Uncooperative Pax meets a Billy Stick
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Uncooperative Pax meets a Billy Stick
On tonight's UAX 6468 DEN-CPR flight a passenger was repeatedly asked by the FA prior to push-back to turn off his cell phone. The passenger loading bridge had already been pulled back with only the airstairs in use. After being told numerous times by the FA she advised him that he would not be flying with them tonight and needed to deboard the plane. Pax refuses and tells her he's not getting off.
Denver P.D. were called to assist and two uniformed officers arrived to escort the pax off the plane. 30 seconds after boarding the plane, one of the officers was ejected down the stairs by the pax and out come the billy clubs. Pax and the two officers continued to fight in the galley with many swings of the stick in use for a full 20 minutes until 3 more officers arrived and were finally able to cuff him and get him off the plane.
Pax was eventually restrained in a gurney and transported to a local hospital due to his head being split open in a couple of places. FA was too upset to continue and a replacement was brought in.
Flight left late after the cleanup from the blood splatter.
Denver P.D. were called to assist and two uniformed officers arrived to escort the pax off the plane. 30 seconds after boarding the plane, one of the officers was ejected down the stairs by the pax and out come the billy clubs. Pax and the two officers continued to fight in the galley with many swings of the stick in use for a full 20 minutes until 3 more officers arrived and were finally able to cuff him and get him off the plane.
Pax was eventually restrained in a gurney and transported to a local hospital due to his head being split open in a couple of places. FA was too upset to continue and a replacement was brought in.
Flight left late after the cleanup from the blood splatter.
#2
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,857
wow -- I am glad to say in my 800+ flights, 1.5M miles, nearly 50 years of flying I have never seen an event even close to this.
Suspect this guy is going to spend some serious time in jail.
Suspect this guy is going to spend some serious time in jail.
#3
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central California
Programs: Former UA Premex, now dirt
Posts: 6,531
In over 30 years of law enforcement, I only experienced something like that a couple of times and never on a plane/train/bus. Cramped quarters like those in the galley would make it "interesting." All those sharp corners and hard surfaces.
#4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Raleigh
Programs: United GS 2MM,, Marriott/Starwood Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 754
Over consumption of alcohol often seems to get people into these belligerent moods, though the length of the incident you are describing sounds seriously bonkers.
Technically, in my experience, it is the closing of the door (not pulling of the jetbridge) that is the deadline for cell phone use. That said, compliance with the FA after numerous requests would seem appropriate.
I presume the passengers were fairly shaken up by witnessing this? Did any passengers opt to deplane prior to departure?
Technically, in my experience, it is the closing of the door (not pulling of the jetbridge) that is the deadline for cell phone use. That said, compliance with the FA after numerous requests would seem appropriate.
I presume the passengers were fairly shaken up by witnessing this? Did any passengers opt to deplane prior to departure?
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
Just a question though. If the air stairs were in use, that means the door was open. Isn't the reg about turning off electronics when the door closes? I know, the whole "obey flight crew" stuff. But rules have to be enforced uniformly, FAs cannot make their own, and the door being open may in fact provide a legal argument. I'm thinking a good lawyer (which he will obviously need) will bring the case back to the FA as abusive first.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
#6
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: On the road in North America....
Programs: UA 1MM, *G, Global Entry
Posts: 579
Just a question though. If the air stairs were in use, that means the door was open. Isn't the reg about turning off electronics when the door closes? I know, the whole "obey flight crew" stuff. But rules have to be enforced uniformly, FAs cannot make their own, and the door being open may in fact provide a legal argument. I'm thinking a good lawyer (which he will obviously need) will bring the case back to the FA as abusive first.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
joe
#7
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHL & (gasp) AVP (NEPA)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 787
Just a question though. If the air stairs were in use, that means the door was open. Isn't the reg about turning off electronics when the door closes? I know, the whole "obey flight crew" stuff. But rules have to be enforced uniformly, FAs cannot make their own, and the door being open may in fact provide a legal argument. I'm thinking a good lawyer (which he will obviously need) will bring the case back to the FA as abusive first.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
"The FA was wrong so you can't fault me for attacking the LEO"
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,227
- I know, the whole "obey flight crew" stuff. But rules have to be enforced uniformly, FAs cannot make their own, and the door being open may in fact provide a legal argument. I'm thinking a good lawyer (which he will obviously need) will bring the case back to the FA as abusive first.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
Thanks for a concise recap of a somewhat "interesting" fight and flight ... This may be the first time I've seen an appropriate use of the airport police and the "obey your FA" rules, although with any call today, there is a bit of "yelling wolf" involved due to other FAs overreacting at the most minor event until it is proven (as in this case) that a real issue exists. Don't think the airport police don't realize they are often used as puppets (by FAs, other airport personnel and of course and mostly by TSA)
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Yeah, I think the whole trial is going to center on whether the flight attendant was in a good mood or not. If she was grouchy, then yeah, I think an all-out brawl with the cops is an excellent idea.
#11
Join Date: Feb 2005
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium (former PP), Hilton Silver, UA Silver, AS Member, Hertz 5*
Posts: 3,906
Just a question though. If the air stairs were in use, that means the door was open. Isn't the reg about turning off electronics when the door closes? I know, the whole "obey flight crew" stuff. But rules have to be enforced uniformly, FAs cannot make their own, and the door being open may in fact provide a legal argument. I'm thinking a good lawyer (which he will obviously need) will bring the case back to the FA as abusive first.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
So was the door open? Were there other passengers still using cell phones and this one picked on? Was the FA rude or obnoxious? Just a few questions that will come up.
#12
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 4,510
A full color re-play of this event should be part of all pre-flight videos.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
I'll be clobbered for this, but while the pax was apparently a jerk (I'm leaving open the possibility that what OP and the FA observed as a cell phone was in fact a cell phone and not some other device like a medical halter monitor), hopefully she's learned a lesson: don't enforce inane and useless rules. It isn't good for her emotional health.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
I'll be clobbered for this, but while the pax was apparently a jerk (I'm leaving open the possibility that what OP and the FA observed as a cell phone was in fact a cell phone and not some other device like a medical halter monitor), hopefully she's learned a lesson: don't enforce inane and useless rules. It isn't good for her emotional health.
#15
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: On the road in North America....
Programs: UA 1MM, *G, Global Entry
Posts: 579
I'll be clobbered for this, but while the pax was apparently a jerk (I'm leaving open the possibility that what OP and the FA observed as a cell phone was in fact a cell phone and not some other device like a medical halter monitor), hopefully she's learned a lesson: don't enforce inane and useless rules. It isn't good for her emotional health.
joe