Originally Posted by
carlosdca
Rumors? or FTers rationalized wishes?
Wouldn't an existing profitable route make more sense? (MIA-GIG?)
If the route is existing and profitable why would they retire the perfectly fine equipment and incur a huge new capital cost just to eke out a slightly larger profit?
I would think more likely the use of the 787 would be in expansion, adding more long and thin routes like those named (as was part of the design intent of the 787).