FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - ARCHIVE: AA 787 Orders / Delays / Changes / Delivery Dates, 2012 and later (consolida
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 12:40 pm
  #165  
arlflyer
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DCA
Posts: 7,777
Originally Posted by carlosdca
Rumors? or FTers rationalized wishes?

Wouldn't an existing profitable route make more sense? (MIA-GIG?)
If the route is existing and profitable why would they retire the perfectly fine equipment and incur a huge new capital cost just to eke out a slightly larger profit?

I would think more likely the use of the 787 would be in expansion, adding more long and thin routes like those named (as was part of the design intent of the 787).
arlflyer is offline