is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.