Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AC September OTP 69% (80% target)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2012, 10:19 pm
  #16  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
I could however be convinced that the delays were in fact due to employees.

Management employees.
KenHamer is offline  
Old Oct 1, 2012, 10:29 pm
  #17  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
UA's 72% doesn't really inspire either.

I notice that DL, with a load factor just shy of 90%, was maintaining a 92% OTP (in July, I think.) That means that 11 flights out of 12 are departing/arriving on time. And those flights are often full.
KenHamer is offline  
Old Oct 1, 2012, 10:39 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Erstwhile Accidental AC E35K
Posts: 2,916
53% is quite an achievement. It takes a lot of hard work by a lot of people.
Sopwith is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 6:10 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: YYC - not the centre of the universe
Programs: AC*S100K 1MM, LH FTL, Hyatt Globalist, Accor Plat
Posts: 4,768
Not great, not as bad as it has been. Wonder where it'll go - up or down?!
jlisi984 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 6:51 am
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,068
I must be one of the few that has the good fortune of having very few delays.Of the 80+ segments on AC/AC Express to date in 2012,I can count on one hand the delays.
Last week I had a flight push back from the gate 9 minutes early,while I was trying to make a cnx. Missed that one and was delayed for 2+ hours
acysb87 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 7:44 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YEG
Posts: 3,717
Originally Posted by jlisi984
Not great, not as bad as it has been. Wonder where it'll go - up or down?!
with winter around the corner what do you think? :P
hearna is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 11:23 am
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: +61
Programs: SQ*PPS, QF-WP1 & LTG, VA-Gold, Marriott*LTT, Hilton*Gold, Accor*Platinum
Posts: 5,735
The thing I noticed the most between UA and AC flights...

UA flights definitely start boarding 30 minutes in advance.
AC flights continually find creep to their boarding times, often starting 20-25 minutes in advance even if everything looks ready (plane at gate, crew on board, etc).
shuuy is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 12:14 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charlottetown, PE YYG
Programs: AC*SE, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 303
Originally Posted by YYCOllie
The thing I noticed the most between UA and AC flights...

UA flights definitely start boarding 30 minutes in advance.
AC flights continually find creep to their boarding times, often starting 20-25 minutes in advance even if everything looks ready (plane at gate, crew on board, etc).
Totally agree with this... Out of the last 30 segments on AC I can count on one hand the number that actually started boarding at the time given on the BP. Both of my YYZ-YVR/return flights last week were the same as that. Then we get on the plane and the flight crew is rushing everyone to get in seats. Captain comes on BOTH flights and says they are waiting on the pax. Well - let us on the plane with more than 10-15 minutes and we will be ready.
BarrieTravelGuy is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 2:33 pm
  #24  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
Almost exactly a decade ago Air Canada declared that their poor OTP was due to people not being at the boarding gate when boarding began, and therefore they were advancing the boarding time from 30 minutes before departure to 35 minutes before departure.

But in the decade since, it's been exceedingly rare in my experience that boarding even begins at 30 minutes. The only exceptions have been some international long haul flights, and even then boaring seems to delay the flight.

As I noticed in a now ancient thread (Show me the button!):
I also again noticed the new 35 minute advance "boarding time" printed where departure time should be on the boarding pass. Now I've only been on four AC flights since this new policy took effect, but so far not one of them has even started boarding at the 30 minute advance time, nevermind the 35 minutes. So here's a tip for the brain trust at AC -- if you don't start boarding until 15 minutes before the scheduled departure time, it won't matter how early everyone shows up to the boarding area -- you'll still depart late.
KenHamer is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 5:33 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 5,813
Originally Posted by KenHamer
- Or UA allows longer turn around times
- Or UA has longer block times
- Or UA is not trying to rearrange all of their maintenance due to the shutdown of their primary provider
- Or UA is more creative and/or proactive in mitigating delays
- Or UA is more creative and/or proactive dealing with delays when they happen
- Or UA has a much larger fleet and more hubs to cushion the effects of delays, including weather
- Or UA has a much larger workforce so when some employees time out at the end of the month there's a larger pool to cushion the effects
- Or UA isn't suffering a shortage of employees necessitating a hiring binge.
- Or UA isn't waiting on the delayed delivery of aircraft (particularly after merging 2 fleets each larger than AC's)
-By longer do you mean "reasonable". Not sure what that means really? AC sets their turnaround, if they can't meet it more than 60% of the time, change it. Of course, that will depress revenue
-UA and AC each fly early AM YYZSFO w/ A320. Block times are 5 mins apart
- AC's OTP was horrible before Aveos
- Not sure what that means, it's not really subjective. How many flights dock within 15 mins of schedule
- Not sure what that means, it's not really subjective. How many flights dock within 15 mins of schedule
- UA has a bigger fleet ...... And many more scheduled flights (which could also be delayed)
- ....
- ....

Operationally AC has many helping elements to get flights where they're supposed to be (less congested airports, less congested airspace, newer fleet). Hard to imagine how they can lag the competition in this regard.

We can agree to disagree on why they're at the bottom, let's just hope the positive trend continues and AC can crack 70% for xmas

Last edited by CloudsBelow; Oct 2, 2012 at 9:51 pm
CloudsBelow is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.