Pros & Cons of Switching to UA/CO MP??
#16
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,708
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9780; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.0.448 Mobile Safari/534.8+)
The difference is that UA exists in a market where there is true competition, so they cannot be as capricious as Air Canada is.
The difference is that UA exists in a market where there is true competition, so they cannot be as capricious as Air Canada is.
#18
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON, Canada
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,266
If you're a Gold member or higher and traveling internationally, Star Alliance rules apply. From Canada to the USA counts as "internationally." But if you're like me and fly out of Buffalo a lot, that now becomes a domestic itinerary, and you have to be a member or pay a daily rate.
If you get to SE/1k status with only 20 segments, chances are good most of your flying is International. If you're like me and racking up 60-80 segments up and down the Atlantic coast, then the $350 a year is worth every penny just to have free coffee and a quiet place to work (much less free booze.) The lounges are NOT as nice as a MLL. Suck it up. The corporate staff don't treat their elites with contempt, either. *cough AC*
I also like to point out that EVERY fare (except reward travel) counts for mileage accumulation on UA. None of this Tango/Tango+ crap where you shell out an extra $70/segment just to get miles. UA also credits to a much broader range of partner airline fare classes. So when I see people claim "35k on AC is easier than 50k on UA," I actually beg to differ.
#19
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
$399/year, but as well as the lounges, includes things like out of country medical insurance, deductible free car rental coverage, etc. Also has a number of travel benefits such as two for one ticketing, upgrades, and discounted fares, albeit most are from J and F.
1¼ points/$ which can be transferred into a number of programs, including CX, AC, DL, BA, and a few others, as well as into a number of hotel programs.
#20
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
I also like to point out that EVERY fare (except reward travel) counts for mileage accumulation on UA. None of this Tango/Tango+ crap where you shell out an extra $70/segment just to get miles. UA also credits to a much broader range of partner airline fare classes. So when I see people claim "35k on AC is easier than 50k on UA," I actually beg to differ.
#21
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a hotel somewhere trying to repack everything I brought (and bought) in to a carry-on smaller than my last one.
Programs: UA, Asia Miles, Southwest, IHG
Posts: 1,101
I had always been with UA as they had more award ticket availability, and there was no penalty (points or $) for last minute booking. However, I noticed that with the recent merger, certain routes have been cancelled. For example, UA's JFK - HKG no longer exists. For something to NYC you now have to fly in and out of Newark (NJ). So if total # flights have decreased, I'd assume the total # of seats (and therefore award seats) would also decrease.
My main issue with AC over the years is that they have some sort of East coast vs West coast rivalry within the company. For example, when I check-in YYZ and have my upgrades confirmed, I get bumped when I reach YVR bc their logic is that I didn't get there in time (...?!) I had already checked-thru to HKG 8-hours prior in YYZ! My flight didn't arrive late or anything. So my choice was either to go in Y or to overnight in YVR
Another issue with non-AC *Alliance is that you get a lot of MLL attitude. In the past as *G I've been refused entry into several MLL even when flying AC metal. Had to get the UA supervisor to sort it out more than a few times and it was explained to me as politics or just "attitude". The point is, why are we being treated like panhandlers when trying to enter MLL?
However, if you are mainly based in Canada, and your bills are paid there, the credit card offers are good for accruing AP points so it would be better to stay with AP. You can always transfer your AP points to UA/CO "shell" account for redemption purposes.
My main issue with AC over the years is that they have some sort of East coast vs West coast rivalry within the company. For example, when I check-in YYZ and have my upgrades confirmed, I get bumped when I reach YVR bc their logic is that I didn't get there in time (...?!) I had already checked-thru to HKG 8-hours prior in YYZ! My flight didn't arrive late or anything. So my choice was either to go in Y or to overnight in YVR
Another issue with non-AC *Alliance is that you get a lot of MLL attitude. In the past as *G I've been refused entry into several MLL even when flying AC metal. Had to get the UA supervisor to sort it out more than a few times and it was explained to me as politics or just "attitude". The point is, why are we being treated like panhandlers when trying to enter MLL?
However, if you are mainly based in Canada, and your bills are paid there, the credit card offers are good for accruing AP points so it would be better to stay with AP. You can always transfer your AP points to UA/CO "shell" account for redemption purposes.
#22
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,708
#23
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC*SEMM
Posts: 602
This is true. However the T+ fare of the ex-USA are similar to AC's fare during same time period last year (SEA-PVG for example, which I fly about 4 times a year), while the Tango fare is about $200 less than T+. Last year all they had was T+.
As long as the above remains true, the introduction of Tango fare simply gives you an option of spending less (and get fewer status miles - and no upgrades).
As long as the above remains true, the introduction of Tango fare simply gives you an option of spending less (and get fewer status miles - and no upgrades).
#24
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,763
If you want to switch to an american program, I'd suggest US before UACO. No YQ, an actual shot at getting an upgrade without 1K status, etc. is all really nice...
That said, not sure if US has full mileage accrual for AC Tango fares.
That said, not sure if US has full mileage accrual for AC Tango fares.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
All of the US programs (not just *A, but Delta, AA... all unless someone can correct me) charge for lounge access on domestic itineraries. An annual membership costs between $300-$500. It has nothing to do with status, although the membership is cheaper the higher up the status ladder you are.
- Diamond elites (125K) get full Sky Club membership and the partner lounge reciprocity and most generous guest rules that go with it
- First, Business Elite and full Y-fare passengers get Club access on select transcons have access: between JFK and Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Portland, Phoenix, San Diego, Seattle, and San Francisco
- Business class passengers on flights from Mexico get access
- Gold elites (50K) and higher get club access on international travel regardless of the ticketed class of service, and for club access purposes Canada is considered international (for many other purposes with the airline, it's not)
- Delta Reserve (Amex, $450 annual fee) cardholders get access when flying a Delta-operated segment
#26
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CHI
Programs: UA 1K, MR Titanium, IHG Gold, National Exec
Posts: 3,841
Personally I don't mind the reduced earning for discount Y for domestic travel, that's pretty much the global norm (there is a world outside the US). The problem I think is that they're applying this to international routes where they have to compete with "real" airlines while offering either an inferior product (e.g. compared to CX) or uncompetitive price (e.g. compared to CA). If I'm only going to earn 50% miles, I might as well just fly CA for $700 r/t PEK-YVR instead of forking over more money for a non-upgradeable AC flight with less legroom and inferior service. International Tango fares is almost a good thing for me, I no longer feel "tied down" to AC and am free to fly better airlines.
#27
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: YWG
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 1,478
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
The US market is over 10x the size of the Canadian market. There are now just five major and three minor players. By dividing by a factor of ten, there should not be any airlines operating in Canada, let alone two competing carriers.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
Another issue with non-AC *Alliance is that you get a lot of MLL attitude. In the past as *G I've been refused entry into several MLL even when flying AC metal. Had to get the UA supervisor to sort it out more than a few times and it was explained to me as politics or just "attitude". The point is, why are we being treated like panhandlers when trying to enter MLL?
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,305
Another issue with non-AC *Alliance is that you get a lot of MLL attitude. In the past as *G I've been refused entry into several MLL even when flying AC metal. Had to get the UA supervisor to sort it out more than a few times and it was explained to me as politics or just "attitude". The point is, why are we being treated like panhandlers when trying to enter MLL?