More classes move from flex to tango
#76
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,519
I admit that I didn't read every single post on this thread (yet)... so maybe someone already made the same comment... but does anyone else actually think AC made a wrong move on the timing on this new fare rearrangment?
I mean, they did it on the same day where everyone (who care about) is waiting for the info on the EYW info, so many have "hold-off" on booking any flights for the last week or so... i.e. lost revenue to them...
then before they provide the detail badge info on EYW, they annouce this first... which piss a lot of people, as we can see, along with the new rules with special badges on EYW, anyone that have choice and were "thinking" if they should book AC, will most likely book elsewhere... i.e. lost revenue to them again...
and anyone that do all the detail calculation on whether to go for EYW or not will now need to re-calulate and realized, they can only book in Tango (as Flex is now really too experience for MR).. so lost 50% of AQM for those non CDN flights.. that calculation would end up "don't go for EYW".. so another lost revenue to them again...
MR for status... Q4 being the busiest time for MR.. but for those who were still thinking doing MR to get the status might now (finally) decided "forget about it".. so lost revenue again and again
So, my conclusion is only that AC will lost revenue... period... I think if AC mgmt really having someone monitor FlyerTalk should report this to the AC mgmt to fire that maketing lead to choose the timing of releasing the info. They can still go ahead with this move, it is a business afterall, but the timing is still very bad on their end.. and they just let all of those, like myselef, who were undecided to just keep those money in our pocket.
I mean, they did it on the same day where everyone (who care about) is waiting for the info on the EYW info, so many have "hold-off" on booking any flights for the last week or so... i.e. lost revenue to them...
then before they provide the detail badge info on EYW, they annouce this first... which piss a lot of people, as we can see, along with the new rules with special badges on EYW, anyone that have choice and were "thinking" if they should book AC, will most likely book elsewhere... i.e. lost revenue to them again...
and anyone that do all the detail calculation on whether to go for EYW or not will now need to re-calulate and realized, they can only book in Tango (as Flex is now really too experience for MR).. so lost 50% of AQM for those non CDN flights.. that calculation would end up "don't go for EYW".. so another lost revenue to them again...
MR for status... Q4 being the busiest time for MR.. but for those who were still thinking doing MR to get the status might now (finally) decided "forget about it".. so lost revenue again and again
So, my conclusion is only that AC will lost revenue... period... I think if AC mgmt really having someone monitor FlyerTalk should report this to the AC mgmt to fire that maketing lead to choose the timing of releasing the info. They can still go ahead with this move, it is a business afterall, but the timing is still very bad on their end.. and they just let all of those, like myselef, who were undecided to just keep those money in our pocket.
#77
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YVR - Vancouver, with most winter weekends in Whistler.
Programs: Aeroplan 35K, Alaska MVP, Marriott Titanium / Lifetime Platinum, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 4,609
Amazing that I get "Shock and awed" by web saver emails by AC on a weekly basis but then they sneak this one in there with a tiny hyperlink on their main page.
+1 for the not impressed.
+1 for the not impressed.
#78
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
I admit that I didn't read every single post on this thread (yet)... so maybe someone already made the same comment... but does anyone else actually think AC made a wrong move on the timing on this new fare rearrangment?
I mean, they did it on the same day where everyone (who care about) is waiting for the info on the EYW info, so many have "hold-off" on booking any flights for the last week or so... i.e. lost revenue to them...
then before they provide the detail badge info on EYW, they annouce this first... which piss a lot of people, as we can see, along with the new rules with special badges on EYW, anyone that have choice and were "thinking" if they should book AC, will most likely book elsewhere... i.e. lost revenue to them again...
and anyone that do all the detail calculation on whether to go for EYW or not will now need to re-calulate and realized, they can only book in Tango (as Flex is now really too experience for MR).. so lost 50% of AQM for those non CDN flights.. that calculation would end up "don't go for EYW".. so another lost revenue to them again...
MR for status... Q4 being the busiest time for MR.. but for those who were still thinking doing MR to get the status might now (finally) decided "forget about it".. so lost revenue again and again
So, my conclusion is only that AC will lost revenue... period... I think if AC mgmt really having someone monitor FlyerTalk should report this to the AC mgmt to fire that maketing lead to choose the timing of releasing the info. They can still go ahead with this move, it is a business afterall, but the timing is still very bad on their end.. and they just let all of those, like myselef, who were undecided to just keep those money in our pocket.
I mean, they did it on the same day where everyone (who care about) is waiting for the info on the EYW info, so many have "hold-off" on booking any flights for the last week or so... i.e. lost revenue to them...
then before they provide the detail badge info on EYW, they annouce this first... which piss a lot of people, as we can see, along with the new rules with special badges on EYW, anyone that have choice and were "thinking" if they should book AC, will most likely book elsewhere... i.e. lost revenue to them again...
and anyone that do all the detail calculation on whether to go for EYW or not will now need to re-calulate and realized, they can only book in Tango (as Flex is now really too experience for MR).. so lost 50% of AQM for those non CDN flights.. that calculation would end up "don't go for EYW".. so another lost revenue to them again...
MR for status... Q4 being the busiest time for MR.. but for those who were still thinking doing MR to get the status might now (finally) decided "forget about it".. so lost revenue again and again
So, my conclusion is only that AC will lost revenue... period... I think if AC mgmt really having someone monitor FlyerTalk should report this to the AC mgmt to fire that maketing lead to choose the timing of releasing the info. They can still go ahead with this move, it is a business afterall, but the timing is still very bad on their end.. and they just let all of those, like myselef, who were undecided to just keep those money in our pocket.
#79
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,519
I think that is what happened when you do not proof read your post, especially you are typing and walking at downtown busy street at the same time.
All I was trying to say is the timing AC releasing their info cost them loosing a lot of potential revenue... they make a lot of people that were either delay in booking (due to EYW promo) or still thinking just not book with AC.
All I was trying to say is the timing AC releasing their info cost them loosing a lot of potential revenue... they make a lot of people that were either delay in booking (due to EYW promo) or still thinking just not book with AC.
#80
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC, YYZ
Programs: AC SE100K, SPG Gold, UA MP
Posts: 1,002
Looks like these new fare changes affect FTers flying from Canada than those who're based elsewhere and have more flight options and still credit to AC/AE.
Agree with others that with FLEX charging a hefty fee to eUp in 2014 maybe better to go for LMU or gun for Z fare if it's not much higher than FLEX. Or a lot of *A to make it to SE avoid the fee.
I'm planning to burn up all my Aeropesos next year then switch to UA after. Hoping to make SE next year to avoid the fees before transitioning to UA
Agree with others that with FLEX charging a hefty fee to eUp in 2014 maybe better to go for LMU or gun for Z fare if it's not much higher than FLEX. Or a lot of *A to make it to SE avoid the fee.
I'm planning to burn up all my Aeropesos next year then switch to UA after. Hoping to make SE next year to avoid the fees before transitioning to UA
#81
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 4,604
I think that is what happened when you do not proof read your post, especially you are typing and walking at downtown busy street at the same time.
All I was trying to say is the timing AC releasing their info cost them loosing a lot of potential revenue... they make a lot of people that were either delay in booking (due to EYW promo) or still thinking just not book with AC.
All I was trying to say is the timing AC releasing their info cost them loosing a lot of potential revenue... they make a lot of people that were either delay in booking (due to EYW promo) or still thinking just not book with AC.
#82
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2009
Location: FRA / YEG
Programs: AC Super Elite, Radisson Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 11,874
I agree with you about the MR folks, but not necessarily about the EYW promo. The T&C are fairly restrictive in that you need to both book and fly within a 2 months period. It is clear that AC is not interested in rewarding those who´d be flying anyway, but instead is trying to generate incremental revenue, convince people to choose AC over another airline and take additional trips they wouldn´t necessarily need to take. They´re actually encouraging people to play the game - they just dot want people to win.
#84
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 4,604
I agree with you about the MR folks, but not necessarily about the EYW promo. The T&C are fairly restrictive in that you need to both book and fly within a 2 months period. It is clear that AC is not interested in rewarding those who´d be flying anyway, but instead is trying to generate incremental revenue, convince people to choose AC over another airline and take additional trips they wouldn´t necessarily need to take. They´re actually encouraging people to play the game - they just dot want people to win.
#86
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
I need to go to VCE end of October returning from Germany in early December:
1. YYZ-VCE (Rogue) Premium Economy now $50 cheaper than Flex - who in their right mind would buy Flex?
2. Germany to Canada Flex is now $450 each way more expensive than Tango. Yesterday it was ~$250. A few months ago it was under $100. They've done to Europe what they did to Asia.
With these moves maybe 20J seats will be too many on the 787's and they'll be able to pull the second J cabin seats out of the 777's and 330's and replace them with PE and Y.
1. YYZ-VCE (Rogue) Premium Economy now $50 cheaper than Flex - who in their right mind would buy Flex?
2. Germany to Canada Flex is now $450 each way more expensive than Tango. Yesterday it was ~$250. A few months ago it was under $100. They've done to Europe what they did to Asia.
With these moves maybe 20J seats will be too many on the 787's and they'll be able to pull the second J cabin seats out of the 777's and 330's and replace them with PE and Y.
#87
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
With this latest enhancement, the International Flex pass to Europe is starting to look relatively more attractive at $699 per segment. Problem is that it books in to V class which is now the lowest category of Flex, so if you don't book well ahead, there is a sustantial chance that V will be zeroed out.
#90
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: Aeroplan Diamond, SPG Plat, Hilton Gold, Marriott
Posts: 1,839
Looks like these new fare changes affect FTers flying from Canada than those who're based elsewhere and have more flight options and still credit to AC/AE.
Agree with others that with FLEX charging a hefty fee to eUp in 2014 maybe better to go for LMU or gun for Z fare if it's not much higher than FLEX. Or a lot of *A to make it to SE avoid the fee.
I'm planning to burn up all my Aeropesos next year then switch to UA after. Hoping to make SE next year to avoid the fees before transitioning to UA
Agree with others that with FLEX charging a hefty fee to eUp in 2014 maybe better to go for LMU or gun for Z fare if it's not much higher than FLEX. Or a lot of *A to make it to SE avoid the fee.
I'm planning to burn up all my Aeropesos next year then switch to UA after. Hoping to make SE next year to avoid the fees before transitioning to UA