Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United Flight Attendant Q&A Thread [2013 and Onward]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

United Flight Attendant Q&A Thread [2013 and Onward]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2014, 9:23 pm
  #76  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by TomMM
If a flight crew has a multi-day layover do they get paid for the days between flights? Back in March I was on a EWR-LIS flight and while waiting for the door to open I struck up a conversation with a FA who said they 3 day layover before returning. Ever since I've been wondering, among other things, if those 3 days were unpaid.
I'm not sure about the sCO contract. I believe they only get paid with actual flight time (?). On the sUA FA contract, we are paid a minimum of 5 hrs per day regardless of actual short flight times. With a muti- day trip, just multiply each day by 5 and compare with the actual flight time, whatever the greater is what we are paid.
jetaway96 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 9:26 pm
  #77  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by TomMM
If a flight crew has a multi-day layover do they get paid for the days between flights? Back in March I was on a EWR-LIS flight and while waiting for the door to open I struck up a conversation with a FA who said they 3 day layover before returning. Ever since I've been wondering, among other things, if those 3 days were unpaid.

O.
Trip Rig
Prior to pairing origination, each trip pairing that contains
a scheduled rest period of over twenty nine hours (29:00)
shall have the following minimum pay value added to
line value, or the flight time, whichever is greater:
1.
A flight attendant who departs her/his base on a trip
pairing shall receive a minimum of one hour (1:00)
of pay for each four hours (4:00) elapsed period,
prorated until s/he returns to her/his base.
2.
Such trip rig pay shall be computed so as to include
the time required to report for duty prior to flight, but
not less than one hour (1:00), and the time
subsequent to her/his return including the fifteen
minutes (:15) continuation of duty time after a trip
arrives at the block (thirty minutes (:30) for trips
when Customs clearance is required).
3.
A flight attendant’s trip rig pay will be based on
scheduled or actual duty time, whichever is greater.
4.
The difference between the flying pay earned during
such period and the minimum pay provided in this
paragraph shall be computed as an extension of
the final portion of the return trip to such flight attendant's base.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 9:37 pm
  #78  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,429
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
O.
Trip Rig
Prior to pairing origination, each trip pairing that contains
a scheduled rest period of over twenty nine hours (29:00)
shall have the following minimum pay value added to
line value, or the flight time, whichever is greater:
1.
A flight attendant who departs her/his base on a trip
pairing shall receive a minimum of one hour (1:00)
of pay for each four hours (4:00) elapsed period,
prorated until s/he returns to her/his base.
2.
Such trip rig pay shall be computed so as to include
the time required to report for duty prior to flight, but
not less than one hour (1:00), and the time
subsequent to her/his return including the fifteen
minutes (:15) continuation of duty time after a trip
arrives at the block (thirty minutes (:30) for trips
when Customs clearance is required).
3.
A flight attendant’s trip rig pay will be based on
scheduled or actual duty time, whichever is greater.
4.
The difference between the flying pay earned during
such period and the minimum pay provided in this
paragraph shall be computed as an extension of
the final portion of the return trip to such flight attendant's base.
en anglais s'il vous plaît

en Inglés por favor

anglicky, prosím (that would be in my native tongue).
EmailKid is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 10:02 pm
  #79  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by EmailKid
en anglais s'il vous plaît

en Inglés por favor

anglicky, prosím (that would be in my native tongue).
Basically any pairing that has scheduled layover of 29:00 (29 hours) or longer will have a minimum of 1:00 (1 hour) of pay for every 4:00 (4 hours) elapsed. This will be happening a lot during the winter months when a few of the European trips are not daily and crews have 2, 3 & 4 day layovers.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 10:09 pm
  #80  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,429
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
Basically any pairing that has scheduled layover of 29:00 (29 hours) or longer will have a minimum of 1:00 (1 hour) of pay for every 4:00 (4 hours) elapsed. This will be happening a lot during the winter months when a few of the European trips are not daily and crews have 2, 3 & 4 day layovers.
Děkuji

Merci (do remember a little of my high school French)

Thanks
EmailKid is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 10:24 pm
  #81  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: DEN
Programs: Delta Silver. Former AA gold. UA MP and DL Plat AMEX cardholder
Posts: 1,254
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
The upside is on the sCO side we now have many more base options...the downside not enough FAs transferred to them to support the flying. The sCO bases in EWR, LAX, SFO, DEN & ORD are below targeted staffing levels, but have surpluses in IAH & CLE. Meanwhile over on the sUA side they are short in IAH, SFO & JFK, but have surpluses in LAX, DEN & ORD. The base imbalances are affecting flight attendant scheduling efficiency, the quality of pairings, ability to trip trade, line averages and overall quality of life.

Also a combined total of 900 FAs (300 from sCO, 600 from sUA) I wrote earlier it was 600 (300 from each side) will be relocated.

sCO:
250 moves out of IAH
50 moves out of CLE
25 moves into EWR
75 moves into LAX
125 moves into SFO
25 moves into DEN
50 moves into ORD

sUA:
200 moves out of LAX
200 moves out of DEN
200 moves out of ORD
100 moves into IAH
350 moves into JFK
150 moves into SFO

Of course these numbers are always subject to change between now and October.
{unneeded} Management should merge the two damn sides of this airline and there wouldn't be a need for any of this.

Work hard, fly stupid is more like it.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Oct 22, 2014 at 11:12 pm Reason: language
REPUBLIC757 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 10:49 am
  #82  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Hiring FAs.

Looks like were hiring FAs again. Positions include regular FAs (non-speaker) and various foreign language speaker FAs:
Portuguese, German, Italian, French, Japanese & Mandarian & Hebrew.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 12:35 pm
  #83  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,856
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
Looks like were hiring FAs again. ....
Hmmm, doing buyouts and hiring at the same time ....connecting the dots....
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 1:18 pm
  #84  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 498
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
Looks like were hiring FAs again. Positions include regular FAs (non-speaker) and various foreign language speaker FAs:
Portuguese, German, Italian, French, Japanese & Mandarian & Hebrew.
Which subsidiary (or both)?

On a related note, have any numbers been rumored on the buyouts? If I recall it's still early in the timeline for them to be processed.

I think it's nice to hear the workforce is growing. Buyouts aren't awesome, but if Chicago can justify the one-time expense in order to build the workforce they need in the future then more power to them.
wto605 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 3:24 pm
  #85  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 6,020
Looks like sCO based on the bases. Also, no commuters, and they don't pay for relocation costs.
PTahCha is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 3:42 pm
  #86  
Liz
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Not at home
Programs: MP
Posts: 2,312
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
Hmmm, doing buyouts and hiring at the same time ....connecting the dots....
We are doing the same. Just like with SEA closing.

Originally Posted by PTahCha
Looks like sCO based on the bases. Also, no commuters, and they don't pay for relocation costs.
sCO has a HUGE commuter population. I seriously doubt the "no commuter" rule.
Liz is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 6:27 pm
  #87  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Originally Posted by PTahCha
Looks like sCO based on the bases. Also, no commuters, and they don't pay for relocation costs.
Yes sCO bases (although LAX, SFO, IAD, DEN & ORD are sUA bases as well). Reserves can commute they just have to be near their base airport on their reserve days.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2014, 11:25 pm
  #88  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 261
Originally Posted by wto605
On a related note, have any numbers been rumored on the buyouts?
Over 1300 was announced. The response was said to be overwhelming.
BB2220 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2014, 4:57 am
  #89  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,690
Originally Posted by gdavis
Do the flight attendants know if you paid for your first class ticket, or if you got it on upgrades or miles?
Just like pax, they can tell by just looking......

Thanks to all the FAs out there who shuffled me around all year in comfort and safety ....
LaserSailor is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2014, 7:38 pm
  #90  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,043
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
I'll give my perspective from the CO side of the operation.
From a pax perspective, whats the likelihood that I would encounter the same FA on an INTL flight from EWR?

Last edited by TomMM; Oct 29, 2014 at 7:47 pm
TomMM is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.