Originally Posted by
EWR764
The loss of the lav and significant cut to E+ makes this the worst configuration in the fleet, IMO.
Let's see here. It retains easily the best recliner F cabin in the fleet. And there's no measure that says the 738 will be better in Y. The 753 Y cabin will be be a mixed bag like it's always been. There's areas where it's the best in the narrowbody fleet, like with all the exit rows, and there's areas where it's the worst (like being in the back with a tight connection). The overall result is that it will still be arguably the best narrowbody in the fleet due to the superior F cabin. There's no objective way to say it's the overall worst.
Originally Posted by
spin88
Delta's version has 210 Y, with 5 1/2 rows of C+ (with 34" pitch) and 4 lavs for Y. UA currently has 189 Y, with 61/2 rows of 35" E+, and 4 lavs for Y. I guess UA has a choice here, do they go with 3 lavs and keep more E+ seats, or do they go with a very similar configuration to DL, cutting out one row of E+?
If the end configuration remains the same as the schematic, UA decided to retain a partial galley at door 2R instead of removing it for a lavatory. And up front, there's galley space both ahead and behind door 1R. DL eliminated that aft galley space. Flight attendants will certainly appreciate it, and it will make inflight service easier.
Originally Posted by
DCA writer
The 738 will still have a worse passenger:lav ratio: Two for 150 people in the back.
And maybe more importantly, the lavs aren't all in the back, like the Big 3's 738s or DL's 739s.