Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Suggestions for Air Canada

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2011, 7:31 am
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Aeroplan *E, Marriott Elite Silver
Posts: 146
Suggestions for Air Canada

Here are two tips that may reduce some anger towards AE / AC :-

- People who are very close to achieving status in December (say within 5%), let them pay a fee to get to the status instead of making them do an MR. This way AC gets the money without having to fill up a seat for the passenger. They get to sell that seat again. I understand why they can't let people purchase status, but if you're within 1000 points of Elite then why not charge you $150 to give you status?

OR (AND?)

- Like Marriott Rewards, allow people to carry points over that are above the status level. I am Marriot Elite Silver and since I knew I wouldn't have qualified for Gold, I started shopping for other programs. Then Marriott announced they'd let me carry unused points over so boom, I am back to Marriott. So lets say you accumulated 45,000 points this year. 35k go to make you Elite, and 10k carry over. They can also reduce carryovers (say let you carry over only 25%). They can make carryover points expire in one year so you dont always carry them over, but this would go a long way to encourage people to stay loyal OR to not penalize people who usually travel a lot but had one down year.

Come one AC/AE, throw us a bone from time to time please
uwbrother is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 7:45 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 379
Originally Posted by uwbrother
Here are two tips that may reduce some anger towards AE / AC :-

- People who are very close to achieving status in December (say within 5%), let them pay a fee to get to the status instead of making them do an MR. This way AC gets the money without having to fill up a seat for the passenger. They get to sell that seat again. I understand why they can't let people purchase status, but if you're within 1000 points of Elite then why not charge you $150 to give you status?

OR (AND?)

- Like Marriott Rewards, allow people to carry points over that are above the status level. I am Marriot Elite Silver and since I knew I wouldn't have qualified for Gold, I started shopping for other programs. Then Marriott announced they'd let me carry unused points over so boom, I am back to Marriott. So lets say you accumulated 45,000 points this year. 35k go to make you Elite, and 10k carry over. They can also reduce carryovers (say let you carry over only 25%). They can make carryover points expire in one year so you dont always carry them over, but this would go a long way to encourage people to stay loyal OR to not penalize people who usually travel a lot but had one down year.

Come one AC/AE, throw us a bone from time to time please
Great idea but I wouldn't chance it. I have well over the AE mileage but the new 10,000 AC BS -- 600 miles short so have to do a MR.
I don't trust AC/AP to be kind enough to grant me E status for 2012 even after being an E for over 10 years. Nothing but bad news from AC/AP so I would do a MR to be safe.
travelblond is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 7:46 am
  #3  
alc
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,519
Originally Posted by uwbrother
OR (AND?)

- Like Marriott Rewards, allow people to carry points over that are above the status level....
I wonder if AC introduce this idea, and I am sitting at 70K with no plan to MR to get to SE, will I get E for 2 years?
alc is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 8:16 am
  #4  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Aeroplan *E, Marriott Elite Silver
Posts: 146
Originally Posted by alc
I wonder if AC introduce this idea, and I am sitting at 70K with no plan to MR to get to SE, will I get E for 2 years?
So you used 35K for Elite and have 35K extra. If AC lets you carry over 50% of these points then you get to carry over 17K-18K, instead of starting from scratch.
uwbrother is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 8:48 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYZ
Programs: A3*G AC*nobody TK*nobody
Posts: 1,967
OP, Idea # 1 is a good one.

However Idea # 2 will need to tweak. As someone mentioned, if I have earn 70+k, is that mean I can be E for 2 years? Which I don't think AP will buy that idea....

BTW, http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...stion-box.html
Away from YYZ is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 9:17 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,187
Was there not a similar thread a couple of weeks ago? I'd nix the first idea as being grossly unfair to those who actually fly to make status. And I have doubts about the second unless it was capped (maybe at 17.5K rollover max...i.e. half of Elite) since there are many who can rack up 200K+ in SMs so prequalify for SE the next year already...ad infinitum, or let them go over and spend the year with ONEWORLD or SKYTEAM. Also, given the spread between E and SE, there are thousands who'd have a handsome number of SMs over 35K but short of 100K.
Shareholder is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 10:44 am
  #7  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Aeroplan *E, Marriott Elite Silver
Posts: 146
Like everything else AC is doing isn't unfair to flyers .

The point is that those within 5% of threshold will do an MR anyway (if they care). For those, AC can charge them the cost of MR without them actually flying. AC wins, they win. You dont actually lose anything. I can see issues if everyone could do it. But 5% threshold limits it to real flyers only.

About the second, there are many ways around it. Many reward programs do this already. It's not a new suggestion.

Originally Posted by Shareholder
Was there not a similar thread a couple of weeks ago? I'd nix the first idea as being grossly unfair to those who actually fly to make status. And I have doubts about the second unless it was capped (maybe at 17.5K rollover max...i.e. half of Elite) since there are many who can rack up 200K+ in SMs so prequalify for SE the next year already...ad infinitum, or let them go over and spend the year with ONEWORLD or SKYTEAM. Also, given the spread between E and SE, there are thousands who'd have a handsome number of SMs over 35K but short of 100K.
uwbrother is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 11:14 am
  #8  
cur
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: fwp blood diamond, dykwia uranium
Posts: 7,252
Originally Posted by uwbrother
Here are two tips that may reduce some anger towards AE / AC :-

- People who are very close to achieving status in December (say within 5%), let them pay a fee to get to the status instead of making them do an MR. This way AC gets the money without having to fill up a seat for the passenger. They get to sell that seat again. I understand why they can't let people purchase status, but if you're within 1000 points of Elite then why not charge you $150 to give you status?

OR (AND?)

- Like Marriott Rewards, allow people to carry points over that are above the status level. I am Marriot Elite Silver and since I knew I wouldn't have qualified for Gold, I started shopping for other programs. Then Marriott announced they'd let me carry unused points over so boom, I am back to Marriott. So lets say you accumulated 45,000 points this year. 35k go to make you Elite, and 10k carry over. They can also reduce carryovers (say let you carry over only 25%). They can make carryover points expire in one year so you dont always carry them over, but this would go a long way to encourage people to stay loyal OR to not penalize people who usually travel a lot but had one down year.

Come one AC/AE, throw us a bone from time to time please
I disagree. MR. Either you earn status, or you don't. E isn't hard to earn. SE is, but what's the point of having SE if you don't fly the 100k? Makes it less prestigious. And then we will have even more Es and SEs, making it harder for those that actually fly a lot.

Plus there is probably more money to be earned selling the seat to a MR than your fairy tale "leave it to be sold to someone else" theory...what if it goes empty? Then there's little gain.
cur is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 11:32 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: YWG
Programs: SEMM,SPG Plat
Posts: 306
Originally Posted by travelblond
Great idea but I wouldn't chance it. I have well over the AE mileage but the new 10,000 AC BS -- 600 miles short so have to do a MR.
I don't trust AC/AP to be kind enough to grant me E status for 2012 even after being an E for over 10 years. Nothing but bad news from AC/AP so I would do a MR to be safe.
Did you know that you have to do either 10,000 miles OR 5 segments with Air Canada.

If you can't do either, I am sure that Air Canada does not see you as a valuable customer, and the rest of your comments are then meaningless.

I suspect a number of people think they have to do both.
Ziptie is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 1:24 pm
  #10  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
See Status by Hitchcock for a much more detailed proposal from a few years ago.
KenHamer is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 1:29 pm
  #11  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Aeroplan *E, Marriott Elite Silver
Posts: 146
Originally Posted by cur
I disagree. MR. Either you earn status, or you don't. E isn't hard to earn. SE is, but what's the point of having SE if you don't fly the 100k? Makes it less prestigious. And then we will have even more Es and SEs, making it harder for those that actually fly a lot.

Plus there is probably more money to be earned selling the seat to a MR than your fairy tale "leave it to be sold to someone else" theory...what if it goes empty? Then there's little gain.
You missed the "if they're within 5% of the status". So if a potential SE has more than 95000 status miles, then how does allowing them to cover the gap by paying a fee makes it "less pristegious"? Those willing to pay do an MR these days. How does a useless "I go there and turn right back" trip makes it any more prestigious?

I am not suggesting letting everyone buy the next status. Saying only people who're within 5% of the threshold.
uwbrother is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 1:32 pm
  #12  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Aeroplan *E, Marriott Elite Silver
Posts: 146
Originally Posted by KenHamer
See Status by Hitchcock for a much more detailed proposal from a few years ago.
That guy is a genius! That's generally what I am saying. Within reason and with limits, let people who "almost made it" get there without doing silly stuff. I write this as I embark on my MR myself : )
uwbrother is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 3:35 pm
  #13  
cur
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: fwp blood diamond, dykwia uranium
Posts: 7,252
Originally Posted by uwbrother
You missed the "if they're within 5% of the status". So if a potential SE has more than 95000 status miles, then how does allowing them to cover the gap by paying a fee makes it "less pristegious"? Those willing to pay do an MR these days. How does a useless "I go there and turn right back" trip makes it any more prestigious?

I am not suggesting letting everyone buy the next status. Saying only people who're within 5% of the threshold.
No, I didn't miss the 5%. If you're short, just fly the additional 5 000. If it matters that much, wouldn't you fly the 5k? Offering the 5% deal would look rude and penny pinching as well: why shouldn't they just give the status? Why not just lower the threshold to 95k?

And I think there are a lot of people that are elite that just don't care. I think FT represents a minority of flyers that have status. I have talked to tons of other Es and SEs that have never heard of FlyerTalk, let alone care about how they can use their ecredits.
cur is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2011, 5:12 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Programs: AC*SE
Posts: 1,954
Originally Posted by uwbrother
That guy is a genius! That's generally what I am saying. Within reason and with limits, let people who "almost made it" get there without doing silly stuff. I write this as I embark on my MR myself : )
"That guy" (Ken hAAmer) is KenHamer's alter ego (well previous handle)...
CdnFlier is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2011, 2:01 pm
  #15  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9780; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.0.448 Mobile Safari/534.8+)

I prefer to think of it as an MPD.
KenHamer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.