Originally Posted by
justhere
"How to tell when someone has nothing left to defend their point" by Proudelitist. Soon to be a best seller.
This has already been brought up in this thread. You can't compare murder to seat saving and it most certainly doesn't follow my logic. In logic terms you've used a false comparison.
Murder is not the issue. The issue is that even fractional issues matter. If they didn't, why seek a cure for cancer? Why bother preventing head on collisions? The logic I disagree with is that seat saving is insignificant given the number of flights and pax each day, simply because it is a small fraction.