Originally Posted by
ikonos
Shouldn't the two itinerary's be separate from one another? I think they are sold as two separate tickets and each ticket should be viewed in its isolation.
That's not the way it works, unfortunately.
Originally Posted by
mnredfox
This is actually end-on-end ticketing and legal, as 2nd itin is completely nested within the first. Not against fare rules.
How so? It's not end-on-end; it's back-to-back and
potentially illegal. In the (highly unlikely) scenario that the OP's first ticket required a 2-week minimum stay, the second ticket would illegally circumvent that requirement.