That is interesting, as the price apparently refers to a 12.5 in Y one direction, 25 in F the other and a stopover at 10k. What makes YYZ the destination and not a stopover with MCO as destination in this situation? If YYZ was the stopover and not destination, then it would be 60k total for that itin. I can see an argument for either, but am just curious on how that gets declared.

Then again I never got the trick of using Fiji (NAN) as destination and NZ/OZ as a stopover, but pricing as an award to NAN and not NZ/OZ. Not relevant to the NA award above or anything I typically book but shouldn't the award price as the highest possible region as the destination and the stopover is in the less expensive of the regions?