Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Stranded in YYT for 24 hours - passenger rights?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Stranded in YYT for 24 hours - passenger rights?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2016, 8:34 pm
  #16  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 360
Originally Posted by eigenvector
Use TripCase or TripIt Pro, mobile apps which once you load your itinerary (by forwarding the email confirmation) will show you nearly all alternate possibilities in one tap.
Thank you, I will look at downloading either of those.
AllTheNines is offline  
Old May 22, 2016, 8:53 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,923
The unfortunate reality is that your spouse received reasonable compensation by Canadian standards. As as far as the Canadian airline industry is concerned, Canadians neither need consumer protection laws, nor merit them since the Canadian airline industry "takes care" of its passengers. Not one political party has adopted a position which supports rights similar to what one sees in the EU or the USA. The day Canada adopts such protections is the day that most of its smaller airlines will be forced to close their operations and the day Air Canada starts bleeding money as its operational strategy is predicated on overbooking, and flight delays.

The SOP of Air Canada when there is a need to rebook multiple pax is to tell the pax to call the AC reservation line. Little effort is made to assist pax at the airport, particularly at those airports where there is inadequate personnel to process the large volume of pax. The logic is to focus the personnel on securing the food and lodging vouchers and arranging lodging, and attending to special needs pax first, rather than to use the scare resource of personnel to rebook customers. On paper it works fine. When put to the test of a major disruption, it has been an abject failure. Air Canada was supposed to have rolled out a new approach to these types of events because of some very public failures. As I have significantly curtailed my use of AC, I have not had an opportunity to compare the new approach to the incompetence of previous flight disruptions that I have experienced, so I don't know if the new strategy is better.

In any case, welcome to Canada, where the airlines benefit from toothless regulation.
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old May 22, 2016, 9:56 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: Bottom feeder Star Gold
Posts: 2,652
Originally Posted by Admiral Ackbar
Aah, the Aeroplan forum at its best in greeting a newcomer and not reading any posts but their own, par for the course!

The OP never even implied that he was seeking EU compensation, he was MERELY asking if there was anything comparable in Canada. He was informed there was not, that's it, that's all. Don't know what all the rest of the posts are going on about, reading comprehension for the win!
Thanks Admiral, for voicing my thoughts exactly. The chief reason I departed this forum - and return only sporadically - is mainly due to the combative nature of several members, and their eagerness to argue, discount or criticize the experiences and opinions of others. There are a couple of remarkably unfriendly replies to the OP, and a few people have chimed in with irrelevant responses to what they wanted to read rather than what was actually written.

AllTheNines, sorry to hear your sig other's travel delay was compounded by the persistent inability of most AC ground staff to accommodate their customers. You'd think the concept of an airplane stranding its load of passengers is an utterly new one, and while the airline may not be on the hook for compensating passengers, the very least they could do is ensure the disruption is made as smooth as possible. How they don't have polished contingency plans in place is beyond me.

Best of luck receiving a meaningful outcome, and I'm sure this experience will remind you there are plenty of alternative options before booking your next flight to or from Canada.
CZAMFlyer is offline  
Old May 22, 2016, 10:13 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: Only J via Peasant Points, 777HDPeasant or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance and Narcissism.
Posts: 5,955
You know, if its any consolation,at least she didn't sleep on the ground and ate plain white bread like other poor Y peasants at NRT...
Jumper Jack is online now  
Old May 22, 2016, 10:29 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,197
You lost the sympathy of this thread early into your post. Most who fly AC in Y would be pinching themselves in disbelief if they got a) a free hotel b) $22 in food -- lots and lots of Timbits and c) proactive flight cancellation without having to sit for hours on the plane before it was cancelled.

if you want what 'not everyone will get' prize you NEED to be aware of the routing you want. You don't just ask the airline employee 'any other way to get her there'. I am sure this is a VERY GOOD thing for folks who can take the initiative... If they offered a diffent airline etc too easily, statistically space STILL would have run out long before they got to your wife in line or on the phone queue.

It sounds like, up to a point in time, a simple check on google flights would have gotten you a cheap price on another carrier. That plus a refund of your cancelled AC flight may have been a wash overall financially.

If I am ever stuck overnight I insist that I spend the night back at the carrier's 'hub' city. As I have told Souhwest (in the US), I would rather be in your hub city, on standby, where they have 9 nonstops a day to my destination than where I am, waiting 24hrs for a once a day flight. (Someone always sleeps in too long and misses the earliest flights, or has a delay and can't make their connection). As a bonus, if I do this I always receive a MUCH nicer hotel.... Because agents have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for hotel rooms for 200-200 people in a smaller city.

Last edited by expert7700; May 22, 2016 at 10:40 pm
expert7700 is online now  
Old May 22, 2016, 10:31 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: OZ Diamond, Jiffypark Manhattan Gold
Posts: 4,485
Travel insurance?
drvannostren is offline  
Old May 22, 2016, 10:35 pm
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,690
Cool

Originally Posted by AllTheNines
I beg to differ. I was left stuck overnight in DUS last year with Air Berlin due to issues "outside of the airline's control" and still got granted the entire 250 EUR per pax (eventhough the ticket only cost about 50 EUR!).

A judge in the UK also ruled recently that bird strikes do count http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/ne...n-judge-rules/.

I don't agree that a birdstrike warrants this much compensation. I'm a commercial pilot so fully understand the safety implications of dispatching with a defective aircraft. But if there was something more available for her, then why not come on here and ask? If anyone could give me a straight answer, it should be the regulars who are au fait with Air Canada and passenger rights in Canada for that matter.


Interesting legal case. I disagree with the judge's "reasoning," as it seems he was just being cute, at least to me. It's hard to see how an airline could be held liable for a random occurrence of nature. Next thing you know, some judge will say a plane damaged by lightning and thus delayed leads to the airline being held liable for delay. But all this is a bit off topic, so I'll end here.
Doc Savage is offline  
Old May 22, 2016, 10:48 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,197
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
Interesting legal case. I disagree with the judge's "reasoning," as it seems he was just being cute, at least to me. It's hard to see how an airline could be held liable for a random occurrence of nature. Next thing you know, some judge will say a plane damaged by lightning and thus delayed leads to the airline being held liable for delay. But all this is a bit off topic, so I'll end here.
Doc, things are different in Europe! Lightning strike absolutely would get you EU compensation because the airline could potentially have alternate equipment at or near that location, standby flight crews to avoid timing out, etc. Rare mechanical failure of widget #1730 on the plane?? Airline pays EU comp (because, well, the airline COULD have proactively replaced this and every other part on the airplane before it showed even a single symptom!).

In Sweden, if the train is more than a few minutes late arriving you get your next roundtrip train ticket free. If it is something like 20+ minutes late arriving you are reimbursed something crazy like $1,500.00 for any Airline rebooking incurred.
expert7700 is online now  
Old May 22, 2016, 11:26 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,805
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
Interesting legal case. I disagree with the judge's "reasoning," as it seems he was just being cute, at least to me. It's hard to see how an airline could be held liable for a random occurrence of nature. Next thing you know, some judge will say a plane damaged by lightning and thus delayed leads to the airline being held liable for delay. But all this is a bit off topic, so I'll end here.
Bottom line, you are wrong and the EU rules are quite clear. Airlines were trying to weasel out of what the intent of the law had been in the first place.

I wish there would be similar rules in North America, but there aren't. So it's the race to the bottom. Tariffs only require them to get you there, period. When, how, does not matter.
Stranger is offline  
Old May 22, 2016, 11:34 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,923
Folks, the gentleman was citing a case in St John's NL wasn't he? The question was whether or not he received compensation in line with what is accorded under Canadian regulations. It's wonderful that the EU has laws that protect its citizens. It's fantastic that the USA does too. Unfortunately, none of that was germane. We are screwed in Canada because the airline sector has blocked any and all attempts to extend protections to consumers. He should count his blessings and not waste anymore time on the issue as AC isn't going to give anything else, except one of its crappy discounts that really are not much of a discount.

As was pointed out, his spouse did better than most Canadians. One need only consider the plight of the thousands of Sun Wing customers every year who are delayed, or subject to cancellation and get a microwaved pizza slice and a discount coupon for another Sun Wing "vacation" (apparently some people like the abuse) to see that AC is somewhat more generous. Hectoring the poor chap isn't helping matters. He can't rescind his purchase.
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old May 23, 2016, 6:27 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75 / Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 952
It is rough to have to tough it out for 24 hours off track, but really is a part of flying. If they refused a hotel or re-booking to another route you asked for then I think you'd have further grounds for argument, but not sure there's much else they could do. When delays hit, my view is the costs should be largely offset by the airline, but not a fan of big compensation when it's really a crappy situation for both the airline and passengers. It's not like an airline tries to hit a bird, go mechanical, run into weather issues, etc.

A great opportunity to go see some of YYT is another way to look at it.
YZF_Elite is offline  
Old May 23, 2016, 9:39 am
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
I agree a $22 voucher is not much. But on short notice, I'd also suggest that the YYT staff were faced with a major cancellation and had to scramble to know what central ops was planning. In such circumstances, the local station cannot respond to rebooking requests until or if ops advises. That's what ops is there for. It is their responsibility to handle rebookings and they have a staff to do that. The local station would have been scrambling to find enough hotel rooms for 125+ passengers in a relatively small city like St. John's. In my experiences with AC and cancelled flights in such circumstances, those hotel arrangements include meals and if possible, transport to the hotel. This is to keep track on passengers and be able to marshal them for the rescheduled flight.

The overriding thing to learn is always buy your ticket with a credit card that offers trip interruption insurance (to cover costs airlines don't, or won't) or the insurance offered at time of booking. Otherwise, your only protection is what the airline offers and/or local consumer coverage. I personally think the EU has been over-generous, but certainly feel in the minority around here.
Shareholder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.