Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Giving up the Chase for Altitude Status

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Giving up the Chase for Altitude Status

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2015, 8:42 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: BGI (ex-YYC, YYZ)
Programs: AC*G-E100K (once again)
Posts: 1,703
Originally Posted by yvrgary
...how much is each tier of Altitude status worth to you?
I don't value the eupgrades as much as I value IKK and SQ free redemptions. I also value worldwide lounge access. You chase for E50K or SE100K or you don't chase at all.
cooleddie is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 10:29 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Dusit
Posts: 2,933
I stopped worrying about status last year. Like a large number of customers, status gives me nothing that I want or need.

1. I much prefer the cost savings of $1,000 to $2,000 on my long hauls provided by alternative carriers to AC. KLM/AF/DL/CX have their strengths and weaknesses when compared to AC, but the cost savings are so good, that the AC FF points are worthless in comparison. It looks like a win-win situation. AC gets my space to sell to someone who doesn't care or doesn't know any better, and I give my business to a company that seems to want my business.

2. I fly business when on a long haul, so the lounge access, check-in and baggage benefits are already extended.

2. On my short haul domestics, I have had bad experience when using upgrades, so I stopped worrying about the fare class. I don't care if I am in J for flights under 3 hours. AC domestic J and the lounges are nothing special. Paid Domestic J is not a good value proposition.

3. West Jet and Porter are lovely alternatives to AC on my domestic routes and I like the savings. However, I am starting to prefer the AC option out of Billy Bishop now. The empty seats are a nice alternative to the packed Porter flights.

I expect that I am not alone. AC works for some people and that's wonderful. AC can take its sham FF status, its Rouge, its dismal F&B and cabin ambience, its miserable employees and its arrogant management and keep chasing the low end demographic. Folks like me will go where we are wanted and appreciated. AC and its FT fans can say goodbye and good riddance to people like me. Meanwhile, I'll keep the after tax $5,000+ savings per annum in airfare (12 months to date).

Last edited by Transpacificflyer; Aug 16, 2015 at 10:40 am
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 10:31 am
  #18  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE*2MM. SPG Plat life
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by cooleddie
I don't value the eupgrades as much as I value IKK and SQ free redemptions. I also value worldwide lounge access. You chase for E50K or SE100K or you don't chase at all.
I have never chased status, but I would agree, these 2 bench marks are the most important.
Wpgjetse is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 10:39 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: YYG
Programs: airlines and hotels and rental cars - oh my!
Posts: 3,013
Could not care less about status. Whatever legitimate perks you lose (like lounge access) you can easily replace with a credit card. Fly with whoever's cheapest and you save more than enough mney to offset those "valuable" Errorplan miles, which are worth basically nothing anyway.
Symmetre is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 10:45 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
I no longer 'chase' status as I always make SE without trying.

That being said I do now go out of my way to credit to Qatar and a few others. My locked thread on it no longer being worth it to credit to AC past 100k explains it all.
Dorian is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 10:46 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
Originally Posted by KenHamer
Not yanked, but gently pulled, as he's doing it himself.
Ya, like he's sitting in the CEO's office asking every stat on demand to post here.
Dorian is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 11:10 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: YYC
Posts: 4,035
Originally Posted by yvrgary
This brings up an interesting question - mods, I couldn't decide whether this needed its own thread.

...how much is each tier of Altitude status worth to you?
25K - $300
35K - $500
50K - $800
75K - $1200
SE - $5000 min

This year as SE:
- YYC-Europe x5 PE->J upgrades = min $500 value per
- NA upgrades x6 Y->J upgrade = $200-500 value per, depending on fare class
- 100K bonus miles = $2,000 value
- YYC-Europe x3 r/t No YQ = $2,400 cash savings (entire family to Paris for Christmas)
- Concierge help on many, many occasions
- Miles earned via CC (400K+ / year) are worth at least twice as much due to IKK

There are many SE who won't get the same benefits from it that I do. A large part of it for me is the increased value of CC miles due to IKK seat availability, combined with the no YQ. Alone, those make SE worth it to me. Add is the flight benefits and it's a no brainer. But if I didn't have that level of CC earning and a family to use the IKK/No YQ on, it would be a much harder value proposition.

Last edited by rehoult; Aug 16, 2015 at 11:16 am Reason: Grammar
rehoult is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 11:25 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Honors Diamond. Priority Club Platinum. Emerald Club Executive Elite
Posts: 446
Stopped chasing Aeroplan/AC status altogether.

0 AC flight miles earned in 2015
0 flight segments credited to AC in 2015
(I think I'm silver with AE credit card spend.....whatever...)

From SE to a Kettle in relatively short order.

I did value SE status. What I liked: priority lines, upgrades, lounge access. I appreciated the other benefits but rarely used them.

What I learned this year is how much I don't miss YYZ and YUL. I'm not dissin' YYZ or YUL, but when chasing AC status from YOW, there are going to be a lot of connections; especially considering most of my flights are into the US. Flying to and from YOW always meant a second round of security screening when the connection city was YYZ or YUL then into the US. Quite often, another connection might be required as well. Arriving into YOW, passing through Customs/Immigration is a breeze over YYZ/YUL

What I prefer over AC Status is now is I fly out of YOW to one of several US hubs, then connect if necessary. Yes, I've got *Gold with UA now. Might even make 1K.

AC status was fine when I thought it was convenient. I've learned now the cost of attaining status when based from outside an AC hub requires far more effort and time than I was prepared to give them.

Last edited by nowinyow; Aug 16, 2015 at 11:42 am
nowinyow is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 11:42 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: WS Nothing, AC Something, AS Gold. Too big for 737Max washrooms
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by Transpacificflyer
I stopped worrying about status last year. Like a large number of customers, status gives me nothing that I want or need.

1. I much prefer the cost savings of $1,000 to $2,000 on my long hauls provided by alternative carriers to AC. KLM/AF/DL/CX have their strengths and weaknesses when compared to AC, but the cost savings are so good, that the AC FF points are worthless in comparison. It looks like a win-win situation. AC gets my space to sell to someone who doesn't care or doesn't know any better, and I give my business to a company that seems to want my business.

2. I fly business when on a long haul, so the lounge access, check-in and baggage benefits are already extended.

2. On my short haul domestics, I have had bad experience when using upgrades, so I stopped worrying about the fare class. I don't care if I am in J for flights under 3 hours. AC domestic J and the lounges are nothing special. Paid Domestic J is not a good value proposition.

3. West Jet and Porter are lovely alternatives to AC on my domestic routes and I like the savings. However, I am starting to prefer the AC option out of Billy Bishop now. The empty seats are a nice alternative to the packed Porter flights.

I expect that I am not alone. AC works for some people and that's wonderful. AC can take its sham FF status, its Rouge, its dismal F&B and cabin ambience, its miserable employees and its arrogant management and keep chasing the low end demographic. Folks like me will go where we are wanted and appreciated. AC and its FT fans can say goodbye and good riddance to people like me. Meanwhile, I'll keep the after tax $5,000+ savings per annum in airfare (12 months to date).
Yup! You are indeed not alone. After MANY years of SE, I took my $$ elsewhere this year and won't make even minimum status on AC. Metal requirements were the initial driver for me to make the switch and I found that the dark (i.e. non-AC) side is in fact the easier path. Spreadsheet is telling me that I've saved (my clients) $4300 thus far this year by making the switch away from AC - based on cost per distance.
Frequentlander is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 12:06 pm
  #25  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE*2MM. SPG Plat life
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by Symmetre
Could not care less about status. Whatever legitimate perks you lose (like lounge access) you can easily replace with a credit card. Fly with whoever's cheapest and you save more than enough mney to offset those "valuable" Errorplan miles, which are worth basically nothing anyway.
I would disagree with you if you don't have to chase status. CC don't help in bad weather, but status does. Being SE, Aeroplan miles have great value.
Wpgjetse is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 12:10 pm
  #26  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE*2MM. SPG Plat life
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by Frequentlander
Yup! You are indeed not alone. After MANY years of SE, I took my $$ elsewhere this year and won't make even minimum status on AC. Metal requirements were the initial driver for me to make the switch and I found that the dark (i.e. non-AC) side is in fact the easier path. Spreadsheet is telling me that I've saved (my clients) $4300 thus far this year by making the switch away from AC - based on cost per distance.
How did you save your clients $4300, if you were mostly flying non AC metal. You said yourself, AC metal requirements were the main reason for leaving aeroplan/altitude.
Wpgjetse is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 2:58 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YVR - Vancouver, with most winter weekends in Whistler.
Programs: Aeroplan 35K, Alaska MVP, Marriott Titanium / Lifetime Platinum, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 4,612
Left last year and no looking back.

It's pretty easy to get business class for personal travel using a buy miles method or an aeroplan branded credit card and I've just sucked it up for business trips in economy.

Frankly, I'm happier.
worldtraveller73 is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2015, 3:25 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: WS Nothing, AC Something, AS Gold. Too big for 737Max washrooms
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by Wpgjetse
How did you save your clients $4300, if you were mostly flying non AC metal. You said yourself, AC metal requirements were the main reason for leaving aeroplan/altitude.
By flying other (less expensive) non *A carriers......in another FF program. ie actively not flying AC.

Last edited by Frequentlander; Aug 16, 2015 at 3:33 pm Reason: Clarity - typos.
Frequentlander is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2015, 2:23 am
  #29  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
Originally Posted by rehoult
25K - $300
35K - $500
50K - $800
75K - $1200
SE - $5000 min

This year as SE:
- YYC-Europe x5 PE->J upgrades = min $500 value per
- NA upgrades x6 Y->J upgrade = $200-500 value per, depending on fare class
- 100K bonus miles = $2,000 value
- YYC-Europe x3 r/t No YQ = $2,400 cash savings (entire family to Paris for Christmas)
- Concierge help on many, many occasions
- Miles earned via CC (400K+ / year) are worth at least twice as much due to IKK

There are many SE who won't get the same benefits from it that I do. A large part of it for me is the increased value of CC miles due to IKK seat availability, combined with the no YQ. Alone, those make SE worth it to me. Add is the flight benefits and it's a no brainer. But if I didn't have that level of CC earning and a family to use the IKK/No YQ on, it would be a much harder value proposition.
For me the magic number was always $10,000. And in 2008 I put that to the test.

In early December 2008 I was stuck at about 60K miles, after having taken a 5 month holiday earlier in the year. So I did the obvious thing... and went on a 40K mileage run.

The total cost was over $9000, and I travelled in J the entire way. I also turned it into a mini-holiday in SYD, AKL, and LAX. But the real, primary reason was always SE status.

Sometime later I proposed a scheme where Air Canada could make pure profit on those of us who would do mileage runs to maintain status: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...hitchcock.html
KenHamer is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2015, 5:46 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: YYG
Programs: airlines and hotels and rental cars - oh my!
Posts: 3,013
Originally Posted by Wpgjetse
I would disagree with you if you don't have to chase status. CC don't help in bad weather, but status does. Being SE, Aeroplan miles have great value.
My status with multiple hotels chains means I can wait out the occasional weather delay in relative comfort. So perhaps status does count there. But that has nothing to do with AC.

And let's be honest, Aeroplan miles will never have as much value as cash in the hand.
Symmetre is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.