Community
Wiki Posts
Search

JNB and NBO in the works?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2014, 1:26 pm
  #76  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: WS Nothing, AC Something, AS Gold. Too big for 737Max washrooms
Posts: 893
Originally Posted by Badenoch
Having done JFK-JNB three times in the last three years the prospect of YYZ-JNB creates a personal dilemma. It means having to decide on the convenience of leaving from Toronto and a 15-16 hour flight in a pod with typical AC food and service versus SAA business class with a nicer lie flat bed, better food and most excellent South African wines and port.
Or put another way...No dilemma at all. SAA would seem to be the preferred option.

Last edited by Frequentlander; Dec 21, 2014 at 1:27 pm Reason: Typo
Frequentlander is offline  
Old Dec 21, 2014, 2:32 pm
  #77  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: BGI (ex-YYC, YYZ)
Programs: AC*G-E100K (once again)
Posts: 1,701
Originally Posted by Frequentlander
Or put another way...No dilemma at all. SAA would seem to be the preferred option.
Even though the SAA food, offerings and service is fantastic, I'd rather fly YYZ-LHR-JNB instead of YYZ-IAD/JFK-JNB because:-

1) You can earn more AC AQM, which is now required to maintain status (50% minimum requirement). If you go from IAD/JFK you lose a huge chunk of AC miles as the majority of miles from your trip would be SA miles.

2) Skip the border - no need to go through the US border. Big selling point. It's a reason why I don't want to fly via Atlanta on Delta or any US city.

3) Opportunity to exit the airport at LHR and meet people for lunch, etc.

Also I prefer AC's new 787 pods vs. SA's business class seats. However, SA business class seats are better than AC's old pods.
cooleddie is offline  
Old Dec 21, 2014, 3:06 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: BGI (ex-YYC, YYZ)
Programs: AC*G-E100K (once again)
Posts: 1,701
Originally Posted by jcamp028
Hard to understand how London and Beijing could be loss leaders, yet YYZ would be profitable.
1) Not surprised that London is a loss leader for SAA due to the huge competition on LHR-JNB route, which has more seats than LHR-YYZ!

Just looking at direct flights between LHR and JNB (BA, VS and SA):
BA A380 : 469
BA B747 : 345
VS A346 : 316
SA A343 : 254
SA A332 : 222
Total daily seats (direct) : 1606

And as a comparison, LHR and YYZ (BA and AC only):
BA B788 : 214
BA B777 : 224
AC B767 : 211
AC A333 : 265
AC B773 : 349
AC B788 : 251
Total daily seats (direct) 1514

Simply a lot of competition.

2) I heard PEK was losing money because they got a bad time/ landing slot which basically misses the majority of the connections. The flight from JNB to PEK (SA288) arrives at 5:05PM in PEK.... so they lose morning and afternoon connections already.
cooleddie is offline  
Old Dec 21, 2014, 4:04 pm
  #79  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Never home.
Posts: 2,971
Originally Posted by cooleddie
1) Not surprised that London is a loss leader for SAA due to the huge competition on LHR-JNB route, which has more seats than LHR-YYZ!
Depends on the season and likely specific days. Not sure VS provides huge competition either... overall 5 flights vs. YYZ's 6-7.

June 10 (my random choice)
LHR-JNB
SA 332 - 222
SA 332 - 222
BA 380 - 469
BA 744 - 345
VS 346 - 316
Total n/s seats = 1574

YYZ-LHR
BA 788 - 214
BA 744 - 345
AC 763 - 211
AC 77W - 349
AC 77W - 349
AC 77W - 349
Total n/s seats = 1817

(BA operates a 3rd YYZLHR 777 frequency some days bringing it up to 2041 seats)

If LHR-JNB was such a loss making flight for SA... what's the point of having 2 flights departing within 2 hours of each other? Not much connection benefit there.
winnipegrev is offline  
Old Dec 21, 2014, 5:04 pm
  #80  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-EP, TK-*G, HL-DM, HY-GLO, MR-LTP
Posts: 25,932
Originally Posted by Frequentlander
Or put another way...No dilemma at all. SAA would seem to be the preferred option.
The other best option would be TK !
Now why would you take AC over say TK, SA or even LH?
Guy Betsy is offline  
Old Dec 21, 2014, 5:05 pm
  #81  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YOW
Programs: TK*S, SPG Gold
Posts: 714
Originally Posted by cooleddie
1) Not surprised that London is a loss leader for SAA due to the huge competition on LHR-JNB route, which has more seats than LHR-YYZ!

Just looking at direct flights between LHR and JNB (BA, VS and SA):
BA A380 : 469
BA B747 : 345
VS A346 : 316
SA A343 : 254
SA A332 : 222
Total daily seats (direct) : 1606

And as a comparison, LHR and YYZ (BA and AC only):
BA B788 : 214
BA B777 : 224
AC B767 : 211
AC A333 : 265
AC B773 : 349
AC B788 : 251
Total daily seats (direct) 1514

Simply a lot of competition.

2) I heard PEK was losing money because they got a bad time/ landing slot which basically misses the majority of the connections. The flight from JNB to PEK (SA288) arrives at 5:05PM in PEK.... so they lose morning and afternoon connections already.
Still the only Star Alliance option, right?
jcamp028 is offline  
Old Dec 21, 2014, 5:09 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: BGI (ex-YYC, YYZ)
Programs: AC*G-E100K (once again)
Posts: 1,701
Originally Posted by winnipegrev
If LHR-JNB was such a loss making flight for SA... what's the point of having 2 flights departing within 2 hours of each other? Not much connection benefit there.

Not sure, but I've been on a LHR-JNB flight by SA where economy was only like 50% full.

SAA has been known to keep planes flying on routes even if not full / loss making. There's a lot of political pressure for them to do so. Many examples of that:
- http://www.bdlive.co.za/business/tra...ends-argentina
cooleddie is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2014, 5:17 am
  #83  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
Originally Posted by cooleddie
Even though the SAA food, offerings and service is fantastic, I'd rather fly YYZ-LHR-JNB instead of YYZ-IAD/JFK-JNB because:-

1) You can earn more AC AQM, which is now required to maintain status (50% minimum requirement). If you go from IAD/JFK you lose a huge chunk of AC miles as the majority of miles from your trip would be SA miles.

2) Skip the border - no need to go through the US border. Big selling point. It's a reason why I don't want to fly via Atlanta on Delta or any US city.

3) Opportunity to exit the airport at LHR and meet people for lunch, etc.

Also I prefer AC's new 787 pods vs. SA's business class seats. However, SA business class seats are better than AC's old pods.
Not going through the US border is definitely a plus but on a business trip going via NYC gets me there faster
Badenoch is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2014, 8:14 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 5,813
Originally Posted by jcamp028
Hard to understand how London and Beijing could be loss leaders, yet YYZ would be profitable.
Originally Posted by Swarez
Only thing I can think of is London has lots of flights a day, plus additional flights to Europe.
A bloated, inefficient SAA can (and does) lose money all over their network.
Originally Posted by The Lev
It might just have the range to go YYZ-JNB, but I suspect a technical stop would be required to fly JNB-YYZ.
Agree.
SAA serving YYZ is a very long shot in my opinion.
SAA serving YYZ nonstop while electing to tech stop enroute to NYC and IAD would be absurd.
CloudsBelow is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.