Originally Posted by magiciansampras

Empirically we know that both types of people exist. What fascinates me is that kage hasn't acknowledged that some might actually prefer a home.

Originally Posted by magiciansampras

I don't understand what we're arguing about anymore. I wouldn't want to live the lifestyle of the person in the quoted text, which was the question. You keep trying to change the goalposts and suggest that living in a hotel-apartment counts as a hotel. The whole point of the article is that this man doesn't stay in one place for long, indeed he is only in one place for a "short period of time." Would I enjoy that life? Not at all.

Originally Posted by magiciansampras

I ask again, do you honestly find it surprising that someone would not want to live in a hotel, even at the height of luxury, every day of their life?

Originally Posted by magiciansampras

When you start talking about hotel condo residences that are shells you start getting into apartment territory as far as I am concerned.

Originally Posted by nba1017

A family member of mine actually lived at a high-end New York hotel (would prefer not to mention which one) for about five years. He had a two-bedroom corner suite--pretty-well outfitted kitchen, second bedroom converted into an office, full bar set up, and so on. It was basically just a very nice NYC apartment with room service and housekeeping. I don't think the rent was appreciably more than what such a place would cost in a non-hotel property.