Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Rovinescu: FIX THIS.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2012, 9:52 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Honors Diamond. Priority Club Platinum. Emerald Club Executive Elite
Posts: 446
Originally Posted by ivanhoe15
The problem is , the New AC rises from the ashes with the same dissaffected employee's doubly pissed off at their new lower pay packages and working conditions and things only get worse for the paying customer.
Maybe Jazz/Chorus will buy a bankrupt Air Canada. Fold it into their own. Fire the entire board and senior management of the current AC. Maybe even start up a true FF plan.

I hear there are a few 757's that may be available to get some routes going during the transition process.
nowinyow is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:01 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by nowinyow
Maybe Jazz/Chorus will buy a bankrupt Air Canada. Fold it into their own. Fire the entire board and senior management of the current AC. Maybe even start up a true FF plan.

I hear there are a few 757's that may be available to get some routes going during the transition process.
Not as far fetched as some may think.

That's pretty much what happened with CrossAir and Swissair
ivanhoe15 is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:09 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CHI
Programs: UA 1K, AZ Exec, MR Titanium, IHG Gold, National Exec
Posts: 3,848
Originally Posted by nowinyow
Maybe Jazz/Chorus will buy a bankrupt Air Canada. Fold it into their own. Fire the entire board and senior management of the current AC. Maybe even start up a true FF plan.
Then AC would finally be run by a management team which knows how to do business and actually work with the unions. We can only hope this happens!
Santander is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:11 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Programs: Altitude 100K Super Elite; AC Million Miles; Emirates Gold; Bonvoy lifetime Platinum Elite;
Posts: 350
We need leadership - not a CEO and a board that seems to be asleep at the proverbial switch. Waiting to pick up the pieces shouldn't be a consideration.
Mustang Sally is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:18 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Honors Diamond. Priority Club Platinum. Emerald Club Executive Elite
Posts: 446
Originally Posted by Mustang Sally
We need leadership - not a CEO and a board that seems to be asleep at the proverbial switch. Waiting to pick up the pieces shouldn't be a consideration.
This mess has been going on for years. It's foolish to even think the current structure can be re-molded. The stink in the AC boardrooms necessitates the need for a complete rebuild. It's akin to removing the smell from years of cigarette smoking from drywall and carpeting. Impossible. Rip it down and start anew.
nowinyow is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:19 am
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,876
Originally Posted by Mustang Sally
We need leadership - not a CEO and a board that seems to be asleep at the proverbial switch. Waiting to pick up the pieces shouldn't be a consideration.

Of course, the possibility that the replacement might be worse is very real. At least the current crowd was aware of the customer satisfaction issue. In that respect they did good work.

Unfortunately, they comfortably installed themselves within the side of the corporate culture that sees labor as the enemy.

I continue believing that the real problem at AC is the hiatus between top and front line. Layers of paper pushers whose main goal is to protect their own existence. Unfortunately, current management did not deal with them early one when they could have. And now they have apparently bought into the BS that these people serve their masters.
Stranger is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:35 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CHI
Programs: UA 1K, AZ Exec, MR Titanium, IHG Gold, National Exec
Posts: 3,848
Originally Posted by Stranger
I continue believing that the real problem at AC is the hiatus between top and front line. Layers of paper pushers whose main goal is to protect their own existence. Unfortunately, current management did not deal with them early one when they could have. And now they have apparently bought into the BS that these people serve their masters.
Well said. ^
Santander is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:41 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Body in Downtown YYZ, heart and mind elsewhere
Programs: UA 50K, refugee from AC E50K, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 5,133
Originally Posted by ridefar
Personally, I think they are done. Bankruptcy is a short way away in my opinion. They are toast.
I agree.

That said, what's the point? Will they resturcture? If so, restructure what? I know many people feel that dumping the pension liability will go a long way to fixing things. Objectively I can see this as the financial impact will be undeniable. But how will "screwing" the employees address "sick-outs" and the other shenanigans we've recently been held hostage to?

At the recent KivaDo in SFO, we had a half-day with Virgin America. It was clear that this airline has an edgy feel to it, much like WS does and that their attitude towards pax is radically different than AC's. The Virgin staff we interacted with repeatedly referred to pax as "our guests" and from the way they said it, they really meant it. It wasn't just some made-up marketing buzz. And at their headquarters you could tell that these folks were there to do serious work but have fun at it too. At the airport, it seemed clear that even the staff at the check-in desks were having their own bits of fun sending people on their way.

All this to say, that IMHO a mere "restructuring" of AC won't be enough to recast the airline into the entity it probably needs to be in the years and decades to come. It would be nice to think that an AC on a strong financial foundation will flourish, but I truly think the issues go much deeper than that.
RCyyz is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:43 am
  #24  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Programs: Altitude 100K Super Elite; AC Million Miles; Emirates Gold; Bonvoy lifetime Platinum Elite;
Posts: 350
Originally Posted by Stranger
At least the current crowd was aware of the customer satisfaction issue.
I'm not clear how much more dissatisfaction I can express at the moment.

If they were vaguely aware of customer satisfaction, I'd have thought they'd have made attempts to resolve this:

I've woken up this morning watching more chaos and more flight cancellations.
I've cancelled my plans this weekend because of this ongoing circus.
I've received no reassurances from Air Canada, despite writing directly to Rovenescu who's office told me they're "working very hard to resolve this..." How they didn't / couldn't say.

Customer satisfaction? In my view it's about on par with Rogers. And that ain't good.
Mustang Sally is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:45 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,711
Originally Posted by RCyyz
All this to say, that IMHO a mere "restructuring" of AC won't be enough to recast the airline into the entity it probably needs to be in the years and decades to come. It would be nice to think that an AC on a strong financial foundation will flourish, but I truly think the issues go much deeper than that.
This.

Changing their attitude / corporate philosophy is easily the most difficult challenge they face.
ffsim is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 10:52 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YYC
Programs: AC 50k 1MM, Marriott LT Titanium Elite
Posts: 3,412
Originally Posted by RCyyz
That said, what's the point? Will they resturcture? If so, restructure what? I know many people feel that dumping the pension liability will go a long way to fixing things. Objectively I can see this as the financial impact will be undeniable. But how will "screwing" the employees address "sick-outs" and the other shenanigans we've recently been held hostage to?
And that sums it up. They are systemically broken. Are the pilots "right" in thinking they deserve a bunch more money? Probably not. Are they right that the management bonuses are an embarrassment? Definitely. But they seem to conflate the two publicly, which means they can't win.

Many front line people (in particular the FAs) are really good these days. Particularly domestically. Even great in many instances. But beyond this there are so many examples of broken systems, relationships, structures, attitudes, etc. that it is really difficult to see how a simple bankruptcy fixes anything.

Your discussion of Virgin makes me think that a purchase by another airline significantly larger than AC is the only real hope of having a good, healthy AC in the long term (larger, because if WS bought them, which culture wins? AC or WS? not hopeful on that score!). Again, way too much cronyism for the government to let Virgin or any other foreign owner buy them--just listening to Calin's speech at the 75th/787 event in YYZ made that clear--but that is what should happen.

And yes, unequivocally, Canada needs more than just folksy ol' WS with no J and limited international connection. It is critical to our economic future. It is too bad AC takes an incredible opportunity and screws it up so catastrophically.
ridefar is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 11:06 am
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,550
Originally Posted by RCyyz
I agree.

At the recent KivaDo in SFO, we had a half-day with Virgin America. It was clear that this airline has an edgy feel to it, much like WS does and that their attitude towards pax is radically different than AC's. The Virgin staff we interacted with repeatedly referred to pax as "our guests" and from the way they said it, they really meant it. It wasn't just some made-up marketing buzz. And at their headquarters you could tell that these folks were there to do serious work but have fun at it too. At the airport, it seemed clear that even the staff at the check-in desks were having their own bits of fun sending people on their way.

All this to say, that IMHO a mere "restructuring" of AC won't be enough to recast the airline into the entity it probably needs to be in the years and decades to come. It would be nice to think that an AC on a strong financial foundation will flourish, but I truly think the issues go much deeper than that.
I was at the same functon with Virgin America.....in fact I asked the question about how much WS influenced their culture. I was told that two of their VPs came from WestJet.

I was very impressed with the airline.
airbus320 is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 11:11 am
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,550
Originally Posted by ridefar
And yes, unequivocally, Canada needs more than just folksy ol' WS with no J and limited international connection.
In the present situation folksy is fine with me....gets me there safely and on time...and without wondering if the airline flies that day....and living in the middle of the country, I don't need J for domestic....as for international connecting either in ORD or MSP opens up the world for me.
airbus320 is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 11:33 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Programs: *G
Posts: 2,304
Originally Posted by Stranger
I continue believing that the real problem at AC is the hiatus between top and front line.
It has long been the situation that AC "management" has no idea what it is really like on the front lines. In fact, their pampered travel means that they don't actually know what it is like to be a real passenger going through the vagaries of pricing, availability, upgrades etc etc.

"Managers" manage people and processes without any understanding of what is actually involved. They are quick to criticize and blame when something goes wrong, and rarely praise when an extra effort is made to try to facilitate solutions when problems occur.

This blame culture includes flight delays - someone is assigned the "blame" when a flight leaves late, so each separate management silo does it's best to shift such blame. The best interests of the passengers do not enter into this equation.

Having said all that, there is obviously also such a "hiatus between top and front line" in the AC unions as well, witness the several rejected tentative settlements.
fin 645 is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2012, 11:37 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 812
Originally Posted by airbus320
.....in fact I asked the question about how much WS influenced their culture. I was told that two of their VPs came from WestJet.
.
Someone is a little mixed up.

The two VP's had a history with Air Canada, Canadian, ZIP and Eastern Provincial.
upgradesecret is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.